Combining time-variable controlled release urea formulations to improve spring maize yield and reduce nitrogen losses in northeastern China

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY European Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2024-07-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127268
Yunpeng Hou , Xinpeng Xu , Lili Kong , Yitao Zhang , Lei Zhang , Lichun Wang
{"title":"Combining time-variable controlled release urea formulations to improve spring maize yield and reduce nitrogen losses in northeastern China","authors":"Yunpeng Hou ,&nbsp;Xinpeng Xu ,&nbsp;Lili Kong ,&nbsp;Yitao Zhang ,&nbsp;Lei Zhang ,&nbsp;Lichun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The application of controlled-release urea (CRU) has become an important practice to increase maize yield and nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) with one-time fertilization management. The appropriate ratios and application effects of combinations of regular urea and CRU with different N-release periods (U–CRU) may vary because of regional climate and crop specificity. A three-year (2019–2021) field experiment was conducted in the northeastern region of China to investigate the effects of U–CRU on maize yield, NUE, changes in soil inorganic N content, and apparent N loss. With N fertilizer applied at 210 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>, two types of CRU with release periods of 60 days (CRUa) and 90 days (CRUb) were mixed with regular urea in four different combinations: CRU1 (Urea 40 % + CRUa 60 %), CRU2 (Urea 40 % + CRUa 40 % + CRUb 20 %), CRU3 (Urea 40 % + CRUa 20 % + CRUb 40 %), CRU4 (Urea 40 % + CRUb 60 %). The controls were Urea (U) only and no N fertilizer application (N0). Compared with U, all U–CRU treatments significantly increased soil inorganic N contents (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>–N, 1.4–7.0 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>; NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>–N, 0.3–1.3 mg kg<sup>–1</sup>) in the 0–20 cm soil layer from twelfth-leaf (V12) to physiological maturity (PM) stages of maize. Furthermore, U–CRU treatments increased N uptake from silking (R1) to PM stages and therefore contributed to grain N accumulation which increased 17.1–30.9 % and improved N recovery efficiency (REN), which increased by 8.1–13.1 %. Associated with increases in quantity of ears and 100-grain weight, maize yield increased by 12.2–18.9 % in CRU3, with the increases the highest among treatments. Additionally, compared with U, all U–CRU treatments significantly reduced the inorganic N content in the deep soil layer (40–100 cm) and the lowest apparent N loss was in CRU3, decreasing by 93.4 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> compared with that in U. Regression relations between the mixture ratios of CRUs and maize yield, apparent soil N loss, and REN were used to determine that the appropriate ratio of U:CRUa:CRUb to attain high maize yield and NUE was 40 %:18.6–24.6 %:35.4–41.4 %. Therefore, determining the optimum mixture ratios of CRUs can increase maize yield and NUE while reducing the risk of N loss in continuous maize cropping systems. The results provide a scientific basis for N fertilizer management in spring maize production in northeastern China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124001898","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of controlled-release urea (CRU) has become an important practice to increase maize yield and nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) with one-time fertilization management. The appropriate ratios and application effects of combinations of regular urea and CRU with different N-release periods (U–CRU) may vary because of regional