Understanding aberrant driving intentions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: Literature review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.005
Abderrahim El Hafidy , Taoufik Rachad , Ali Idri
{"title":"Understanding aberrant driving intentions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: Literature review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Abderrahim El Hafidy ,&nbsp;Taoufik Rachad ,&nbsp;Ali Idri","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction</em>: Despite deployed efforts to establish strict road safety standards, human factors is still the leading cause of road crashes. To identify determinants of driver’s behavior, TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) is widely used as a prominent theory of behavior change. However, the existence of different aberrant driving behaviors (decision errors, recognition errors, violations, and physical condition related errors) and several studies using TPB to understand driving behavior, makes it important to conduct a literature review and a <em>meta</em>-analysis of existing studies to use their results in effective driving behavior change interventions. <em>Method:</em> The selection process provided 125 relevant studies that were published between 1991 and 2022, and that used TPB for the understanding of aberrant driving behavior. Five fundamental research questions were defined to identify information to be discovered from the literature review and from the <em>meta</em>-analysis. <em>Results:</em> In addition to the standard TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control), past behavior, moral norms, and descriptive norms were used in studies for a more comprehensive understanding of aberrant driving intention. This analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between aberrant driving intentions and past behavior. Also, moral norms construct was correlated with violations and recognition errors, whereas descriptive norms construct was correlated just with recognition errors. <em>Conclusions:</em> The results of this study highlight the strength of TPB in the prediction of aberrant driving intention and its potential effectiveness to guide interventions aimed at changing aberrant driving behaviors. The study contributes to the comprehension of the relevant psychological factors influencing the engagement of drivers in each category of aberrant driving behaviors<strong>.</strong> <em>Practical Applications</em>: Researchers can use the results of this study to select the relevant psychological factors adapted to their interventions of driving behavior change. The results of the <em>meta</em>-analysis can also be used in the prediction of driver’s intentions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 225-243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite deployed efforts to establish strict road safety standards, human factors is still the leading cause of road crashes. To identify determinants of driver’s behavior, TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) is widely used as a prominent theory of behavior change. However, the existence of different aberrant driving behaviors (decision errors, recognition errors, violations, and physical condition related errors) and several studies using TPB to understand driving behavior, makes it important to conduct a literature review and a meta-analysis of existing studies to use their results in effective driving behavior change interventions. Method: The selection process provided 125 relevant studies that were published between 1991 and 2022, and that used TPB for the understanding of aberrant driving behavior. Five fundamental research questions were defined to identify information to be discovered from the literature review and from the meta-analysis. Results: In addition to the standard TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control), past behavior, moral norms, and descriptive norms were used in studies for a more comprehensive understanding of aberrant driving intention. This analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between aberrant driving intentions and past behavior. Also, moral norms construct was correlated with violations and recognition errors, whereas descriptive norms construct was correlated just with recognition errors. Conclusions: The results of this study highlight the strength of TPB in the prediction of aberrant driving intention and its potential effectiveness to guide interventions aimed at changing aberrant driving behaviors. The study contributes to the comprehension of the relevant psychological factors influencing the engagement of drivers in each category of aberrant driving behaviors. Practical Applications: Researchers can use the results of this study to select the relevant psychological factors adapted to their interventions of driving behavior change. The results of the meta-analysis can also be used in the prediction of driver’s intentions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于计划行为理论理解异常驾驶意图:文献综述和元分析
导言:尽管已部署努力建立严格的道路安全标准,但人为因素仍是造成道路交通事故的主要原因。为了确定驾驶员行为的决定因素,TPB(计划行为理论)作为一种著名的行为改变理论被广泛使用。然而,由于存在不同的异常驾驶行为(决策错误、识别错误、违规行为和与身体状况相关的错误),且有多项研究使用 TPB 理解驾驶行为,因此有必要对现有研究进行文献综述和荟萃分析,以便将其结果用于有效的驾驶行为改变干预措施。方法:筛选过程提供了 125 项相关研究,这些研究发表于 1991 年至 2022 年之间,使用了 TPB 来理解异常驾驶行为。界定了五个基本研究问题,以确定从文献综述和荟萃分析中发现的信息。研究结果除了标准的 TPB 构建(态度、主观规范和感知行为控制)外,研究中还使用了过去行为、道德规范和描述性规范,以便更全面地了解异常驾驶意图。分析表明,异常驾驶意向与过去行为之间存在明显的相关性。此外,道德规范结构与违规行为和识别错误相关,而描述性规范结构仅与识别错误相关。结论:本研究的结果凸显了 TPB 在预测异常驾驶意图方面的优势,以及其在指导旨在改变异常驾驶行为的干预措施方面的潜在有效性。本研究有助于理解影响驾驶者参与各类异常驾驶行为的相关心理因素。实际应用:研究人员可以利用本研究的结果,选择适合其驾驶行为改变干预的相关心理因素。荟萃分析的结果还可用于预测驾驶者的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019 Safety climate and fatigue have differential impacts on safety issues Great to use as a conversation starter: End user views on the acceptability and feasibility of a prototype decision aid for older drivers Investigating perspectives towards online content that promotes road safety: A qualitative study across three age groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1