Extrusion of debris during retreatment using various nickel-titanium files in teeth with simulated lateral root perforation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.24-0078
Hatice Harorlı, Simay Koç, Alper Kuştarcı
{"title":"Extrusion of debris during retreatment using various nickel-titanium files in teeth with simulated lateral root perforation.","authors":"Hatice Harorlı, Simay Koç, Alper Kuştarcı","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.24-0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the influence of various nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) files on debris extrusion during the retreatment of teeth with simulated lateral root perforation, focusing on root resorption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty human mandibular premolar teeth were divided into groups with and without perforation and further subdivided based on the retreatment technique. Lateral root perforations were created in one group (Group 1), while the other group had no perforations (Group 2). Two retreatment techniques were compared: Remover (RE)+One RECI (OR) and ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTUR)+WaveOne Gold (WOG). The weight of the extruded debris was determined. The time of both retreatment procedures was measured. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Teeth with simulated lateral root perforation exhibited higher extrusion of debris during retreatment. In both groups, RE+OR files led to more extruded debris than PTUR+WOG files. However, this difference was statistically significant in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Compared to PTUR+WOG files, RE+OR files showed a statistically significant longer time to remove obturation material (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perforated teeth exhibited significantly higher debris extrusion. While both file systems demonstrated similar debris extrusion in perforated teeth, the RE+OR files significantly increased debris extrusion in non-perforated teeth compared to the PTUR+WOG files.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.24-0078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the influence of various nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) files on debris extrusion during the retreatment of teeth with simulated lateral root perforation, focusing on root resorption.

Methods: Sixty human mandibular premolar teeth were divided into groups with and without perforation and further subdivided based on the retreatment technique. Lateral root perforations were created in one group (Group 1), while the other group had no perforations (Group 2). Two retreatment techniques were compared: Remover (RE)+One RECI (OR) and ProTaper Universal Retreatment (PTUR)+WaveOne Gold (WOG). The weight of the extruded debris was determined. The time of both retreatment procedures was measured. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (P < 0.05).

Results: Teeth with simulated lateral root perforation exhibited higher extrusion of debris during retreatment. In both groups, RE+OR files led to more extruded debris than PTUR+WOG files. However, this difference was statistically significant in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Compared to PTUR+WOG files, RE+OR files showed a statistically significant longer time to remove obturation material (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Perforated teeth exhibited significantly higher debris extrusion. While both file systems demonstrated similar debris extrusion in perforated teeth, the RE+OR files significantly increased debris extrusion in non-perforated teeth compared to the PTUR+WOG files.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用各种镍钛锉对模拟侧根穿孔的牙齿进行再治疗时碎片的挤出。
目的:研究各种镍钛(Ni-Ti)锉对模拟侧根穿孔牙齿再治疗过程中碎屑挤出的影响,重点关注牙根吸收:将 60 颗人类下颌前磨牙分为有穿孔组和无穿孔组,并根据再治疗技术进一步细分。其中一组(第 1 组)进行了侧根穿孔,而另一组(第 2 组)则没有穿孔。比较了两种再治疗技术:Remover(RE)+One RECI(OR)和ProTaper Universal Retreatment(PTUR)+WaveOne Gold(WOG)。测定了挤出碎片的重量。测量两个再治疗过程的时间。统计分析采用双向方差分析(ANOVA)检验(P < 0.05):结果:模拟侧根穿孔的牙齿在再治疗过程中碎屑的挤出量更高。在两组中,RE+OR锉比PTUR+WOG锉挤出的碎屑更多。但在第2组中,这一差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。与PTUR+WOG锉相比,RE+OR锉去除闭塞材料的时间更长(P < 0.001),具有统计学意义:结论:穿孔牙的碎屑挤出量明显更高。虽然两种锉系统在穿孔牙中的碎屑挤出量相似,但与PTUR+WOG锉相比,RE+OR锉在非穿孔牙中的碎屑挤出量明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of maxillary first molar accessory root canal morphology in a Black South African subpopulation. Attitudes of general and specialist French practitioners toward stage III-IV grade C periodontitis with familial aggregation. Clinical behavior and survival of endodontically treated teeth with or without post placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CAD-CAM for removable partial denture fabrication after marginal mandibulectomy based on a well-adjusted pre-existing denture. Assessment of cytotoxicity, odontoblast-like differentiation, shear bond strength, and microhardness of four orthodontic adhesive composites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1