Sarah E. King MD, Marcus D. Ruopp MD, Chi T. Mac PharmD, Kelly A. O'Malley PhD, Jordana L. Meyerson MD, MSc, Lindsay Lefers PT, DPT, Jonathan F. Bean MD, MPH, Jane A. Driver MD, MPH, Andrea Wershof Schwartz MD, MPH, AGSF
{"title":"Early clinical and quality impacts of the Age-Friendly Health System in a Veterans Affairs skilled nursing facility","authors":"Sarah E. King MD, Marcus D. Ruopp MD, Chi T. Mac PharmD, Kelly A. O'Malley PhD, Jordana L. Meyerson MD, MSc, Lindsay Lefers PT, DPT, Jonathan F. Bean MD, MPH, Jane A. Driver MD, MPH, Andrea Wershof Schwartz MD, MPH, AGSF","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are an ideal setting to implement the Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) approach, an initiative by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) centered on the 4Ms: what matters, mobility, mentation, and medication. AFHS implementation has not been well studied in SNFs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 112-bed VA SNF implemented a facility-wide AFHS initiative including the following: (1) participating in a national IHI Age-Friendly Action Community; (2) establishing an AFHS workgroup centered on the 4Ms; (3) identifying meaningful clinical tools and frameworks for capturing each M; and (4) developing sustainment methods. Clinical (life-sustaining treatment, falls, disruptive behaviors, and medication deprescribing) and quality outcomes (rehospitalization, emergency department utilization, and discharge to the community) in addition to patient satisfaction were compared pre- and post-AFHS implementation (bed days of care [BDOC] 17413) to post-implementation (BDOC 20880).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical outcomes demonstrated improvements in the 4Ms, including: (1) what matters: 14% increase in life-sustaining treatment documentation (82%–96%; <i>p</i> < 0.01); (2) mobility: reduction in fall rate by 34% (8.15 falls/1000 BDOC to 5.41; <i>p</i> < 0.01); (3) mentation: decrease in disruptive behavior reporting system (DBRS) by 62% (5.11 DBRS/1000 BDOC to 1.96; <i>p</i> = 0.04); (4) medications: 53% increase in average potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) deprescribing (0.38–0.80 interventions/patient; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Quality outcomes improved including rehospitalization (25.6%–17.9%) and emergency department utilization (5.3%–2.8%) within 30 days of admission. Patient satisfaction scores improved from a mean of 77.2 (<i>n</i> = 31, scale 1–100) to 81.3 (<i>n</i> = 42).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation of the AFHS initiative in a SNF was associated with improved clinical and quality outcomes and patient satisfaction. We describe here a sustainable, interprofessional approach to implementing the AFHS in a SNF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 12","pages":"3865-3874"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://agsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are an ideal setting to implement the Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) approach, an initiative by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) centered on the 4Ms: what matters, mobility, mentation, and medication. AFHS implementation has not been well studied in SNFs.
Methods
A 112-bed VA SNF implemented a facility-wide AFHS initiative including the following: (1) participating in a national IHI Age-Friendly Action Community; (2) establishing an AFHS workgroup centered on the 4Ms; (3) identifying meaningful clinical tools and frameworks for capturing each M; and (4) developing sustainment methods. Clinical (life-sustaining treatment, falls, disruptive behaviors, and medication deprescribing) and quality outcomes (rehospitalization, emergency department utilization, and discharge to the community) in addition to patient satisfaction were compared pre- and post-AFHS implementation (bed days of care [BDOC] 17413) to post-implementation (BDOC 20880).
Results
Clinical outcomes demonstrated improvements in the 4Ms, including: (1) what matters: 14% increase in life-sustaining treatment documentation (82%–96%; p < 0.01); (2) mobility: reduction in fall rate by 34% (8.15 falls/1000 BDOC to 5.41; p < 0.01); (3) mentation: decrease in disruptive behavior reporting system (DBRS) by 62% (5.11 DBRS/1000 BDOC to 1.96; p = 0.04); (4) medications: 53% increase in average potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) deprescribing (0.38–0.80 interventions/patient; p < 0.01). Quality outcomes improved including rehospitalization (25.6%–17.9%) and emergency department utilization (5.3%–2.8%) within 30 days of admission. Patient satisfaction scores improved from a mean of 77.2 (n = 31, scale 1–100) to 81.3 (n = 42).
Conclusions
Implementation of the AFHS initiative in a SNF was associated with improved clinical and quality outcomes and patient satisfaction. We describe here a sustainable, interprofessional approach to implementing the AFHS in a SNF.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.