Impact of irreversible electroporation on survival among patients with borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A single center experience

Mohammed O. Suraju , Yutao Su , Jeremy Chang , Aditi Katwala , Apoorve Nayyar , Darren M. Gordon , Scott K. Sherman , Hisakazu Hoshi , James R. Howe , Carlos H.F. Chan
{"title":"Impact of irreversible electroporation on survival among patients with borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A single center experience","authors":"Mohammed O. Suraju ,&nbsp;Yutao Su ,&nbsp;Jeremy Chang ,&nbsp;Aditi Katwala ,&nbsp;Apoorve Nayyar ,&nbsp;Darren M. Gordon ,&nbsp;Scott K. Sherman ,&nbsp;Hisakazu Hoshi ,&nbsp;James R. Howe ,&nbsp;Carlos H.F. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2024.100075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The use of Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) in borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing. However, its potential impact on survival has been debated. We hypothesized that addition of IRE to the conventional multimodal therapy would be associated with improved overall survival (OS) in BR/LA PDAC patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Among patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we identified PDAC patients with BR/LA disease who underwent resection alone, resection+IRE, IRE alone, and no resection but would have been eligible for IRE. Kaplan-Meier method with Peto-Peto modified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard were used in survival analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>102 patients were included in the cohort – 40 resection-only (18 % LA), 13 resection+IRE (46 % LA), 14 IRE-only (93 % LA), and 35 unresected (77 % LA). Median age was 65. IRE patients had a median follow-up of 22 months [95 %CI:14–28], while for non-IRE patients it was 17 months [95 %CI:12–26]. Median age and proportion without comorbidities did not significantly differ across groups. Median OS was 30 months [95 %CI:30-NR] among patients who underwent resection+IRE, 27 months [95 %CI:23–48] for resection-only, 28 months [95 %CI:16-NR] for IRE-only, and 14 months [95 %CI:10–20] for unresected patients. In multivariable analyses, resection (HR:0.26 [95 %CI:0.13–0.54], <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (HR:0.50 [95 %CI:0.28–0.88], <em>P</em> = 0.017), and IRE (HR:0.49 [95 %CI:0.26–0.94], <em>P</em> = 0.03) were independently associated with decreased risk of mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IRE may enhance survival in BR/LA PDAC patients who receive conventional multimodal therapy. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential benefits of IRE as an adjunct during pancreatic resection after multimodal neoadjuvant therapy for BR/LA PDAC.</p></div><div><h3>Synopsis</h3><p>Irreversible electroporation can be a valuable adjunct to the current multimodal therapy for treating borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000847/pdfft?md5=579a9caf5cd707c0b3ca943b58830539&pid=1-s2.0-S2950247024000847-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247024000847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) in borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing. However, its potential impact on survival has been debated. We hypothesized that addition of IRE to the conventional multimodal therapy would be associated with improved overall survival (OS) in BR/LA PDAC patients.

Methods

Among patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we identified PDAC patients with BR/LA disease who underwent resection alone, resection+IRE, IRE alone, and no resection but would have been eligible for IRE. Kaplan-Meier method with Peto-Peto modified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard were used in survival analyses.

Results

102 patients were included in the cohort – 40 resection-only (18 % LA), 13 resection+IRE (46 % LA), 14 IRE-only (93 % LA), and 35 unresected (77 % LA). Median age was 65. IRE patients had a median follow-up of 22 months [95 %CI:14–28], while for non-IRE patients it was 17 months [95 %CI:12–26]. Median age and proportion without comorbidities did not significantly differ across groups. Median OS was 30 months [95 %CI:30-NR] among patients who underwent resection+IRE, 27 months [95 %CI:23–48] for resection-only, 28 months [95 %CI:16-NR] for IRE-only, and 14 months [95 %CI:10–20] for unresected patients. In multivariable analyses, resection (HR:0.26 [95 %CI:0.13–0.54], P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemoradiation (HR:0.50 [95 %CI:0.28–0.88], P = 0.017), and IRE (HR:0.49 [95 %CI:0.26–0.94], P = 0.03) were independently associated with decreased risk of mortality.

Conclusions

IRE may enhance survival in BR/LA PDAC patients who receive conventional multimodal therapy. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential benefits of IRE as an adjunct during pancreatic resection after multimodal neoadjuvant therapy for BR/LA PDAC.

Synopsis

Irreversible electroporation can be a valuable adjunct to the current multimodal therapy for treating borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不可逆电穿孔术对边缘可切除/局部晚期胰腺癌患者生存期的影响:单中心经验
背景不可逆电穿孔术(IRE)在边缘可切除(BR)和局部晚期(LA)胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的应用日益增多。然而,其对存活率的潜在影响一直存在争议。在接受新辅助化疗的患者中,我们发现了患有 BR/LA 疾病的 PDAC 患者,他们分别接受了单纯切除术、切除术+IRE、单纯 IRE 以及未接受切除术但符合 IRE 治疗条件。结果102例患者被纳入队列--40例单纯切除(18% LA)、13例切除+IRE(46% LA)、14例单纯IRE(93% LA)和35例未切除(77% LA)。中位年龄为 65 岁。IRE患者的中位随访时间为22个月[95%CI:14-28],而非IRE患者的中位随访时间为17个月[95%CI:12-26]。各组患者的中位年龄和无合并症的比例无明显差异。接受切除+IRE的患者中位OS为30个月[95 %CI:30-NR],仅接受切除的患者为27个月[95 %CI:23-48],仅接受IRE的患者为28个月[95 %CI:16-NR],未接受切除的患者为14个月[95 %CI:10-20]。在多变量分析中,切除(HR:0.26 [95 %CI:0.13-0.54], P < 0.001)、新辅助化疗(HR:0.50 [95 %CI:0.28-0.88], P = 0.017)和IRE(HR:0.49 [95 %CI:0.26-0.结论IRE可提高接受常规多模式治疗的BR/LA PDAC患者的生存率。需要进行前瞻性研究,以证实 IRE 作为 BR/LA PDAC 多模式新辅助治疗后胰腺切除术的辅助手段可能带来的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining liver-directed and immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A review and future directions Timing of breast biopsy and axillary ultrasound does not affect the false positive rate of the axillary ultrasound Small bowel cancers: A population-based analysis of epidemiology, treatment and outcomes in Ontario, Canada from 2005-2020 Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori: Serum biomarkers for gastric cancer risk in a diverse United States population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1