Étude RIESC : risques d’infections uro-génitales et d’expulsion dans l’association stérilet et coupe menstruelle

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2024.07.003
Johanna Madar , Méghane Gaucher , Adriaan Barbaroux , Jérôme Delotte , Carol-Anne Boudy
{"title":"Étude RIESC : risques d’infections uro-génitales et d’expulsion dans l’association stérilet et coupe menstruelle","authors":"Johanna Madar ,&nbsp;Méghane Gaucher ,&nbsp;Adriaan Barbaroux ,&nbsp;Jérôme Delotte ,&nbsp;Carol-Anne Boudy","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The increase in intrauterine devices (IUDs) contraception, and the growing use of reusables menstrual hygiene products such as the menstrual cup, necessitates an assessment of the implications of their co-use. The objectives are to assess whether women with IUDs who use menstrual cups have an increased risk of IUD expulsion and/or a change in the risk of upper and lower urogenital tract infections compared to women who use other menstrual hygiene products.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted in France between 2020 and 2023. Participants were recruited by health professionals and data were collected by telephone questionnaire at the time of IUD insertion and at one year. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of IUD expulsion and the occurrence of urogenital tract infections in menstrual cup users compared to non-users.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred and three women out of 119 included were analyzed, 25 of them were regular menstrual cup users and five experienced IUD expulsion. Among regular users, 12% experienced IUD expulsion compared to 2.6% among non-users, with no statistically significant difference (Chi<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3.65; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.056). Regarding urogenital tract infections, nine women (36%) of the regular menstrual cup users had urogenital infections, compared with 27 (34.6%) of the non-users or not regular users, with no statistically significant difference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The tendency of menstrual cup users to expel their IUDs is a reason for caution, although it is not sufficient to contraindicate co-use. Physicians should therefore systematically screen such co-use and inform patients of the risks and monitoring instructions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468718924002599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The increase in intrauterine devices (IUDs) contraception, and the growing use of reusables menstrual hygiene products such as the menstrual cup, necessitates an assessment of the implications of their co-use. The objectives are to assess whether women with IUDs who use menstrual cups have an increased risk of IUD expulsion and/or a change in the risk of upper and lower urogenital tract infections compared to women who use other menstrual hygiene products.

Method

An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted in France between 2020 and 2023. Participants were recruited by health professionals and data were collected by telephone questionnaire at the time of IUD insertion and at one year. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of IUD expulsion and the occurrence of urogenital tract infections in menstrual cup users compared to non-users.

Results

One hundred and three women out of 119 included were analyzed, 25 of them were regular menstrual cup users and five experienced IUD expulsion. Among regular users, 12% experienced IUD expulsion compared to 2.6% among non-users, with no statistically significant difference (Chi2 = 3.65; P = 0.056). Regarding urogenital tract infections, nine women (36%) of the regular menstrual cup users had urogenital infections, compared with 27 (34.6%) of the non-users or not regular users, with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion

The tendency of menstrual cup users to expel their IUDs is a reason for caution, although it is not sufficient to contraindicate co-use. Physicians should therefore systematically screen such co-use and inform patients of the risks and monitoring instructions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[宫内节育器与月经杯结合使用时的泌尿系统感染和排出风险]。
目的:随着宫内节育器(IUDs)避孕的增加,以及月经杯等可重复使用的月经卫生用品的使用日益增多,有必要对其共同使用的影响进行评估。目的是评估与使用其他月经卫生用品的妇女相比,使用月经杯的宫内节育器妇女是否会增加宫内节育器脱出的风险和/或改变上下泌尿生殖道感染的风险:一项观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究于 2020 年至 2023 年在法国进行。参与者由专业医护人员招募,在放置宫内节育器时和一年后通过电话问卷收集数据。主要终点是与未使用月经杯者相比,使用月经杯者的宫内节育器脱出发生率和泌尿生殖道感染发生率:对 119 名妇女进行了分析,其中 25 人经常使用月经杯,5 人发生过宫内节育器脱出。在经常使用月经杯的妇女中,12%的人出现过宫内节育器脱出的情况,而在未使用月经杯的妇女中,这一比例仅为 2.6%,两者在统计学上无显著差异(Chi2 = 3.65;P = .056)。在泌尿生殖道感染方面,月经杯的定期使用者中有 9 名妇女(36%)发生过泌尿生殖道感染,而非使用者或非定期使用者中有 27 名妇女(34.6%)发生过泌尿生殖道感染,两者在统计学上无显著差异:结论:月经杯使用者容易将宫内节育器排出体外,这一点值得警惕,但这并不足以成为共同使用的禁忌。因此,医生应系统地筛查此类共同使用情况,并告知患者其风险和监测说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie
Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie est un mensuel scientifique d''information et de formation destiné aux gynécologues, aux obstétriciens, aux sénologues et aux biologistes de la reproduction. La revue, dans ses éditoriaux, articles originaux, mises au point, lettres à la rédaction et autres rubriques, donne une information actualisée ayant trait à l''obstétrique et à la gynécologie et aux différentes spécialités développées à partir de ces deux pôles : médecine de la reproduction, médecine maternelle et fœtale, périnatalité, endocrinologie, chirurgie gynécologique, cancérologie pelvienne, sénologie, sexualité, psychosomatique…
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Sommaire [Blood and tears. To stop the cycle of conflict-related sexual violence]. [Impact of HypnoVR© with local anesthesia on pain and anxiety during oocyte pick-up]. [Study of the profile and trajectory of women seeking a maternal medical termination of pregnancy for psychosocial reasons at the University Hospital of Tours from 2017 to 2021.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1