climate and crop specificity. A three-year (2019–2021) field experiment was conducted in the northeastern region of China to investigate the effects of U–CRU on maize yield, NUE, changes in soil inorganic N content, and apparent N loss. With N fertilizer applied at 210 kg ha–1, two types of CRU with release periods of 60 days (CRUa) and 90 days (CRUb) were mixed with regular urea in four different combinations: CRU1 (Urea 40 % + CRUa 60 %), CRU2 (Urea 40 % + CRUa 40 % + CRUb 20 %), CRU3 (Urea 40 % + CRUa 20 % + CRUb 40 %), CRU4 (Urea 40 % + CRUb 60 %). The controls were Urea (U) only and no N fertilizer application (N0). Compared with U, all U–CRU treatments significantly increased soil inorganic N contents (NO3–N, 1.4–7.0 mg kg–1; NH4+–N, 0.3–1.3 mg kg–1) in the 0–20 cm soil layer from twelfth-leaf (V12) to physiological maturity (PM) stages of maize. Furthermore, U–CRU treatments increased N uptake from silking (R1) to PM stages and therefore contributed to grain N accumulation which increased 17.1–30.9 % and improved N recovery efficiency (REN), which increased by 8.1–13.1 %. Associated with increases in quantity of ears and 100-grain weight, maize yield increased by 12.2–18.9 % in CRU3, with the increases the highest among treatments. Additionally, compared with U, all U–CRU treatments significantly reduced the inorganic N content in the deep soil layer (40–100 cm) and the lowest apparent N loss was in CRU3, decreasing by 93.4 kg ha–1 compared with that in U. Regression relations between the mixture ratios of CRUs and maize yield, apparent soil N loss, and REN were used to determine that the appropriate ratio of U:CRUa:CRUb to attain high maize yield and NUE was 40 %:18.6–24.6 %:35.4–41.4 %. Therefore, determining the optimum mixture ratios of CRUs can increase maize yield and NUE while reducing the risk of N loss in continuous maize cropping systems. The results provide a scientific basis for N fertilizer management in spring maize production in northeastern China.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合可变时间控释尿素配方提高中国东北地区春玉米产量并减少氮损失
施用控释尿素(CRU)已成为通过一次性施肥管理提高玉米产量和氮(NUE)利用效率的重要方法。由于地区气候和作物的特殊性,不同氮释放期(U-CRU)的常规尿素和控释尿素组合的适当比例和施用效果可能会有所不同。在中国东北地区开展了一项为期三年(2019-2021 年)的田间试验,以研究 U-CRU 对玉米产量、氮利用效率、土壤无机氮含量变化和表观氮损失的影响。在氮肥施用量为 210 千克/公顷的条件下,将释放期为 60 天(CRUa)和 90 天(CRUb)的两种 CRU 与普通尿素混合,形成四种不同的组合:CRU1(尿素 40 % + CRUa 60 %)、CRU2(尿素 40 % + CRUa 40 % + CRUb 20 %)、CRU3(尿素 40 % + CRUa 20 % + CRUb 40 %)、CRU4(尿素 40 % + CRUb 60 %)。对照组为只施尿素(U)和不施氮肥(N0)。与尿素相比,所有尿素-CRU处理都能显著提高玉米十二叶期(V12)至生理成熟期(PM)0-20厘米土层中的土壤无机氮含量(NO3--N,1.4-7.0 毫克/千克-1;NH4+-N,0.3-1.3 毫克/千克-1)。此外,U-CRU 处理增加了玉米从吐丝期(R1)到成熟期对氮的吸收,因此促进了籽粒氮的积累,增加了 17.1-30.9%,并提高了氮的回收效率(REN),增加了 8.1-13.1%。随着穗数和百粒重的增加,CRU3 的玉米产量增加了 12.2-18.9%,在所有处理中增幅最大。此外,与 U 相比,所有 U-CRU 处理都显著降低了土壤深层(40-100 厘米)的无机氮含量,其中 CRU3 的表观氮损失最低,比 U 减少了 93.4 千克/公顷。根据 CRU 混合比与玉米产量、土壤表观失氮量和 REN 之间的回归关系,可以确定 U:CRUa:CRUb 与玉米产量和 NUE 之间的适宜比例为 40 %:18.6-24.6 %:35.4-41.4 %。因此,确定 CRU 的最佳混合比例可以提高玉米产量和氮利用效率,同时降低玉米连作系统的氮损失风险。研究结果为东北地区春玉米生产中的氮肥管理提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the temperature sensitivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield and its components in China using the CERES-Rice model Citrus pose estimation under complex orchard environment for robotic harvesting Shallow drains and straw mulch alleviate multiple constraints to increase sunflower yield on a clay-textured saline soil I. Effects of decreased soil salinity, waterlogging and end-of-season drought Understanding increased grain yield and water use efficiency by plastic mulch from water input to harvest index for dryland maize in China’s Loess Plateau Growth conditions but not the variety, affect the yield, seed oil and meal protein of camelina under Mediterranean conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1