Effect of resistance training on physical function during chemotherapy in colon cancer.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY JNCI Cancer Spectrum Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkae058
Justin C Brown, Shengping Yang, Stephanie L E Compton, Kristin L Campbell, Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano, Sara Quinney, Barbara Sternfeld, Bette J Caan, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt, Kathryn H Schmitz
{"title":"Effect of resistance training on physical function during chemotherapy in colon cancer.","authors":"Justin C Brown, Shengping Yang, Stephanie L E Compton, Kristin L Campbell, Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano, Sara Quinney, Barbara Sternfeld, Bette J Caan, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt, Kathryn H Schmitz","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The decline of physical function during chemotherapy predicts poor quality of life and premature death. It is unknown if resistance training prevents physical function decline during chemotherapy in colon cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter trial randomly assigned 181 colon cancer survivors receiving postoperative chemotherapy to home-based resistance training or usual care control. Physical function outcomes included the short physical performance battery, isometric handgrip strength, and the physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36-item questionnaire. Mixed models for repeated measures quantified estimated treatment differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, participants had a mean (SD) age of 55.2 (12.8) years; 67 (37%) were 60 years or older, and 29 (16%) had a composite short physical performance battery score of no more than 9. Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve the composite short physical performance battery score (estimated treatment difference = -0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.32 to 0.31; P = .98) or the short physical performance battery scores for balance (estimated treatment difference = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.11; P = .93), gait speed (estimated treatment difference = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.22; P = .28), and sit-to-stand (estimated treatment difference = -0.08, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.13; P = .46). Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve isometric handgrip strength (estimated treatment difference = 1.50 kg, 95% CI = -1.06 to 4.05; P = .25) or self-reported physical function (estimated treatment difference = -3.55, 95% CI = -10.03 to 2.94); P = .28). The baseline short physical performance battery balance score (r = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.35) and handgrip strength (r = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.36) correlated with chemotherapy relative dose intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among colon cancer survivors with relatively high physical functioning, random assignment to home-based resistance training did not prevent physical function decline during chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT03291951.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The decline of physical function during chemotherapy predicts poor quality of life and premature death. It is unknown if resistance training prevents physical function decline during chemotherapy in colon cancer survivors.

Methods: This multicenter trial randomly assigned 181 colon cancer survivors receiving postoperative chemotherapy to home-based resistance training or usual care control. Physical function outcomes included the short physical performance battery, isometric handgrip strength, and the physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36-item questionnaire. Mixed models for repeated measures quantified estimated treatment differences.

Results: At baseline, participants had a mean (SD) age of 55.2 (12.8) years; 67 (37%) were 60 years or older, and 29 (16%) had a composite short physical performance battery score of no more than 9. Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve the composite short physical performance battery score (estimated treatment difference = -0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.32 to 0.31; P = .98) or the short physical performance battery scores for balance (estimated treatment difference = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.11; P = .93), gait speed (estimated treatment difference = 0.08, 95% CI = -0.06 to 0.22; P = .28), and sit-to-stand (estimated treatment difference = -0.08, 95% CI = -0.29 to 0.13; P = .46). Compared with usual care control, resistance training did not improve isometric handgrip strength (estimated treatment difference = 1.50 kg, 95% CI = -1.06 to 4.05; P = .25) or self-reported physical function (estimated treatment difference = -3.55, 95% CI = -10.03 to 2.94); P = .28). The baseline short physical performance battery balance score (r = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.35) and handgrip strength (r = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.36) correlated with chemotherapy relative dose intensity.

Conclusion: Among colon cancer survivors with relatively high physical functioning, random assignment to home-based resistance training did not prevent physical function decline during chemotherapy.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03291951.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阻力训练对结肠癌化疗期间身体功能的影响
背景:化疗期间身体功能的下降预示着生活质量的下降和过早死亡。抗阻力训练是否能预防结肠癌幸存者化疗期间身体机能下降尚不清楚:这项多中心试验将 181 名接受术后化疗的结肠癌幸存者随机分配到家庭阻力训练或常规护理对照组。身体功能结果包括短期体能测试 (SPPB)、等长手握力和医学结果短表 36 项问卷的身体功能分量表。重复测量混合模型量化了估计治疗差异(ETD):基线时,受试者的平均(标清)年龄为 55.2 岁(12.8);67 人(37%)的年龄≥60 岁,29 人(16%)的 SPPB 综合评分≤9 分。与对照组相比,阻力训练没有改善 SPPB 综合评分 [ETD: -0.01 (95% CI: -0.32, 0.31); P = 0.98],也没有改善 SPPB 平衡评分 [ETD: 0.01 (95% CI: -0.10, 0.11); P = 0.93]、步速[ETD: 0.08 (95% CI: -0.06, 0.22) P = 0.28]和坐立[ETD: -0.08 (95% CI: -0.29, 0.13); P = 0.46]。与对照组相比,阻力训练并未改善等长手握强度[ETD:1.50 kg (95% CI:-1.06, 4.05);P = 0.25]或自我报告的身体功能[ETD:-3.55 (95% CI:-10.03, 2.94);P = 0.28]。基线 SPPB 平衡评分[r=0.21 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.35)]和握力[r=0.23 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.36)]与化疗相对剂量强度相关:结论:在身体机能相对较高的结肠癌幸存者中,随机进行家庭阻力训练并不能防止化疗期间身体机能的下降:临床试验注册:NCT03291951
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Revisiting surrogacy of pathological complete response for long-term survival in triple negative breast cancer. Antibiotic treatment and survival in patients with resected, early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving chemotherapy. Do trial benefits predict real-world gains in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Prostate cancer screening in the Middle East and North Africa: a cross-sectional study on current practices. The use of large language models to enhance cancer clinical trial educational materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1