Surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal approach as a modality of management for large and giant pituitary adenomas: a retrospective case series

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Egyptian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1186/s41984-024-00311-7
Shebl Izz-alarab, Michael Zohney, Saied A. Issa, Abdelaleem Abdelwahab, Ashraf G. Al-Abyad, Mohamed M. Aziz
{"title":"Surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal approach as a modality of management for large and giant pituitary adenomas: a retrospective case series","authors":"Shebl Izz-alarab, Michael Zohney, Saied A. Issa, Abdelaleem Abdelwahab, Ashraf G. Al-Abyad, Mohamed M. Aziz","doi":"10.1186/s41984-024-00311-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large and giant pituitary adenomas (defined as tumors of maximal diameter ≥ 3–3.9 cm and ≥ 4 cm, respectively) present considerable surgical challenges regarding the extent of resection and perioperative morbidity. Endoscopic endonasal resection is considered the most effective treatment for pituitary adenomas. It allows for better visualization, maneuverability, and access to distant and lateral tumor compartments, ultimately enhancing the extent of resection. This article evaluates our initial experience with endoscopic endonasal resection of large and giant pituitary adenomas. The clinical outcomes, perioperative complications, and extent of tumor resection would be specifically addressed. The primary goal of surgery was to decompress the optic pathways, and the secondary goals were to achieve maximal safe resection and hormonal control in hormone-secreting adenomas. The degree of tumor resection was classified as gross-total resection (100%), near-total resection (90–100%), subtotal resection (70–90%), and partial resection (< 70%). 42 patients were included in this study. A good visual outcome achieved with 80% improvement in visual symptoms. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 19 patients (45.2%), near-total resection (NTR) was achieved in 12 patients (28.6%), subtotal resection (STR) in 6 patients (14.3%), and partial resection in the remaining 5 patients (11.9%). Subgroup analysis revealed that GTR, NTR rates were higher in large, compared to giant tumors. GTR, NTR rates of large adenomas were 59.3%, and 29.6%, compared to 20%, and 26.7% in giant adenomas respectively (p-value: 0.01428). Surgical complications were observed in 19 patients (45.2%) with CSF leakage being the most common complication (11 patients, 26.2%). Post-operative diabetes insipidus was observed in 5 patients (11.9%), major vascular injury in one case (2.4%), transient post-op 6th nerve palsy observed in 3 patients (7.1%), while two patients (4.8%) presented with post-operative paranasal sinuses infection. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of large and giant pituitary adenomas is a safe and efficient procedure. Large adenomas (3–3.9 cm) have excellent resection rates and lower complications than giant adenomas (≥ 4 cm), which may require extending our approach to achieve more tumor resection rates in the future. However, only adequate resection of these giant adenomas can be enough to achieve the main surgical goals of visual improvement, hormonal control, and decompression of surrounding structures.","PeriodicalId":72881,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-024-00311-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large and giant pituitary adenomas (defined as tumors of maximal diameter ≥ 3–3.9 cm and ≥ 4 cm, respectively) present considerable surgical challenges regarding the extent of resection and perioperative morbidity. Endoscopic endonasal resection is considered the most effective treatment for pituitary adenomas. It allows for better visualization, maneuverability, and access to distant and lateral tumor compartments, ultimately enhancing the extent of resection. This article evaluates our initial experience with endoscopic endonasal resection of large and giant pituitary adenomas. The clinical outcomes, perioperative complications, and extent of tumor resection would be specifically addressed. The primary goal of surgery was to decompress the optic pathways, and the secondary goals were to achieve maximal safe resection and hormonal control in hormone-secreting adenomas. The degree of tumor resection was classified as gross-total resection (100%), near-total resection (90–100%), subtotal resection (70–90%), and partial resection (< 70%). 42 patients were included in this study. A good visual outcome achieved with 80% improvement in visual symptoms. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 19 patients (45.2%), near-total resection (NTR) was achieved in 12 patients (28.6%), subtotal resection (STR) in 6 patients (14.3%), and partial resection in the remaining 5 patients (11.9%). Subgroup analysis revealed that GTR, NTR rates were higher in large, compared to giant tumors. GTR, NTR rates of large adenomas were 59.3%, and 29.6%, compared to 20%, and 26.7% in giant adenomas respectively (p-value: 0.01428). Surgical complications were observed in 19 patients (45.2%) with CSF leakage being the most common complication (11 patients, 26.2%). Post-operative diabetes insipidus was observed in 5 patients (11.9%), major vascular injury in one case (2.4%), transient post-op 6th nerve palsy observed in 3 patients (7.1%), while two patients (4.8%) presented with post-operative paranasal sinuses infection. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of large and giant pituitary adenomas is a safe and efficient procedure. Large adenomas (3–3.9 cm) have excellent resection rates and lower complications than giant adenomas (≥ 4 cm), which may require extending our approach to achieve more tumor resection rates in the future. However, only adequate resection of these giant adenomas can be enough to achieve the main surgical goals of visual improvement, hormonal control, and decompression of surrounding structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以内窥镜鼻内入路治疗巨大垂体腺瘤的手术效果:回顾性病例系列研究
大垂体腺瘤和巨大垂体腺瘤(分别定义为最大直径≥ 3-3.9 厘米和≥ 4 厘米的肿瘤)在切除范围和围手术期发病率方面给手术带来了相当大的挑战。内镜下腔内切除术被认为是治疗垂体腺瘤最有效的方法。它能更好地观察、操作和进入远侧和侧方肿瘤区,最终提高切除范围。本文评估了我们对巨大垂体腺瘤进行内镜下切除的初步经验。文章将具体讨论临床结果、围手术期并发症和肿瘤切除范围。手术的首要目标是减压视神经通路,次要目标是实现最大程度的安全切除和对分泌激素腺瘤的激素控制。肿瘤切除程度分为全切(100%)、近全切(90%-100%)、次全切(70%-90%)和部分切除(<70%)。本研究共纳入 42 名患者。视觉效果良好,视觉症状改善率达 80%。19名患者(45.2%)实现了大部切除(GTR),12名患者(28.6%)实现了近全切(NTR),6名患者(14.3%)实现了次全切(STR),其余5名患者(11.9%)实现了部分切除。亚组分析显示,与巨大肿瘤相比,巨大肿瘤的 GTR 和 NTR 率更高。大腺瘤的GTR和NTR率分别为59.3%和29.6%,而巨大腺瘤的GTR和NTR率分别为20%和26.7%(P值:0.01428)。19名患者(45.2%)出现了手术并发症,其中最常见的并发症是脑脊液渗漏(11名患者,26.2%)。5名患者(11.9%)出现术后糖尿病,1名患者(2.4%)出现大血管损伤,3名患者(7.1%)术后出现一过性第六神经麻痹,2名患者(4.8%)出现术后副鼻窦感染。内镜下经鼻窦切除巨大垂体腺瘤是一种安全有效的手术。与巨大腺瘤(≥ 4 厘米)相比,大腺瘤(3-3.9 厘米)的切除率极高,并发症较少,因此今后可能需要扩展我们的方法,以实现更高的肿瘤切除率。然而,只有充分切除这些巨大腺瘤,才能实现改善视力、控制激素分泌和为周围结构减压的主要手术目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary team approach in management of anterior spinal dysraphism with unusual presentation: case series and surgical approach Analysis of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury associated with skull base fracture: a local tertiary center experience Conventional and old endovascular techniques for vertebral aneurysms still work in the era of flow diversion Possible effects of lumbar stabilization surgery on sagittal alignment, disability and quality of life Role of intraoperative cranial ultrasonography in detection of residual brain lesions during surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1