Out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure amongst community-dwelling adults: findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) in 2016

James Larkin, Ciaran Prendergast, Logan T. Murry, Michelle Flood, Barbara Clyne, Sara Burke, Conor Keegan, Fiona Boland, Tom Fahey, Nav Persaud, Rose Anne Kenny, Frank Moriarty
{"title":"Out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure amongst community-dwelling adults: findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) in 2016","authors":"James Larkin, Ciaran Prendergast, Logan T. Murry, Michelle Flood, Barbara Clyne, Sara Burke, Conor Keegan, Fiona Boland, Tom Fahey, Nav Persaud, Rose Anne Kenny, Frank Moriarty","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.11.24310220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nThe number of prescription medicines prescribed to older adults is increasing in Ireland and other countries. This is leading to higher out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure for older adults, which has several negative consequences including cost-related non-adherence. This study aimed to characterise out-of-pocket prescription medicine payments, and examine their relationship with entitlements, multimorbidity and adherence.\nMethods\nThis cross-sectional study used 2016 data from a nationally-representative sample of adults in Ireland aged 50 years or less. Descriptive statistics and regression models were used to describe out-of-pocket prescription medicine payments and assess the association between out-of-pocket prescription medicine payments and the following variables: healthcare entitlements, multimorbidity, and cost-related non-adherence.\nResults\nThere were 5,668 eligible participants. Median annual out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure was 144 euro (IQR: 0-312 euro). A generalised linear model showed that, amongst those with out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure, having fewer healthcare entitlements was associated with 4.74 (95% CI: 4.37-5.15) times higher out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure. Overall, 1.7% (n=89) of participants reported cost-related non-adherence in the previous year. A multivariable model found no significant associations between any variables and cost-related non-adherence. Conclusions\nThose with entitlements to subsidised prescription medicines had much lower out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure. This highlights the benefits of expanding healthcare entitlements and ensuring uptake of entitlements by those with eligibility.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.24310220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The number of prescription medicines prescribed to older adults is increasing in Ireland and other countries. This is leading to higher out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure for older adults, which has several negative consequences including cost-related non-adherence. This study aimed to characterise out-of-pocket prescription medicine payments, and examine their relationship with entitlements, multimorbidity and adherence. Methods This cross-sectional study used 2016 data from a nationally-representative sample of adults in Ireland aged 50 years or less. Descriptive statistics and regression models were used to describe out-of-pocket prescription medicine payments and assess the association between out-of-pocket prescription medicine payments and the following variables: healthcare entitlements, multimorbidity, and cost-related non-adherence. Results There were 5,668 eligible participants. Median annual out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure was 144 euro (IQR: 0-312 euro). A generalised linear model showed that, amongst those with out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure, having fewer healthcare entitlements was associated with 4.74 (95% CI: 4.37-5.15) times higher out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure. Overall, 1.7% (n=89) of participants reported cost-related non-adherence in the previous year. A multivariable model found no significant associations between any variables and cost-related non-adherence. Conclusions Those with entitlements to subsidised prescription medicines had much lower out-of-pocket prescription medicine expenditure. This highlights the benefits of expanding healthcare entitlements and ensuring uptake of entitlements by those with eligibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区居住成年人的自付处方药支出:2016 年爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)的结果
背景在爱尔兰和其他国家,为老年人开具的处方药数量不断增加。这导致了老年人自付处方药费用的增加,并产生了一些负面影响,包括与费用相关的不依从性。本研究旨在描述自付处方药费用的特点,并考察其与应享权利、多病症和依从性之间的关系。方法本横断面研究使用了 2016 年爱尔兰具有全国代表性的 50 岁或以下成年人样本数据。研究采用描述性统计和回归模型来描述自付处方药费用,并评估自付处方药费用与以下变量之间的关联:医疗保健权利、多病症和与费用相关的不依从性。每年自付处方药费用的中位数为 144 欧元(IQR:0-312 欧元)。广义线性模型显示,在自付处方药费用的人群中,医疗保健权利越少,自付处方药费用越高,相关系数为 4.74 (95% CI: 4.37-5.15) 倍。总体而言,1.7%(n=89)的参与者报告了上一年与费用相关的不坚持治疗行为。多变量模型发现,任何变量与费用相关不依从症之间均无明显关联。结论享受处方药补贴的人自付处方药费用要低得多。这凸显了扩大医疗保健权利和确保有资格者享受权利的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1