A new approach to counting fossil and modern pollen grains: The orderly count

IF 1.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 PALEONTOLOGY Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2024.105156
Tutku Tuncalı Yaman , Bikem Ekberzade , Hülya Caner , Ruya Y. Dagdeviren , Sena Inkaya , Nurgul K. Kılıc , Suzanne A.G. Leroy , Fabienne Marret , Cetin Senkul , Jessie Woodbridge , Meral Avci
{"title":"A new approach to counting fossil and modern pollen grains: The orderly count","authors":"Tutku Tuncalı Yaman ,&nbsp;Bikem Ekberzade ,&nbsp;Hülya Caner ,&nbsp;Ruya Y. Dagdeviren ,&nbsp;Sena Inkaya ,&nbsp;Nurgul K. Kılıc ,&nbsp;Suzanne A.G. Leroy ,&nbsp;Fabienne Marret ,&nbsp;Cetin Senkul ,&nbsp;Jessie Woodbridge ,&nbsp;Meral Avci","doi":"10.1016/j.revpalbo.2024.105156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Palynology, the study of pollen and spores, plays a crucial role in various scientific disciplines, including earth sciences (paleovegetation and paleoclimatology), botany, allergy, archaeology, forensic sciencs and cosmetics. This study delves into the critical question in fossil pollen analysis studies: the minimum count of pollen grains required for accurate estimation of vegetation composition. Various statistical methods have been proposed over the years to address this question. Our research introduces an alternative technique, the orderly count, tailored to the nature of palynological analysis. We apply this method to diverse sediment catchments, including peat bogs, marine and lake sediments, from different geographical locations. Additionally, we revisit the reliability coefficients and propose adjustments for more accurate results. Our findings suggest that relying on statistical methods without considering the specific characteristics of palynological data may lead to low reliability. We advocate for the integration of dissimilarity criteria and the orderly count in sample size assessments for enhanced accuracy in palynological analyses. Our study emphasizes the importance of choosing appropriate methodologies aligned with the unique aspects of palynology to ensure robust and reliable results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54488,"journal":{"name":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034666724001076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Palynology, the study of pollen and spores, plays a crucial role in various scientific disciplines, including earth sciences (paleovegetation and paleoclimatology), botany, allergy, archaeology, forensic sciencs and cosmetics. This study delves into the critical question in fossil pollen analysis studies: the minimum count of pollen grains required for accurate estimation of vegetation composition. Various statistical methods have been proposed over the years to address this question. Our research introduces an alternative technique, the orderly count, tailored to the nature of palynological analysis. We apply this method to diverse sediment catchments, including peat bogs, marine and lake sediments, from different geographical locations. Additionally, we revisit the reliability coefficients and propose adjustments for more accurate results. Our findings suggest that relying on statistical methods without considering the specific characteristics of palynological data may lead to low reliability. We advocate for the integration of dissimilarity criteria and the orderly count in sample size assessments for enhanced accuracy in palynological analyses. Our study emphasizes the importance of choosing appropriate methodologies aligned with the unique aspects of palynology to ensure robust and reliable results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算化石和现代花粉粒的新方法:有序计数
古植物学是对花粉和孢子的研究,在地球科学(古植被学和古气候学)、植物学、过敏学、考古学、法医学和化妆品等多个科学学科中发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究探讨了化石花粉分析研究中的关键问题:准确估算植被组成所需的最少花粉粒数量。多年来,人们提出了各种统计方法来解决这一问题。我们的研究针对古生物学分析的性质,引入了另一种技术--有序计数法。我们将这种方法应用于不同地理位置的各种沉积物集水区,包括泥炭沼泽、海洋和湖泊沉积物。此外,我们还重新审视了可靠性系数,并提出了调整建议,以获得更准确的结果。我们的研究结果表明,依赖统计方法而不考虑古生物学数据的具体特征可能会导致可靠性较低。我们主张在样本量评估中结合相似性标准和有序计数,以提高古生物学分析的准确性。我们的研究强调了根据古乐学的独特性选择适当方法的重要性,以确保获得稳健可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology is an international journal for articles in all fields of palaeobotany and palynology dealing with all groups, ranging from marine palynomorphs to higher land plants. Original contributions and comprehensive review papers should appeal to an international audience. Typical topics include but are not restricted to systematics, evolution, palaeobiology, palaeoecology, biostratigraphy, biochronology, palaeoclimatology, paleogeography, taphonomy, palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, vegetation history, and practical applications of palaeobotany and palynology, e.g. in coal and petroleum geology and archaeology. The journal especially encourages the publication of articles in which palaeobotany and palynology are applied for solving fundamental geological and biological problems as well as innovative and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Reevaluation of pollen differentiation in Altingiaceae: Challenges in distinguishing deciduous (Liquidambar) and evergreen (Altingia) types using multivariate statistics and machine learning Modern pollen distribution along a Himalayan elevation gradient in Central Nepal The Carboniferous spore genus Vestispora: New palynological insights from Gondwana Editorial Board Tracing 40,000 years of vegetation change in the Baetic-Rifan biodiversity hotspot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1