{"title":"Impact of aging on peribiliary glands in ischemia–reperfusion injury","authors":"Kaoru Katano, Shinichi Nakanuma, Tomokazu Tokoro, Ryohei Takei, Satoshi Takada, Mitsuyoshi Okazaki, Kaichiro Kato, Isamu Makino, Kenichi Harada, Shintaro Yagi","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The detailed mechanisms underlying the development of ischemia-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) in aged donor grafts remain unclear. In the present study we aimed to investigate the impact of aging on the response of the peribiliary gland (PBG) to ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) and its temporal changes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Experiments were performed using a 90-min partial warm liver ischemia model in male Wistar rats of two age groups: young (7–8 weeks old) and old (52–60 weeks old). Liver tissues were obtained 24, 72, and 168 h after IRI. Histopathological and immunohistochemical assessments of the perihilar bile duct (PHBD), including the PBG, distal to the clip-clamped site were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Young rats showed little change in the bile duct tissues after IRI. However, old rats showed an increased PBG volume in the PHBD and marked PBG cell proliferation 24 h after IRI. Bile duct wall thickening with narrowing of the lumen peaked 72 h after IRI. Mucus production and oxidative stress in the PBG were significantly higher in old than in young rats after IRI. These findings showed a trend toward improvement 168 h after IRI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Age-dependent differences in the response of the PBG to IRI may be related to differences in ITBL frequency.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The detailed mechanisms underlying the development of ischemia-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) in aged donor grafts remain unclear. In the present study we aimed to investigate the impact of aging on the response of the peribiliary gland (PBG) to ischemia–reperfusion injury (IRI) and its temporal changes.
Methods
Experiments were performed using a 90-min partial warm liver ischemia model in male Wistar rats of two age groups: young (7–8 weeks old) and old (52–60 weeks old). Liver tissues were obtained 24, 72, and 168 h after IRI. Histopathological and immunohistochemical assessments of the perihilar bile duct (PHBD), including the PBG, distal to the clip-clamped site were performed.
Results
Young rats showed little change in the bile duct tissues after IRI. However, old rats showed an increased PBG volume in the PHBD and marked PBG cell proliferation 24 h after IRI. Bile duct wall thickening with narrowing of the lumen peaked 72 h after IRI. Mucus production and oxidative stress in the PBG were significantly higher in old than in young rats after IRI. These findings showed a trend toward improvement 168 h after IRI.
Conclusion
Age-dependent differences in the response of the PBG to IRI may be related to differences in ITBL frequency.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.