European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice最新文献

Objectives: Automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) offer improved medication safety, greater efficiency and return on investment. However, integrating ADCs into medication dispensing processes can be challenging in complex hospital environments. This study aimed to draft suggestions to help hospitals adopt ADCs.

Methods: Two-day visits were organised in seven European hospitals operating ADCs. Investigators used an observational grid, a questionnaire and interviews, each divided into the themes of medication processes before and after the introduction of ADCs, the major steps followed and the resources involved, ergonomics and staff perceptions.

Results: ADCs were integrated into four global hospital medication dispensing systems (packs of drugs are distributed from the central pharmacy to wards for dispensing) and three nominative systems-that is, patient-specific ones (drug doses prescribed for individuals are distributed from the central pharmacy to wards with ADC as supplementary stock). A general ADC project implementation timeline was shaped: main drivers of automation to initiate the project, visit of other sites, pilot test (with IT integration and staff training), and evaluation phase (satisfaction, safety, efficiency) to justify a possible expansion. Users (7 pharmacists, 21 nurses, 7 data engineers) identified facilitators (such as a dedicated project manager, a pilot phase, an intuitive device), barriers and any improvements needed (training for incoming staff, reorganisation of ward workflow, dynamic inventories).

Conclusions: Despite their diverse pharmacy organisations, each hospital raised similar challenges and reported analogous major steps in project implementation. Although integration processes are complex, ADCs rapidly provide users with benefits. By following the practical advice and recommendations from these hospitals, new adopters might reduce the risks of failed ADC projects and accelerate their integration.

Objectives: There have been cases of cardiotoxicity induced by osimertinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, limited data exist for a comprehensive cardiotoxicity profile analysis for osimertinib use in NSCLC patients. The aim of this study was to report the entire profile of cardiotoxicities after the initiation of osimertinib in consecutive patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation at a single health system.

Methods: The data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records for all patients who were started on osimertinib for NSCLC at West Virginia University Health System. Prevalence of heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation, and prolonged QT before and after starting osimertinib were calculated.

Results: This study had 116 participants and the median age was 72 years. The frequency of each new cardiotoxicity was between 6% and 9%, and the overall percentage of patients who had developed any of the four cardiotoxicities while on osimertinib was 19.9%. The median time of follow-up was 477 days and the median time on osimertinib for all patients was 390 days. The strongest risk factor in predicting a new onset cardiac event was hypertension with a hazard ratio (HR) of 6.35 (confidence interval (CI) 1.48 to 27.23, p=0.013) and HR 5.36 (CI 1.23 to 23.39, p=0.025) in univariate and multivariate analysis respectively.

Conclusion: Osimertinib appears to be associated with an increase in cardiac abnormalities. Given the association between this medication exposure and the observed cardiac toxicities, use of osimertinib may entail closer cardiac monitoring of electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram abnormalities.

Objective: We report our experience with the use of ceftaroline in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin for methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia.

Methods: A multicentre retrospective study was carried out at three institutions of adult patients with methicillin resistant S. epidermidis or S. lugdunensis bacteraemia who were managed with either daptomycin or vancomycin in combination with ceftaroline.

Results: Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients who received combination therapy had sterile blood cultures on the subsequent blood cultures drawn following ceftaroline initiation. Those who received ceftaroline combination within 7 days had a faster time to blood culture sterilisation than those who received ceftaroline combination therapy after 7 days (6 (3-7) days vs 17 (12-19) days, p=0.031).

Conclusions: The results from this case series support the use of ceftaroline combination therapy in patients with methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia whose blood cultures failed to sterilise with vancomycin or daptomycin alone.

Objectives: Clinical trials are an opportunity for patients to access innovative therapy, but patient inclusion in clinical trials can also result in cost savings for hospitals. Our objective was to evaluate the economic impact of clinical trials drug cost savings in a French academic institution from the perspectives of both the French Health Insurance (FHI) and hospitals.

Methods: A retrospective, observational, cost saving analysis was performed on all the clinical trials initiated in our university hospital between 2015 and 2020. Only trials involving an investigational medicinal product were considered. Drug cost savings were defined as the best standard of care, defined in the protocol, whose cost was covered by a sponsor.

Results: Of the 646 trials undertaken during the 6 years analysed, 21% (212/646) led to cost savings, mostly driven by the industrial sponsor (92%, €6 984 283/€7 591 612) for a total of €7 591 612 (91% from the FHI's perspective (€6 959 115/€7 591 612)). Oncology trials generated 79.1% (€6 004 966/€7 591 612) of global cost savings, mostly driven by onco-haematology (33.1%, €1 983 146/€6 004 966), onco-pneumology (29.2%, €1 754 333/€6 004 966) and onco-dermatology (23.5%, €1 409 553/€6 004 966) followed by hepatogastroenterology trials (6.9%, €413 113/€6 004 966). Of the 162 drugs, the top 15 generated 75.3% (€5 715 479/€7 591 612) of savings and were grouped together: 12 antineoplastic agents (six per os and six intravenous) and three per os antiviral for hepatitis C.

Conclusions: With ever-changing prices and new innovative treatments, such cost avoidance must be regularly evaluated. We provided objective evidence that clinical trials could achieve potential cost savings for the FHI and hospitals, in addition to the potential benefit to patients of having access to innovative investigational medicinal products.

Purpose: To determine the physical compatibility of 10% calcium chloride and 10% calcium gluconate in combination with injectable solutions, administered in the paediatric and adult intensive care unit setting during toxicological resuscitation involving calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers.

