Assessing the implications of using RDTS in donor blood screening for transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs): analysis of trans-in donor blood at a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific African Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02313
Renosten Edem Tetteh , Evelyn Akosua Yeboaa , Wisdom Yayra Morganu-Dogbey , Emmanuel Ativi , Francis Bigoja , Elom Yawa Dzefi , Patrick Komla Affrim , Prosper Mensah , Precious Kwablah Kwadzokpui
{"title":"Assessing the implications of using RDTS in donor blood screening for transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs): analysis of trans-in donor blood at a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana","authors":"Renosten Edem Tetteh ,&nbsp;Evelyn Akosua Yeboaa ,&nbsp;Wisdom Yayra Morganu-Dogbey ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Ativi ,&nbsp;Francis Bigoja ,&nbsp;Elom Yawa Dzefi ,&nbsp;Patrick Komla Affrim ,&nbsp;Prosper Mensah ,&nbsp;Precious Kwablah Kwadzokpui","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Blood transfusion is a critical hemotherapeutic intervention. However, the widespread utilization of Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) methods in screening potential donors for TTIs poses a serious public health challenge. We investigated the prevalence of TTIs in donor blood units that were transported from external health facilities (Trans-in blood) to Ho Teaching Hospital for critical care.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We adopted a cross-sectional design to investigate 727 units of Trans-in blood at the Ho Teaching Hospital's blood bank between January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022. An <em>apriori-developed</em> data capture form was used to collect the data for this study. The chi-square test and Cramer's V or Phi were used to assess the association between variables of interest. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between TTIs and donor's blood groups whereas spatial visualization was employed to present the distribution of missed TTIs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall prevalence of missed TTIs was 6.19 % (95 % CI: 4.66–8.18), comprising missed HIV, HBV, and Syphilis infection rates of 1.79 % (95 % CI: 1.72–1.86), 1.24 % (95 % CI: 1.17–1.31), and 3.16 % (95 % CI: 3.09–3.23), respectively. There was a higher rate of missed HIV infections in 2022 (2.04 %, 95 % CI: 1.04–3.97) compared to 2021 (1.49 %, 95 % CI: 0.64–3.45), and a decline in the rates of missed HBV and Syphilis infection within the period. The prevalence of TTI was highest among donors with ABO blood group 'O' (68.89 %, 95 % CI: 54.34–80.47) and Rh 'D' Positive blood group (95.56 %, 95 % CI: 85.17–98.77). Compared to donors with blood group O, non-O donors had 4.53 times the odds (95 % CI: 1.12–18.27; p-value=0.034) of missed HBV infection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The observed prevalence of missed TTIs highlights potential gaps in current screening practices, posing a significant public health concern. Efforts made to clamp down on the spread of these infections within the population may be impeded if the current trend of missed TTIs continues. Further studies on a larger scale with more comprehensive data are advised to better appreciate the public health implications of missed TTIs in Ghana.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624002576/pdfft?md5=f0e08049359b51ab376410d433c09208&pid=1-s2.0-S2468227624002576-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624002576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Blood transfusion is a critical hemotherapeutic intervention. However, the widespread utilization of Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) methods in screening potential donors for TTIs poses a serious public health challenge. We investigated the prevalence of TTIs in donor blood units that were transported from external health facilities (Trans-in blood) to Ho Teaching Hospital for critical care.

Method

We adopted a cross-sectional design to investigate 727 units of Trans-in blood at the Ho Teaching Hospital's blood bank between January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022. An apriori-developed data capture form was used to collect the data for this study. The chi-square test and Cramer's V or Phi were used to assess the association between variables of interest. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between TTIs and donor's blood groups whereas spatial visualization was employed to present the distribution of missed TTIs.

Results

The overall prevalence of missed TTIs was 6.19 % (95 % CI: 4.66–8.18), comprising missed HIV, HBV, and Syphilis infection rates of 1.79 % (95 % CI: 1.72–1.86), 1.24 % (95 % CI: 1.17–1.31), and 3.16 % (95 % CI: 3.09–3.23), respectively. There was a higher rate of missed HIV infections in 2022 (2.04 %, 95 % CI: 1.04–3.97) compared to 2021 (1.49 %, 95 % CI: 0.64–3.45), and a decline in the rates of missed HBV and Syphilis infection within the period. The prevalence of TTI was highest among donors with ABO blood group 'O' (68.89 %, 95 % CI: 54.34–80.47) and Rh 'D' Positive blood group (95.56 %, 95 % CI: 85.17–98.77). Compared to donors with blood group O, non-O donors had 4.53 times the odds (95 % CI: 1.12–18.27; p-value=0.034) of missed HBV infection.

Conclusion

The observed prevalence of missed TTIs highlights potential gaps in current screening practices, posing a significant public health concern. Efforts made to clamp down on the spread of these infections within the population may be impeded if the current trend of missed TTIs continues. Further studies on a larger scale with more comprehensive data are advised to better appreciate the public health implications of missed TTIs in Ghana.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估在献血者血液筛查中使用 RDTS 对输血传播性疾病(TTIs)的影响:对加纳一家三级医院转入献血者血液的分析
背景输血是一项重要的血液治疗措施。然而,广泛使用快速诊断检测(RDT)方法来筛查潜在献血者是否患有输血感染是一项严峻的公共卫生挑战。方法 我们采用横断面设计,调查了 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间何氏教学医院血库的 727 份输血单位。本研究使用事先开发的数据采集表收集数据。采用卡方检验和 Cramer's V 或 Phi 来评估相关变量之间的关联。二元逻辑回归分析用于确定TTI与献血者血型之间的关联,而空间可视化则用于呈现漏检TTI的分布情况。19 % (95 % CI: 4.66-8.18),其中 HIV、HBV 和梅毒的漏检率分别为 1.79 % (95 % CI: 1.72-1.86)、1.24 % (95 % CI: 1.17-1.31) 和 3.16 % (95 % CI: 3.09-3.23)。与 2021 年(1.49 %,95 % CI:0.64-3.45)相比,2022 年的艾滋病病毒感染漏报率较高(2.04 %,95 % CI:1.04-3.97),而同期的乙肝病毒和梅毒感染漏报率有所下降。ABO 血型为 "O "型(68.89%,95% CI:54.34-80.47)和 Rh 血型为 "D "阳性(95.56%,95% CI:85.17-98.77)的献血者中 TTI 感染率最高。与 O 型血献血者相比,非 O 型血献血者漏检 HBV 感染的几率是 O 型血献血者的 4.53 倍(95 % CI:1.12-18.27;P 值=0.034)。如果目前漏检 TTIs 的趋势继续下去,那么遏制这些感染在人群中传播的努力可能会受到阻碍。为了更好地了解加纳漏检 TTIs 对公共卫生的影响,建议开展更大规模、数据更全面的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Oil price shocks and human capital channels in Nigeria Determinants of an extended metric of agricultural commercialization in Ghana Molecular phylogenetic characterization of L-asparaginase-producing endophytic fungi inhabiting Prunus africana and Periploca linearifolia: Effect of incubation time and pH on enzyme production Improvement of the hygrothermal efficiency numerically using CFD modeling in a full-scale ventilated room with Moroccan climates Spatiotemporal climate variability and food security implications in the Central Ethiopia Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1