Quantifying the effect of driving restrictions on fine particulate matter concentrations with WRF-Chem model: A case study in Kaifeng, China

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101258
Feng Wang , Haopeng Zhang , Xiaoyang Li , Xutong Ru , Hongquan Song
{"title":"Quantifying the effect of driving restrictions on fine particulate matter concentrations with WRF-Chem model: A case study in Kaifeng, China","authors":"Feng Wang ,&nbsp;Haopeng Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Li ,&nbsp;Xutong Ru ,&nbsp;Hongquan Song","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the significant sources of urban air particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>) has been found to be vehicle exhaust emission. Vehicle restriction measures have been taken to alleviate particulate matter pollution in the world. Here, we quantified the impact of vehicle restriction measures on the PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) in Kaifeng, China. This study set up three different scenarios to simulate the spatiotemporal changes of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations in four seasons in 2020. They were no emission reduction (S0), the restriction of two tailing license plate numbers (S1), and the restriction of odd–even tailing numbers of license plates (S2), respectively. In general, the odd–even license plate restriction policy has proven to be more effective than restricting two specific license plate numbers. In scenario S1, the range of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations reduction in Kaifeng City was between 0.2% and 1.28%. In scenario S2, the range of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations reduction was between 0.98% and 14.42%. The results showed that the effectiveness of vehicle restriction measures varies from season to season, and the effect in summer and winter is better than that in spring and autumn. We suggest that it may be difficult to reduce the PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations to a great extent if simply reducing the traffic exhaust emissions through motor vehicle restrictions, on the contrary, would lead to the increase of O<sub>3</sub> concentration, bringing some other effects. This study can serve as a foundation for the rational development of motor vehicle control strategies and help advance the ongoing improvement of air quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 101258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the significant sources of urban air particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) has been found to be vehicle exhaust emission. Vehicle restriction measures have been taken to alleviate particulate matter pollution in the world. Here, we quantified the impact of vehicle restriction measures on the PM2.5 concentrations using the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) in Kaifeng, China. This study set up three different scenarios to simulate the spatiotemporal changes of PM2.5 concentrations in four seasons in 2020. They were no emission reduction (S0), the restriction of two tailing license plate numbers (S1), and the restriction of odd–even tailing numbers of license plates (S2), respectively. In general, the odd–even license plate restriction policy has proven to be more effective than restricting two specific license plate numbers. In scenario S1, the range of PM2.5 concentrations reduction in Kaifeng City was between 0.2% and 1.28%. In scenario S2, the range of PM2.5 concentrations reduction was between 0.98% and 14.42%. The results showed that the effectiveness of vehicle restriction measures varies from season to season, and the effect in summer and winter is better than that in spring and autumn. We suggest that it may be difficult to reduce the PM2.5 concentrations to a great extent if simply reducing the traffic exhaust emissions through motor vehicle restrictions, on the contrary, would lead to the increase of O3 concentration, bringing some other effects. This study can serve as a foundation for the rational development of motor vehicle control strategies and help advance the ongoing improvement of air quality.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 WRF-Chem 模型量化限行措施对细颗粒物浓度的影响:中国开封案例研究
汽车尾气排放是城市空气颗粒物(PM2.5 和 PM10)的重要来源之一。世界各国纷纷采取汽车限行措施来缓解颗粒物污染。在此,我们利用中国开封的化学气象研究和预报模型(WRF-Chem)量化了汽车限行措施对 PM2.5 浓度的影响。本研究设定了三种不同的情景来模拟2020年四季PM2.5浓度的时空变化。分别为不减排(S0)、限两尾号(S1)和限奇偶尾号(S2)。总体而言,事实证明奇偶车牌限制政策比限制两个特定车牌号更有效。在方案 S1 中,开封市 PM2.5 浓度的下降范围在 0.2% 到 1.28% 之间。在方案 S2 中,PM2.5 浓度的下降范围在 0.98% 到 14.42% 之间。结果表明,车辆限行措施的效果因季节而异,夏季和冬季的效果优于春季和秋季。我们认为,如果单纯通过机动车限行措施减少交通尾气排放,可能难以大幅度降低 PM2.5 浓度,反而会导致 O3 浓度上升,带来其他一些影响。本研究可作为合理制定机动车控制策略的基础,有助于推进空气质量的持续改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the operational and economic impact of the introduction of S-100 and e-Navigation within shipping companies Pedestrian crossing behavior in social groups: Exploring cultural contexts through a comparative study Incorporation of Q method into DEA cross-efficiency: A case study on airport assessment Capacited range coverage location model for electric vehicle charging stations: A case of Istanbul-Ankara highway Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1