When Perfect Is the Enemy of Good: Results of a RAND Appropriateness Panel on Treat to Target in Asymptomatic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY American Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002964
Hannah K Systrom, Victoria Rai, Siddharth Singh, Leonard Baidoo, Adam S Cheifetz, Shane M Devlin, Krisztina B Gecse, Peter M Irving, Gilaad G Kaplan, Patricia L Kozuch, Thomas Ullman, Miles P Sparrow, Gil Y Melmed, Corey A Siegel
{"title":"When Perfect Is the Enemy of Good: Results of a RAND Appropriateness Panel on Treat to Target in Asymptomatic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Hannah K Systrom, Victoria Rai, Siddharth Singh, Leonard Baidoo, Adam S Cheifetz, Shane M Devlin, Krisztina B Gecse, Peter M Irving, Gilaad G Kaplan, Patricia L Kozuch, Thomas Ullman, Miles P Sparrow, Gil Y Melmed, Corey A Siegel","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000002964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A treat-to-target strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) recommends iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical and endoscopic remission. In asymptomatic patients with ongoing endoscopic activity, the risk/benefit balance of this approach is unclear, particularly with prior exposure to advanced therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, 9 IBD specialists rated appropriateness of changing therapy in 126 scenarios of asymptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and active endoscopic disease. Disease extent and behavior, prior treatment, prior complications, and recent disease progression were considered, as were factors that might influence decision-making, including age and pregnancy. Ratings were collected through anonymous survey, discussed at an in-person meeting, and finalized in a second anonymous survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Panelists rated change in therapy as appropriate (i.e., expected benefit sufficiently outweighs potential harms from continuing therapy) in 96/126 scenarios, generally in patients with progressive, complicated, and/or extensive disease, while changing therapy was rated uncertain in 27 scenarios of mild and/or stable disease. Changing therapy was rated inappropriate in ulcerative colitis patients with mild and stable disease previously exposed to ≥3 therapies or with improved endoscopic activity, and in Crohn's disease patients with only scattered aphthous ulcers. The validated threshold for disagreement was not crossed for any scenario. Patient age older than 65 years and a plan for pregnancy in the next year might influence decision-making in some settings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Appropriateness ratings can help guide clinical decision-making about changing therapy to achieve endoscopic remission in asymptomatic patients with IBD until data from ongoing randomized studies are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"420-430"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002964","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A treat-to-target strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) recommends iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical and endoscopic remission. In asymptomatic patients with ongoing endoscopic activity, the risk/benefit balance of this approach is unclear, particularly with prior exposure to advanced therapies.

Methods: Using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, 9 IBD specialists rated appropriateness of changing therapy in 126 scenarios of asymptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and active endoscopic disease. Disease extent and behavior, prior treatment, prior complications, and recent disease progression were considered, as were factors that might influence decision-making, including age and pregnancy. Ratings were collected through anonymous survey, discussed at an in-person meeting, and finalized in a second anonymous survey.

Results: Panelists rated change in therapy as appropriate (i.e., expected benefit sufficiently outweighs potential harms from continuing therapy) in 96/126 scenarios, generally in patients with progressive, complicated, and/or extensive disease, while changing therapy was rated uncertain in 27 scenarios of mild and/or stable disease. Changing therapy was rated inappropriate in ulcerative colitis patients with mild and stable disease previously exposed to ≥3 therapies or with improved endoscopic activity, and in Crohn's disease patients with only scattered aphthous ulcers. The validated threshold for disagreement was not crossed for any scenario. Patient age older than 65 years and a plan for pregnancy in the next year might influence decision-making in some settings.

Discussion: Appropriateness ratings can help guide clinical decision-making about changing therapy to achieve endoscopic remission in asymptomatic patients with IBD until data from ongoing randomized studies are available.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当完美与完美为敌时:无症状 IBD 靶向治疗 RAND 适当性小组的研究结果。
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)的 "靶向治疗 "策略建议反复调整治疗方案,以达到临床和内镜缓解。对于内镜活动仍在持续的无症状患者,这种方法的风险/收益平衡尚不明确,尤其是在之前接受过先进疗法的情况下:方法:9 位 IBD 专家采用兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法,对 126 例无症状的溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)以及活动性内镜疾病患者改变疗法的适宜性进行了评分。考虑因素包括疾病程度和行为、既往治疗情况、既往并发症和近期疾病进展,以及可能影响决策的因素,包括年龄和怀孕。评分通过匿名调查收集,在面对面会议上讨论,并在第二次匿名调查中最终确定:在 96/126 种情况下,专家组成员将改变治疗方法评为适当(即预期获益足以抵消继续治疗的潜在危害),这些患者通常为病情进展、复杂和/或广泛的患者,而在 27 种病情轻微和/或稳定的情况下,改变治疗方法被评为不确定。在病情轻微且稳定的 UC 患者中,既往接受过≥3 种疗法的患者或内镜活动有所改善的患者,以及仅有分散性阿弗他溃疡的 CD 患者中,改变疗法被评为不恰当。在任何情况下均未超过验证的分歧阈值。在某些情况下,患者年龄大于 65 岁以及计划明年怀孕可能会影响决策:结论:在目前正在进行的随机研究获得数据之前,适宜性评级有助于指导临床决策,帮助无症状的 IBD 患者改变疗法以达到内镜下缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
期刊最新文献
A Global Perspective on Metabolically Driven Primary Liver Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges. Effects of Cholestasis on Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis in Patients Following Liver Transplantation: Insights From Mixed Censoring Outcomes. Is It Time to Scale Down the Bristol? Large Single Center Comparison Of Novel and Reusable Duodenoscopes Show Similar Contamination Rates That Do Not Correlate With Clinical Infection. Lyon Score: Key Deficiencies and Discrepancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1