Methods: Forty-eight combinations were prepared at room temperature, including the following products: calcium chloride, calcium gluconate, insulin, epinephrine, norepinephrine, highly concentrated dextrose solution, sodium chloride, Plasma-Lyte A and Ringer's lactate. A visual evaluation at times 0, 1, 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours and a particle count test with the LS-20 particle counter at times 0, 4, 24 and 72 hours were performed. The admixtures were considered incompatible if there was a precipitate, a colour change, turbidity, viscosity or a gas formation. The stability of calcium salts was also tested in empty IV bags and syringes by the particle count test.

Results: All drug mixtures were found to be compatible by visual evaluation and using the particle counter based on United States Pharmacopoeia chapter 788 (USP<788>) specifications. Calcium salts were compatible with insulin and vasopressors in the tested combinations. The stability of 10% calcium salts in empty IV bags and polypropylene syringes was demonstrated for up to 48 hours at room temperature.

Conclusion: All the combinations tested were physically compatible for up to 72 hours at room temperature. Clinical use of calcium salt infusions, at an undiluted concentration, in combination with these injectable solutions in a toxicological resuscitation context is considered clinically acceptable.

Objectives: Prefilled syringes (PFS) may offer clinical and economic advantages over conventional parenteral medication delivery methods (vials and ampoules). The benefits of converting from vials and ampoules to PFS have been explained in previous drug-specific economic models; however, these models have limited generalisability to different drugs, healthcare settings and other countries. Our study aims to (1) present a comprehensive economic model to assess the impact of switching from vials to PFS delivery; and (2) illustrate through two case studies the model's utility by highlighting important features of shifting from vials to PFS.

Methods: The economic model estimates the potential benefit of switching to PFS associated with four key outcomes: preventable adverse drug events (pADE), preparation time, unused drugs, and cost of supplies. Model reference values were derived from existing peer-reviewed literature sources. The user inputs specific information related to the department, drug, and dose of interest and can change reference values. Two hypothetical case studies are presented to showcase model utility. The first concerns a cardiac intensive care unit in the United Kingdom administering 30 doses of 1 mg/10 mL atropine/day. The second concerns a coronavirus (COVID-19) intensive care unit in France that administers 30 doses of 10 mg/25 mL ephedrine/day.

Results: Total cost savings per hospital per year, associated with reductions in pADEs, unused drugs, drug cost and cost of supplies were £34 829 for the atropine example and €104 570 for the ephedrine example. Annual preparation time decreased by 371 and 234 hours in the atropine and ephedrine examples, respectively.

Conclusions: The model provides a generalisable framework with customisable inputs, giving hospitals a comprehensive view of the clinical and economic value of adopting PFS. Despite increased costs per dose with PFS, the hypothetical case studies showed notable reductions in medication preparation time and a net budget savings owing to fewer pADEs and reduced drug wastage.

Objectives: Evidence on the effectiveness of remdesivir when used in real-life clinical practice is controversial. This study aims to analyse its effectiveness and the factors associated with increased mortality in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who require supplemental low-flow oxygen and received remdesivir.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) which included all patients treated with remdesivir in our institution during the second pandemic breakout in Spain, from August to November 2020. Treatment with remdesivir was limited to non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring low-flow supplemental oxygen, with a treatment duration of 5 days.

Results: A total of 1757 patients were admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia during the study period, of which 281 non-critically ill patients were treated with remdesivir and included in the analysis. Mortality at 28 days after initiation of treatment was 17.1%. The median (IQR) time to recovery was 9 days (6-15). 104 (37.0%) patients had complications during hospitalisation, with renal failure being the most frequent (31 patients; 36.5%). After adjustment for confounding factors, high-flow oxygen therapy was associated with increased 28-day mortality (HR 2.77; 95% CI 1.39 to 5.53; p=0.004) and decreased 28-day clinical improvement (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.85; p=0.008). A significant difference in survival and clinical improvement was identified between patients treated with high and low-flow oxygen.

Conclusion: The 28-day mortality rate in patients treated with remdesivir needing low-flow oxygen therapy was higher than that published in clinical trials. Age and increased oxygen therapy needed after the beginning of treatment were the main risk factors associated with mortality.

Objectives: Evaluate health literacy in transplant patients to better tailor the content of their continuing therapeutic education.

Methods: A 20-item questionnaire divided into five themes (sport/recreation, dietary measures, hygiene measures, recognition of the signs of graft rejection and medication management) was sent to transplant patient associations. Participants' responses (a score out of 20 points), were analysed according to demographic characteristics, transplanted organ (kidney, liver or heart), type of donor (living or deceased), participation in a therapeutic patient education (TPE) programme, management of end-stage renal disease (with or without dialysis) and the date of transplant.

Results: 327 individuals completed the questionnaires (mean age 63.3±12.7 years, mean time post-transplant 13.1±12.1 years). From 2 years after transplantation, the patients' score decreases significantly compared with the score obtained at hospital discharge. Patients who received TPE had significantly higher scores than patients who did not receive it, but only in the first 2 years post-transplant. The scores were different depending on the organs transplanted. Patients' knowledge varied according to the theme; the percentage of errors being higher for questions related to hygienic and dietary rules.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of the role of the clinical pharmacist in maintaining the transplant recipient's health literacy level over time to increase graft life. We show the topics on which pharmacists must acquire solid knowledge to best meet the needs of transplant patients.