Prognostic factors for patients with T2/T3 gallbladder cancer: Does extent of resection matter?

Surgical Oncology Insight Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.soi.2025.100126
Stacy Goins , Kristen E. Rhodin , Austin M. Eckhoff , Michela Fabricius , Allison N. Martin , Daniel P. Nussbaum , Garth Herbert , Kevin N. Shah , Sabino Zani , Dan G. Blazer , Peter J. Allen , Michael E. Lidsky
{"title":"Prognostic factors for patients with T2/T3 gallbladder cancer: Does extent of resection matter?","authors":"Stacy Goins ,&nbsp;Kristen E. Rhodin ,&nbsp;Austin M. Eckhoff ,&nbsp;Michela Fabricius ,&nbsp;Allison N. Martin ,&nbsp;Daniel P. Nussbaum ,&nbsp;Garth Herbert ,&nbsp;Kevin N. Shah ,&nbsp;Sabino Zani ,&nbsp;Dan G. Blazer ,&nbsp;Peter J. Allen ,&nbsp;Michael E. Lidsky","doi":"10.1016/j.soi.2025.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gallbladder cancer (GBC) portends a poor prognosis, and guidelines recommend radical cholecystectomy for patients with T1b and greater disease. We evaluated prognostic factors for T2 and T3 GBC among a contemporary cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with resected pathologic T2 and T3 GBC from 2004 to 2018. Patients were stratified by extent of resection: simple (SC) vs radical cholecystectomy (RC). Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Altogether, 10,107 patients (6426 [63.6 %] T2; 3681 [36.4 %] T3) were identified: 2203 (21.8 %) underwent SC and 7904 (78.2 %) RC. Patients with SC were more likely to have T2 disease, negative nodes, and positive margins. Tumor grade, node positivity, margin positivity, and T3 stage were associated with greater mortality. Treatment at an academic center and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved survival. Extent of surgical resection was not associated with OS in unadjusted and adjusted analyses (adjusted HR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.92–1.05, p = 0.62).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Outcomes for patients with resected T2 and T3 GBC remain poor, though these retrospective data suggest RC is not associated with better OS. Multidisciplinary management and prospective investigation are needed to advance outcomes and facilitate selection of patients who may benefit from radical resection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101191,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology Insight","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950247025000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) portends a poor prognosis, and guidelines recommend radical cholecystectomy for patients with T1b and greater disease. We evaluated prognostic factors for T2 and T3 GBC among a contemporary cohort.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with resected pathologic T2 and T3 GBC from 2004 to 2018. Patients were stratified by extent of resection: simple (SC) vs radical cholecystectomy (RC). Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods.

Results

Altogether, 10,107 patients (6426 [63.6 %] T2; 3681 [36.4 %] T3) were identified: 2203 (21.8 %) underwent SC and 7904 (78.2 %) RC. Patients with SC were more likely to have T2 disease, negative nodes, and positive margins. Tumor grade, node positivity, margin positivity, and T3 stage were associated with greater mortality. Treatment at an academic center and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved survival. Extent of surgical resection was not associated with OS in unadjusted and adjusted analyses (adjusted HR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.92–1.05, p = 0.62).

Discussion

Outcomes for patients with resected T2 and T3 GBC remain poor, though these retrospective data suggest RC is not associated with better OS. Multidisciplinary management and prospective investigation are needed to advance outcomes and facilitate selection of patients who may benefit from radical resection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
T2/T3胆囊癌患者的预后因素:切除程度重要吗?
胆囊癌(GBC)预示着预后不良,指南建议对T1b及更严重疾病的患者进行根治性胆囊切除术。我们在一个当代队列中评估了T2和T3 GBC的预后因素。方法查询2004 - 2018年病理切除的T2和T3 GBC患者的国家癌症数据库(NCDB)。根据切除程度对患者进行分层:单纯(SC)和根治性胆囊切除术(RC)。采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox比例风险法比较总生存期(OS)。结果共10107例(6426例[63.6 %]T2;其中,2203例(21.8% %)行SC, 7904例(78.2% %)行RC。SC患者更容易出现T2病变、阴性淋巴结和阳性边缘。肿瘤分级、淋巴结阳性、边缘阳性和T3分期与较高的死亡率相关。在学术中心接受治疗和接受辅助化疗与生存率的提高有关。在未调整和调整分析中,手术切除程度与OS无关(调整后危险度0.98,95 % CI 0.92-1.05, p = 0.62)。切除T2和T3 GBC患者的预后仍然很差,尽管这些回顾性数据表明RC与更好的OS无关。需要多学科管理和前瞻性调查来提高预后,并方便选择可能从根治性切除术中受益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contemporary survivorship care patterns for melanoma patients in Ontario, Canada: variability and opportunity National trends in emergency and non-emergency colorectal cancer resections across the COVID-19 pandemic Intraoperative carcinoid crisis in NET operations – Eluding Dogma with current understanding Elevated core body temperature during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy does not impact postoperative outcomes Society of surgical oncology medical student & trainee primer for hepatopancreatobiliary surgical oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1