Circular strategies for building sector decarbonization in China: A scenario analysis

IF 4.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Industrial Ecology Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1111/jiec.13523
Alessio Mastrucci, Fei Guo, Xiaoyang Zhong, Florian Maczek, Bas van Ruijven
{"title":"Circular strategies for building sector decarbonization in China: A scenario analysis","authors":"Alessio Mastrucci,&nbsp;Fei Guo,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Zhong,&nbsp;Florian Maczek,&nbsp;Bas van Ruijven","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The building sector in China is responsible for 40% of total energy-related CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, driven by its large population, continuous economic growth, and construction boom. In addition to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from energy use, buildings drive significant emissions for construction activities and production of energy-intensive materials, such as steel and cement. While supply-side energy strategies have been extensively explored, a demand-side perspective that considers stock dynamics and circularity improvements is essential to assess sustainable pathways for the buildings sector. Here, we explore a set of decarbonization scenarios for the building sector in China considering a range of circular strategies and their interplay with different climate policies. The strategies include lifetime extension of buildings, switch to wood-based construction, reduction of per-capita floorspace, and a combination of all three strategies. We use the building sector model MESSAGEix-Buildings soft linked to the integrated assessment model (IAM) MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM and prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the effects of these circular strategies on building material and energy demands, and operational and embodied emissions. We find that the three strategies could reduce building material demand up to 60% on mass basis by 2060 compared to a reference scenario with continuation of current policies. This translates into a reduction of embodied and total GHG emissions of 62% and 24%, respectively, significantly contributing to achieving decarbonization targets. Integrating industrial ecology methods in IAMs, as demonstrated in this study, can provide valuable insights to inform national policy decisions on mitigation strategies accounting for both demand and supply sides.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.13523","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The building sector in China is responsible for 40% of total energy-related CO2 emissions, driven by its large population, continuous economic growth, and construction boom. In addition to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from energy use, buildings drive significant emissions for construction activities and production of energy-intensive materials, such as steel and cement. While supply-side energy strategies have been extensively explored, a demand-side perspective that considers stock dynamics and circularity improvements is essential to assess sustainable pathways for the buildings sector. Here, we explore a set of decarbonization scenarios for the building sector in China considering a range of circular strategies and their interplay with different climate policies. The strategies include lifetime extension of buildings, switch to wood-based construction, reduction of per-capita floorspace, and a combination of all three strategies. We use the building sector model MESSAGEix-Buildings soft linked to the integrated assessment model (IAM) MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM and prospective life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the effects of these circular strategies on building material and energy demands, and operational and embodied emissions. We find that the three strategies could reduce building material demand up to 60% on mass basis by 2060 compared to a reference scenario with continuation of current policies. This translates into a reduction of embodied and total GHG emissions of 62% and 24%, respectively, significantly contributing to achieving decarbonization targets. Integrating industrial ecology methods in IAMs, as demonstrated in this study, can provide valuable insights to inform national policy decisions on mitigation strategies accounting for both demand and supply sides.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国建筑行业去碳化的循环战略:情景分析
中国人口众多,经济持续增长,建筑业蓬勃发展,因此建筑行业的二氧化碳排放量占能源相关排放总量的 40%。除了能源使用产生的温室气体(GHG)排放外,建筑活动和高能耗材料(如钢材和水泥)的生产也产生了大量排放。虽然供应方的能源战略已被广泛探讨,但考虑存量动态和循环性改善的需求方视角对于评估建筑行业的可持续发展道路至关重要。在此,我们探讨了中国建筑行业的一系列脱碳方案,考虑了一系列循环战略及其与不同气候政策的相互作用。这些策略包括延长建筑物的使用寿命、改用木结构建筑、减少人均建筑面积以及三种策略的组合。我们使用与综合评估模型(IAM)MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM 和前瞻性生命周期评估(LCA)相连接的建筑部门模型 MESSAGEix-Buildings soft,来评估这些循环战略对建筑材料和能源需求以及运行和体现排放的影响。我们发现,与延续现行政策的参考情景相比,到 2060 年,这三种战略可将建筑材料需求量减少 60%。这意味着体现的温室气体排放量和总排放量分别减少了 62% 和 24%,大大有助于实现去碳化目标。如本研究所示,将工业生态学方法整合到综合管理模型中,可为国家政策决策提供宝贵的见解,从而为考虑供需双方的减排战略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information, Cover, and Table of Contents Prospective life cycle assessment of climate and biodiversity impacts of meat‐based and plant‐forward meals: A case study of Indonesian and German meal options Unpacking the path toward a sustainable circular economy through industrial ecology An integrated urban metabolism and ecosystem service assessment: The case study of Lima, Peru Additive inclusion in plastic life cycle assessments part I: Review of mechanical recycling studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1