More urbanization, more polarization: evidence from two decades of urban expansion in China

IF 9.1 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES npj urban sustainability Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1038/s42949-024-00170-z
Yi’na Hu, Dylan Shane Connor, Michelle Stuhlmacher, Jian Peng, B. L. Turner II
{"title":"More urbanization, more polarization: evidence from two decades of urban expansion in China","authors":"Yi’na Hu, Dylan Shane Connor, Michelle Stuhlmacher, Jian Peng, B. L. Turner II","doi":"10.1038/s42949-024-00170-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines whether the patterns of urbanization in China over the past twenty years have resulted in a more balanced or increasingly polarized city size distribution. China is an important study area due to the immense scale of its urbanization and the substantial role of its planners in coordinating and striving for more balanced development patterns. This study utilizes measures of the spatial and temporal characteristics of built-up area (BUA) expansion across 23 urban agglomerations in China, focusing on size dynamics through the urban primacy index and Pareto exponent. The BUA within these 23 UAs increased by 280.90% in the study period. Coastal urban agglomerations were larger in size at baseline and maintained relatively high annual growth rates compared to inland agglomerations, indicating rising polarization. Changes within agglomerations were indicative of declining polarization, as evidenced by the reduction in the urban primacy index and the increase of Pareto exponent. Policies implemented to achieve enhanced urbanization coordination in China appear to be partially successful, but the growth of urban regions with existing large size continues to fuel uneven urban development and polarization.","PeriodicalId":74322,"journal":{"name":"npj urban sustainability","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42949-024-00170-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj urban sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42949-024-00170-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines whether the patterns of urbanization in China over the past twenty years have resulted in a more balanced or increasingly polarized city size distribution. China is an important study area due to the immense scale of its urbanization and the substantial role of its planners in coordinating and striving for more balanced development patterns. This study utilizes measures of the spatial and temporal characteristics of built-up area (BUA) expansion across 23 urban agglomerations in China, focusing on size dynamics through the urban primacy index and Pareto exponent. The BUA within these 23 UAs increased by 280.90% in the study period. Coastal urban agglomerations were larger in size at baseline and maintained relatively high annual growth rates compared to inland agglomerations, indicating rising polarization. Changes within agglomerations were indicative of declining polarization, as evidenced by the reduction in the urban primacy index and the increase of Pareto exponent. Policies implemented to achieve enhanced urbanization coordination in China appear to be partially successful, but the growth of urban regions with existing large size continues to fuel uneven urban development and polarization.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更多城市化,更多两极分化:中国二十年城市扩张的证据
本文探讨了中国过去二十年的城市化模式是导致了城市规模分布更加均衡还是日益两极分化。中国是一个重要的研究区域,因为其城市化规模巨大,而且规划者在协调和努力实现更均衡的发展模式方面发挥着重要作用。本研究利用中国 23 个城市群的建成区扩张的空间和时间特征,通过城市首位度指数和帕累托指数关注城市规模的动态变化。在研究期间,这 23 个城市群的建成区面积增加了 280.90%。与内陆城市群相比,沿海城市群的基线规模更大,并保持着相对较高的年增长率,这表明两极分化正在加剧。城市群内部的变化表明两极分化在下降,城市首位度指数的下降和帕累托指数的上升就是证明。中国为加强城市化协调而实施的政策似乎取得了部分成功,但现有大体量城市区域的增长继续加剧了城市发展的不平衡和两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post construction infrastructural adaptation of social practices in Dhaka’s under flyover spaces More extremely hot days, more heat exposure and fewer cooling options for people of color in Connecticut, U.S. Stakeholders’ perceptions of and willingness to pay for circular economy in the construction sector Accelerating circularity systemically: three directions for impactful research Cross-scale consumption-based simulation models can promote sustainable metropolitan food systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1