Taxation and Incentives in Private Health Services Delivery in Nigeria: Opinion of Private Health Practitioners.

Rex Friday Ogoronte A Ijah, Okechukwu Ibeabuchi, ChinemereJ Onyema, Somiari L Harcourt, Ajibola Alabi, Friday E Aaron
{"title":"Taxation and Incentives in Private Health Services Delivery in Nigeria: Opinion of Private Health Practitioners.","authors":"Rex Friday Ogoronte A Ijah, Okechukwu Ibeabuchi, ChinemereJ Onyema, Somiari L Harcourt, Ajibola Alabi, Friday E Aaron","doi":"10.60787/nmj-v65i1-457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tax relief and incentives are utilized to encourage the private health sector to provide services that are advantageous to community health. The aim of this study was to explore the issues related to taxes paid, incentives provided, returns on investment, satisfaction with practice, and plans of private health practitioners who were conference attendees in Port Harcourt in 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at two national events in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria in October, and December 2021, among conference attendees using self-administered questionnaires. Data obtained was analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 and presented in tables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of one hundred and sixty-six (166) respondents were involved in the study. One hundred and four (62.7%) respondents believed they experienced multiple taxation from agencies of government. Most respondents paid at least fifty thousand and above as taxes to various levels of government. One hundred and forty-two (85.5%) respondents believed they did not receive any incentive from governments for their private health businesses. Fifty-three (31.9%) were not satisfied, while55 (33.1%) respondents were managing to survive in the business environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Private healthcare practitioners in Nigeria experience multiple taxation and a lack of incentives from governments. Dissatisfaction with the return on investment is prevalent. Inclusive health sector reform that will partly reduce the potential for brain drain is therefore needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60787/nmj-v65i1-457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tax relief and incentives are utilized to encourage the private health sector to provide services that are advantageous to community health. The aim of this study was to explore the issues related to taxes paid, incentives provided, returns on investment, satisfaction with practice, and plans of private health practitioners who were conference attendees in Port Harcourt in 2021.

Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out at two national events in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria in October, and December 2021, among conference attendees using self-administered questionnaires. Data obtained was analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 and presented in tables.

Results: A total of one hundred and sixty-six (166) respondents were involved in the study. One hundred and four (62.7%) respondents believed they experienced multiple taxation from agencies of government. Most respondents paid at least fifty thousand and above as taxes to various levels of government. One hundred and forty-two (85.5%) respondents believed they did not receive any incentive from governments for their private health businesses. Fifty-three (31.9%) were not satisfied, while55 (33.1%) respondents were managing to survive in the business environment.

Conclusion: Private healthcare practitioners in Nigeria experience multiple taxation and a lack of incentives from governments. Dissatisfaction with the return on investment is prevalent. Inclusive health sector reform that will partly reduce the potential for brain drain is therefore needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚私人医疗服务中的税收与激励机制:私人医疗从业者的意见。
背景:减税和奖励措施被用来鼓励私营医疗部门提供有利于社区健康的服务。本研究旨在探讨 2021 年在哈科特港参加会议的私营医疗从业人员在纳税、激励措施、投资回报、执业满意度和计划等方面的相关问题:在 2021 年 10 月和 12 月于尼日利亚河流州哈科特港举行的两次全国性活动中,使用自填式问卷对参会者进行了描述性横截面研究。所获数据使用 IBM 社会科学统计软件包 (SPSS) 20.0 版进行分析,并以表格形式呈现:共有 166 名受访者参与了研究。144(62.7%)名受访者认为他们遭遇了政府机构的多重征税。大多数受访者至少向各级政府缴纳了五万及以上的税款。142(85.5%)名受访者认为他们的私营保健企业没有得到政府的任何奖励。53 名受访者(31.9%)表示不满意,55 名受访者(33.1%)表示能够在商业环境中生存:结论:尼日利亚的私营医疗从业者经历了多重征税,缺乏来自政府的激励措施。对投资回报的不满十分普遍。因此,需要进行包容性的卫生部门改革,以在一定程度上减少人才流失的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of knowledge about discriminatory practices towards HIV positive individuals with the uptake of HIV testing during pregnancy among reproductive-aged women in Nigeria. Kaiso Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital in Ghana. Level of knowledge and perceived challenges associated with learning movement disorders topics: a critical review of final-year medical students at a Nigerian private university. Neonatal Transport Network Services: Preparedness of healthcare systems in Southern Nigeria. Outcome of retained intra-abdominal foreign body managed in a general surgical service in Ibadan: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1