Risk assessment of clinical trial protocols: a tool for hospital pharmacists to reduce human error in experimental drug management.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004154
Giulia Cancellieri, Alessio Provenzani, Carlo Polidori, Piera Polidori
{"title":"Risk assessment of clinical trial protocols: a tool for hospital pharmacists to reduce human error in experimental drug management.","authors":"Giulia Cancellieri, Alessio Provenzani, Carlo Polidori, Piera Polidori","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Hospital pharmacists collaborate in clinical trials by managing the reception, conservation, distribution, return and destruction of the investigational medical products (IMP). However, errors can happen during the simultaneous management of multiple trials because each clinical trial stipulates its own method for managing the drug under study. In order to promote optimal management by hospital pharmacists, we developed a method for calculating a risk of error index for each experimental protocol, and wrote standard procedures for managing trials assigned low, moderate and high risk levels, to provide hospital pharmacists with a systematic tool for reducing human error in the management of IMPs for multiple clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Calculation of this risk of error index (ρ) entails four factors: the pharmacological risk of error (φ) inherent in the pharmacological characteristics and route of administration of the IMP (carcinogenic, mutagenic, cytotoxic nature of the drug, parental or non-parenteral administration), the technological risk of error (α) involved should drug compounding be required, the risk of error related to the number of patients enrolled (n<sub>p</sub>) and the risk of error intrinsic to the protocol (π) when it involves placebos, randomisation or other factors. We developed the formula [Formula: see text] to define trials as low (ρ<50), moderate (51<ρ<150) and high risk (ρ>151) for hospital pharmacist error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calculations of this formula for 60 active trials indicated that seven (11.7%) of the protocols were low risk of hospital pharmacist error, 43 (71.7%) were moderate risk and 10 (16.6%) were high risk. For each of these categories (low, moderate and high risk) we have outlined standard procedures in order to minimise the occurrence of any errors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following validation of our formula and standard procedures by the ISMETT Research Institute, we are promoting the use of the tool in other clinical centres as we believe it can help hospital pharmacists minimise the risk of error in managing experimental drugs for clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hospital pharmacists collaborate in clinical trials by managing the reception, conservation, distribution, return and destruction of the investigational medical products (IMP). However, errors can happen during the simultaneous management of multiple trials because each clinical trial stipulates its own method for managing the drug under study. In order to promote optimal management by hospital pharmacists, we developed a method for calculating a risk of error index for each experimental protocol, and wrote standard procedures for managing trials assigned low, moderate and high risk levels, to provide hospital pharmacists with a systematic tool for reducing human error in the management of IMPs for multiple clinical trials.

Methods: Calculation of this risk of error index (ρ) entails four factors: the pharmacological risk of error (φ) inherent in the pharmacological characteristics and route of administration of the IMP (carcinogenic, mutagenic, cytotoxic nature of the drug, parental or non-parenteral administration), the technological risk of error (α) involved should drug compounding be required, the risk of error related to the number of patients enrolled (np) and the risk of error intrinsic to the protocol (π) when it involves placebos, randomisation or other factors. We developed the formula [Formula: see text] to define trials as low (ρ<50), moderate (51<ρ<150) and high risk (ρ>151) for hospital pharmacist error.

Results: Calculations of this formula for 60 active trials indicated that seven (11.7%) of the protocols were low risk of hospital pharmacist error, 43 (71.7%) were moderate risk and 10 (16.6%) were high risk. For each of these categories (low, moderate and high risk) we have outlined standard procedures in order to minimise the occurrence of any errors.

Conclusions: Following validation of our formula and standard procedures by the ISMETT Research Institute, we are promoting the use of the tool in other clinical centres as we believe it can help hospital pharmacists minimise the risk of error in managing experimental drugs for clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床试验方案风险评估:医院药剂师减少试验药物管理中人为错误的工具。
背景和目的:医院药剂师通过管理研究用医疗产品 (IMP) 的接收、保存、分发、返还和销毁,参与临床试验。然而,在同时管理多个试验的过程中可能会出现错误,因为每个临床试验都规定了自己的研究药物管理方法。为了促进医院药剂师优化管理,我们开发了一种方法,用于计算每个试验方案的错误风险指数,并编写了管理低、中、高风险等级试验的标准程序,为医院药剂师提供了一种系统工具,以减少多项临床试验 IMP 管理中的人为错误:计算错误风险指数 (ρ)需要考虑四个因素:IMP 的药理特性和给药途径(药物的致癌性、致突变性、细胞毒性,亲体或非亲体给药)所固有的药理错误风险 (φ);如果需要配制药物,所涉及的技术错误风险 (α);与入组患者人数有关的错误风险 (np);以及方案固有的错误风险 (π)(如涉及安慰剂、随机化或其他因素)。我们制定了一个公式[公式:见正文]来定义医院药剂师误差低(ρ151)的试验:对 60 项有效试验进行计算后发现,有 7 项(11.7%)试验方案属于医院药剂师失误低风险试验,43 项(71.7%)属于中度风险试验,10 项(16.6%)属于高度风险试验。针对每个类别(低风险、中度风险和高风险),我们都列出了标准程序,以尽量减少错误的发生:在 ISMETT 研究所验证了我们的公式和标准程序后,我们正在其他临床中心推广使用该工具,因为我们相信它能帮助医院药剂师在管理临床试验用药时最大限度地降低出错风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
期刊最新文献
Mobile pharmacies of the Ukrainian chain 'Apteka 9-1-1': access to medicines during the war in Ukraine. Integrating automated dispensing cabinets into the medication dispensing process: feedback from the practice in European hospitals. Cardiovascular events in eGFR-mutation non-small-cell lung cancer patients on osimertinib. Ceftaroline combination therapy for methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia and endocarditis. Predictive performance of glomerular filtration rate equations based on cystatin C, creatinine and their combination in critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1