An optimized protocol for pig intestinal mucosa proteomics

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jprot.2024.105257
Hanne De Rijcke , Kris Gevaert , An Staes , Stefaan De Smet , Marc Heyndrickx , Sam Millet , Christof Van Poucke
{"title":"An optimized protocol for pig intestinal mucosa proteomics","authors":"Hanne De Rijcke ,&nbsp;Kris Gevaert ,&nbsp;An Staes ,&nbsp;Stefaan De Smet ,&nbsp;Marc Heyndrickx ,&nbsp;Sam Millet ,&nbsp;Christof Van Poucke","doi":"10.1016/j.jprot.2024.105257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The overall well-being of organisms is widely recognized to be closely intertwined with their intestinal health. The intestinal mucosal layer plays a pivotal role in ensuring the proper functioning of the intestine, a fact observed not only in humans but also in animals like pigs. Any alterations to the mucosal layer of a pig's intestine can potentially disrupt its functionality, thereby impacting the animal's health and productivity. Mass spectrometry-based proteome analysis serves as a valuable tool in investigating the intricate dynamics of the proteome within the intestinal mucosa. Such studies hold promise in uncovering causal relationships between mucosal changes and overall health outcomes in pigs. It is anticipated that insights gathered from proteome studies will inform future strategies aimed at enhancing the health and productivity of pigs. However, the research field lacks a standardized and detailed method to extract proteins from pig intestinal mucosa and prepare proteins for proteome analysis. In the present study, we evaluated three alternative S-Trap-based protocols for analyzing ileal mucosal scrapings from pigs. Samples were either freeze-dried and treated as solid samples or ground in liquid nitrogen, categorized as either solid or liquid samples. In our analysis, a total of 2840 proteins were identified across all samples. Through statistical analysis and gene ontology examinations, we investigated potential differences between the three approaches. Even though our findings revealed no significant differences among the three methods, we propose the use of the protocol wherein samples are freeze-dried and treated as solid for protein extraction. This protocol stands out as the most convenient and practical option, offering ease of use and ensuring consistent and reliable results. By establishing a standardized approach, we aim to advance research efforts in understanding pig intestinal health.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The development of an optimized protocol for protein extraction of intestinal mucosal scrapings in pigs addresses a gap in the field and enhances future research on pig intestinal health. By use of the protocol and mass spectrometry-based proteome analysis, valuable insights for improving the health and productivity of pigs can be presented. Studying the complex dynamics of the proteome within the intestinal mucosa, potentially identifying links between mucosal changes and health outcomes, provides us with information about the critical connection between intestinal health and the overall well-being and productivity of pigs. By creating a standardized approach, consistent, reliable, and reproducible results can be obtained for this type of research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874391924001891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overall well-being of organisms is widely recognized to be closely intertwined with their intestinal health. The intestinal mucosal layer plays a pivotal role in ensuring the proper functioning of the intestine, a fact observed not only in humans but also in animals like pigs. Any alterations to the mucosal layer of a pig's intestine can potentially disrupt its functionality, thereby impacting the animal's health and productivity. Mass spectrometry-based proteome analysis serves as a valuable tool in investigating the intricate dynamics of the proteome within the intestinal mucosa. Such studies hold promise in uncovering causal relationships between mucosal changes and overall health outcomes in pigs. It is anticipated that insights gathered from proteome studies will inform future strategies aimed at enhancing the health and productivity of pigs. However, the research field lacks a standardized and detailed method to extract proteins from pig intestinal mucosa and prepare proteins for proteome analysis. In the present study, we evaluated three alternative S-Trap-based protocols for analyzing ileal mucosal scrapings from pigs. Samples were either freeze-dried and treated as solid samples or ground in liquid nitrogen, categorized as either solid or liquid samples. In our analysis, a total of 2840 proteins were identified across all samples. Through statistical analysis and gene ontology examinations, we investigated potential differences between the three approaches. Even though our findings revealed no significant differences among the three methods, we propose the use of the protocol wherein samples are freeze-dried and treated as solid for protein extraction. This protocol stands out as the most convenient and practical option, offering ease of use and ensuring consistent and reliable results. By establishing a standardized approach, we aim to advance research efforts in understanding pig intestinal health.

Significance

The development of an optimized protocol for protein extraction of intestinal mucosal scrapings in pigs addresses a gap in the field and enhances future research on pig intestinal health. By use of the protocol and mass spectrometry-based proteome analysis, valuable insights for improving the health and productivity of pigs can be presented. Studying the complex dynamics of the proteome within the intestinal mucosa, potentially identifying links between mucosal changes and health outcomes, provides us with information about the critical connection between intestinal health and the overall well-being and productivity of pigs. By creating a standardized approach, consistent, reliable, and reproducible results can be obtained for this type of research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
猪肠粘膜蛋白质组学的优化方案。
人们普遍认为,生物体的整体健康与其肠道健康密切相关。肠道粘膜层在确保肠道正常功能方面发挥着举足轻重的作用,这一点不仅在人类身上可以看到,在猪等动物身上也可以看到。猪肠粘膜层的任何改变都有可能破坏其功能,从而影响动物的健康和生产力。基于质谱的蛋白质组分析是研究肠道粘膜内蛋白质组复杂动态的重要工具。此类研究有望揭示猪的粘膜变化与整体健康结果之间的因果关系。预计从蛋白质组研究中获得的见解将为未来旨在提高猪的健康和生产率的策略提供依据。然而,该研究领域缺乏从猪肠粘膜中提取蛋白质并制备蛋白质进行蛋白质组分析的标准化详细方法。在本研究中,我们评估了三种可供选择的基于 S-Trap 的猪回肠粘膜刮片分析方案。样本要么冷冻干燥并作为固体样本处理,要么在液氮中研磨,然后归类为固体或液体样本。在我们的分析中,所有样本中共鉴定出 2840 种蛋白质。通过统计分析和基因本体检查,我们研究了三种方法之间的潜在差异。尽管我们的研究结果显示这三种方法之间没有明显的差异,但我们建议使用将样本冻干并处理成固体的方案来提取蛋白质。这种方法最为方便实用,不仅易于使用,还能确保结果的一致性和可靠性。通过建立标准化方法,我们旨在推动了解猪肠道健康的研究工作。意义:猪肠道粘膜刮片蛋白质提取优化方案的开发填补了该领域的空白,并加强了未来对猪肠道健康的研究。通过使用该方案和基于质谱的蛋白质组分析,可为改善猪的健康和生产率提供有价值的见解。研究肠道粘膜内蛋白质组的复杂动态,可能会发现粘膜变化与健康结果之间的联系,从而为我们提供有关肠道健康与猪的整体健康和生产率之间重要联系的信息。通过创建标准化方法,可以为此类研究获得一致、可靠和可重复的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1