Clinical reasoning in real-world practice: a primer for medical trainees and practitioners.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1093/postmj/qgae079
Isaac K S Ng, Wilson G W Goh, Desmond B Teo, Kar Mun Chong, Li Feng Tan, Chia Meng Teoh
{"title":"Clinical reasoning in real-world practice: a primer for medical trainees and practitioners.","authors":"Isaac K S Ng, Wilson G W Goh, Desmond B Teo, Kar Mun Chong, Li Feng Tan, Chia Meng Teoh","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical reasoning is a crucial skill and defining characteristic of the medical profession, which relates to intricate cognitive and decision-making processes that are needed to solve real-world clinical problems. However, much of our current competency-based medical education systems have focused on imparting swathes of content knowledge and skills to our medical trainees, without an adequate emphasis on strengthening the cognitive schema and psychological processes that govern actual decision-making in clinical environments. Nonetheless, flawed clinical reasoning has serious repercussions on patient care, as it is associated with diagnostic errors, inappropriate investigations, and incongruent or suboptimal management plans that can result in significant morbidity and even mortality. In this article, we discuss the psychological constructs of clinical reasoning in the form of cognitive 'thought processing' models and real-world contextual or emotional influences on clinical decision-making. In addition, we propose practical strategies, including pedagogical development of a personal cognitive schema, mitigating strategies to combat cognitive bias and flawed reasoning, and emotional regulation and self-care techniques, which can be adopted in medical training to optimize physicians' clinical reasoning in real-world practice that effectively translates learnt knowledge and skill sets into good decisions and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical reasoning is a crucial skill and defining characteristic of the medical profession, which relates to intricate cognitive and decision-making processes that are needed to solve real-world clinical problems. However, much of our current competency-based medical education systems have focused on imparting swathes of content knowledge and skills to our medical trainees, without an adequate emphasis on strengthening the cognitive schema and psychological processes that govern actual decision-making in clinical environments. Nonetheless, flawed clinical reasoning has serious repercussions on patient care, as it is associated with diagnostic errors, inappropriate investigations, and incongruent or suboptimal management plans that can result in significant morbidity and even mortality. In this article, we discuss the psychological constructs of clinical reasoning in the form of cognitive 'thought processing' models and real-world contextual or emotional influences on clinical decision-making. In addition, we propose practical strategies, including pedagogical development of a personal cognitive schema, mitigating strategies to combat cognitive bias and flawed reasoning, and emotional regulation and self-care techniques, which can be adopted in medical training to optimize physicians' clinical reasoning in real-world practice that effectively translates learnt knowledge and skill sets into good decisions and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实世界实践中的临床推理:医学学员和从业人员入门指南》。
临床推理是医学专业的一项重要技能和决定性特征,它与解决实际临床问题所需的复杂认知和决策过程有关。然而,我们目前的能力本位医学教育体系大多侧重于向医学学员传授大量的内容知识和技能,而没有充分强调加强临床环境中实际决策所需的认知模式和心理过程。然而,有缺陷的临床推理会对患者护理产生严重影响,因为它与诊断错误、不恰当的检查、不协调或不理想的管理计划有关,可能导致严重的发病率甚至死亡率。在本文中,我们将以认知 "思维加工 "模型的形式讨论临床推理的心理结构,以及临床决策中的现实环境或情感影响。此外,我们还提出了切实可行的策略,包括个人认知模式的教学发展、消除认知偏差和错误推理的缓解策略以及情绪调节和自我护理技巧,这些策略可在医学培训中采用,以优化医生在现实世界实践中的临床推理,从而有效地将所学知识和技能转化为良好的决策和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian analysis of the causality between inflammatory cytokines and digestive tract cancers. Cholecystectomy and cancer risk: evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Mendelian randomization. The key to addressing the issue of academic misconduct in the medical field is to reform the evaluation system. Timeliness of reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and outcomes in Kerala, India: results of the TRUST outcomes registry. Variation of brain natriuretic peptide assists with volume management and predicts prognosis of hemodialysis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1