IFRS-9, expected loan loss provisioning and bank liquidity creation: early evidence

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Research Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1108/arj-03-2024-0086
Saibal Ghosh
{"title":"IFRS-9, expected loan loss provisioning and bank liquidity creation: early evidence","authors":"Saibal Ghosh","doi":"10.1108/arj-03-2024-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The relevance of both microeconomic and macroeconomic factors in driving banks’ liquidity creation within a cross-country setup has been addressed in prior research. The purpose of this study is to explore whether and how the recent International Financial Reporting Standards-9 (IFRS-9) accounting standards affect this relationship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The author exploits the staggered implementation of IFRS-9 across countries and use a difference-in-differences framework to tease out the causal impact.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings indicate that the enactment of IFRS-9 leads to an increase in asset-side liquidity creation and a decline of broadly similar magnitude in liability-side liquidity creation. As a result, total liquidity creation remains unaltered. Disaggregatedly, the evidence shows that all the key channels on the asset and liability side are instrumental in explaining this behaviour.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The author views this as one of the early studies in a cross-country setup to explore the interlinkage between IFRS-9 and bank liquidity creation. Since liquidity creation measure provides a comprehensive metric of liquidity supplied by banks to the market, the study seeks to inform the policy debate on the role of these recently instituted accounting standards on bank liquidity behaviour.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-03-2024-0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The relevance of both microeconomic and macroeconomic factors in driving banks’ liquidity creation within a cross-country setup has been addressed in prior research. The purpose of this study is to explore whether and how the recent International Financial Reporting Standards-9 (IFRS-9) accounting standards affect this relationship.

Design/methodology/approach

The author exploits the staggered implementation of IFRS-9 across countries and use a difference-in-differences framework to tease out the causal impact.

Findings

The findings indicate that the enactment of IFRS-9 leads to an increase in asset-side liquidity creation and a decline of broadly similar magnitude in liability-side liquidity creation. As a result, total liquidity creation remains unaltered. Disaggregatedly, the evidence shows that all the key channels on the asset and liability side are instrumental in explaining this behaviour.

Originality/value

The author views this as one of the early studies in a cross-country setup to explore the interlinkage between IFRS-9 and bank liquidity creation. Since liquidity creation measure provides a comprehensive metric of liquidity supplied by banks to the market, the study seeks to inform the policy debate on the role of these recently instituted accounting standards on bank liquidity behaviour.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IFRS-9、预期贷款损失准备金和银行流动性创造:早期证据
目的以往的研究已经探讨了微观经济和宏观经济因素在跨国环境下推动银行创造流动性的相关性。研究结果研究结果表明,《国际财务报告准则第 9 号》(IFRS-9)的颁布导致资产方流动性创造增加,而负债方流动性创造的下降幅度大致相同。因此,流动性创造总量保持不变。从分类来看,证据显示资产和负债端的所有关键渠道都有助于解释这种行为。 作者认为这是跨国背景下探讨《国际财务报告准则第 9 号》与银行流动性创造之间相互联系的早期研究之一。由于流动性创造的衡量标准提供了银行向市场供应流动性的综合指标,因此本研究旨在为有关这些新近制定的会计准则对银行流动性行为的作用的政策辩论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The role of other comprehensive income in analyst valuation: profitability, perception and performance Does aural accounting improve the stakeholder relationship capability? Factors influencing readiness to implement digital audit among internal auditors of the Malaysian public sector Does a CEO from a reputable university create a better working environment? Evidence from Indonesia Determinants and impact of production planning and control accounting techniques on competitiveness of manufacturing companies: a structural equation modelling approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1