Gustavo Kirsch, Amanda Gomes Anjos, Renata Ruaro, Nelson Abrantes, Bruno R. S. Figueiredo
{"title":"Ashes in Freshwater Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of their Impacts on Fish","authors":"Gustavo Kirsch, Amanda Gomes Anjos, Renata Ruaro, Nelson Abrantes, Bruno R. S. Figueiredo","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07308-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ash runoff into freshwater systems from fire events, coal combustion, and volcanic activities threatens to biodiversity conservation, given its toxicity to various aquatic organisms. However, despite many studies reporting a negative relationship between ash exposure and the biological traits of freshwater fish, non-significant and even positive associations can also be found in the literature. Here, a systematized review was conducted to explore patterns and biases in studies examining the impacts of ash on freshwater fish. Out of the 43 studies included in this review, 38 reported harmful effects of ash exposure on fish traits. The median lowest concentration of ashes capable of inducing negative effects on fish traits was found to be 2 g/L. Diet restrictions (84.6%), behavioral changes (83.3%), cytological and genetic damages (64.7%), and bioaccumulation of toxic compounds (57.1%) exhibited the highest proportions of negative results in statistical evaluations testing ash effects on fish traits. In contrast, biomarkers related to reproduction (94.7%) and metabolism (66.4%) had the highest proportion of non-significant associations between fish traits and ash exposure. Statistical models indicate that the ash source does not determine the direction (positive or negative) of its effect on fish traits. Furthermore, no evidence supports the hypothesis of similar sensitivity levels to ash exposure among phylogenetically closely related fish species. Together, the evidence provides a cohesive perspective on the detrimental effects of ash on fish, highlighting the effective necessity to manage the influx of ash into watercourses.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"235 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07308-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ash runoff into freshwater systems from fire events, coal combustion, and volcanic activities threatens to biodiversity conservation, given its toxicity to various aquatic organisms. However, despite many studies reporting a negative relationship between ash exposure and the biological traits of freshwater fish, non-significant and even positive associations can also be found in the literature. Here, a systematized review was conducted to explore patterns and biases in studies examining the impacts of ash on freshwater fish. Out of the 43 studies included in this review, 38 reported harmful effects of ash exposure on fish traits. The median lowest concentration of ashes capable of inducing negative effects on fish traits was found to be 2 g/L. Diet restrictions (84.6%), behavioral changes (83.3%), cytological and genetic damages (64.7%), and bioaccumulation of toxic compounds (57.1%) exhibited the highest proportions of negative results in statistical evaluations testing ash effects on fish traits. In contrast, biomarkers related to reproduction (94.7%) and metabolism (66.4%) had the highest proportion of non-significant associations between fish traits and ash exposure. Statistical models indicate that the ash source does not determine the direction (positive or negative) of its effect on fish traits. Furthermore, no evidence supports the hypothesis of similar sensitivity levels to ash exposure among phylogenetically closely related fish species. Together, the evidence provides a cohesive perspective on the detrimental effects of ash on fish, highlighting the effective necessity to manage the influx of ash into watercourses.
期刊介绍:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments.
Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation.
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.