Dr. Andres Flores-Hidalgo , Dr. Fatima Aly , Dr. James Phero , Dr. Deepak Krishnan , Dr. Ricardo Padilla
{"title":"RNA-Sequencing of the Microenvironment of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders","authors":"Dr. Andres Flores-Hidalgo , Dr. Fatima Aly , Dr. James Phero , Dr. Deepak Krishnan , Dr. Ricardo Padilla","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.04.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>the persistent issue in the diagnostic separation between OLP and OED is the considerable clinical and histologic overlap between the two entities. The differentiation is currently based on relatively subjective evaluation of the histological findings by the examining pathologist taking into account the clinical presentation. Although direct immunofluorescence studies can help diagnose OLP, DIF has to be correlated with the appropriate clinical presentation and permanent sections, as basement membrane fibrinogen deposition is not pathognomonic of OLP and has been described in OED specimens and other mimickers. Thus, discrimination of OED associated with chronic interface mucositis from OLP with reactive cellular atypia can be challenging, requiring subjective assessment of ostensibly objective morphologic features.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We performed bulk RNA sequencing on all the samples to evaluate genetic markers previously described in tumor-infiltrating immune cells and compare between groups. Gene ontology and enrichment analysis were performed to explore the function and product of differential gene expressions in both study groups. The p-value of <0.05 and fold change >1.3 was set for this purpose, utilizing the Gene Ontology knowledgebase by the Gene Ontology Consortium (release date 2023-01-05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Functional analysis revealed enrichment of immune signatures associated with immunosurveillance, lymphocyte infiltration, cytotoxic response, and surrogate markers of tumor-associated macrophages in high-grade OED. In OLP, our data revealed differential gene expression mainly related to cell regulation process, lymphocyte infiltration, and pathways related to T-cell regulation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Immune reactivity is prominent in both epithelial and connective tissue components of OED and OLP. Nonetheless, our data suggests that the phenotype and genetic markers in the immune component are different. Further studies, including more cases and single-cell RNA sequencing, are necessary to substantiate these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324002335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
the persistent issue in the diagnostic separation between OLP and OED is the considerable clinical and histologic overlap between the two entities. The differentiation is currently based on relatively subjective evaluation of the histological findings by the examining pathologist taking into account the clinical presentation. Although direct immunofluorescence studies can help diagnose OLP, DIF has to be correlated with the appropriate clinical presentation and permanent sections, as basement membrane fibrinogen deposition is not pathognomonic of OLP and has been described in OED specimens and other mimickers. Thus, discrimination of OED associated with chronic interface mucositis from OLP with reactive cellular atypia can be challenging, requiring subjective assessment of ostensibly objective morphologic features.
Materials and Methods
We performed bulk RNA sequencing on all the samples to evaluate genetic markers previously described in tumor-infiltrating immune cells and compare between groups. Gene ontology and enrichment analysis were performed to explore the function and product of differential gene expressions in both study groups. The p-value of <0.05 and fold change >1.3 was set for this purpose, utilizing the Gene Ontology knowledgebase by the Gene Ontology Consortium (release date 2023-01-05).
Results
Functional analysis revealed enrichment of immune signatures associated with immunosurveillance, lymphocyte infiltration, cytotoxic response, and surrogate markers of tumor-associated macrophages in high-grade OED. In OLP, our data revealed differential gene expression mainly related to cell regulation process, lymphocyte infiltration, and pathways related to T-cell regulation.
Conclusions
Immune reactivity is prominent in both epithelial and connective tissue components of OED and OLP. Nonetheless, our data suggests that the phenotype and genetic markers in the immune component are different. Further studies, including more cases and single-cell RNA sequencing, are necessary to substantiate these findings.
导言:OLP和OED在诊断上一直存在的问题是,这两种疾病在临床和组织学上有很大的重叠。目前的鉴别方法是由病理学家结合临床表现对组织学结果进行相对主观的评估。虽然直接免疫荧光研究可帮助诊断 OLP,但 DIF 必须与适当的临床表现和永久切片相关联,因为基底膜纤维蛋白原沉积并不是 OLP 的病理特征,而且在 OED 标本和其他模仿者中也有描述。因此,将伴有慢性界面粘膜炎的 OED 与伴有反应性细胞不典型性的 OLP 区分开来可能具有挑战性,需要对表面上客观的形态学特征进行主观评估。我们进行了基因本体和富集分析,以探索两组研究中不同基因表达的功能和产物。结果功能分析显示,在高级别 OED 中,与免疫监视、淋巴细胞浸润、细胞毒性反应和肿瘤相关巨噬细胞的替代标记物相关的免疫标志物出现了富集。在 OLP 中,我们的数据揭示了主要与细胞调节过程、淋巴细胞浸润和 T 细胞调节相关通路有关的不同基因表达。然而,我们的数据表明,免疫成分的表型和遗传标记是不同的。要证实这些发现,还需要进一步的研究,包括更多的病例和单细胞 RNA 测序。