Etiological differences in demographics, clinical course and consequences of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.

Q4 Medicine Wiadomosci lekarskie Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36740/WLek202405105
Tetiana V Formanchuk
{"title":"Etiological differences in demographics, clinical course and consequences of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.","authors":"Tetiana V Formanchuk","doi":"10.36740/WLek202405105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim: The study is intended to consider acute pancreatitis from the point of view of its etiological structure, as well as demographic description, features of the clinical course, distribution of morphological forms, severity and consequences of the disease in different etiological variants.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Materials and Methods: The work was based on a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 677 patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent inpatient treatment from 2017 to 2022 in an emergency hospital and a tertiary regional hospital in Vinnytsia, Ukraine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: The etiological structure of the general sample was as follows: the alimentary factors - 37,5% of cases, biliary - 18,6%, alcohol - 14,0% and postoperative - 7,8%, respectively. The oldest patients were observed in the group with biliary AP (age [median, interquartile range] 61 [46-72] years), the youngest - in the group with alcoholic AP (age [median, interquartile range] 40 [35-47] years). Men significantly predominated in the groups with alimentary and alcoholic AP. A significant predominance of women was observed in the group with biliary AP (62,7% vs. 37,3%, p=0,0003). The highest mortality was in the alcoholic AP group (22,1%), also here was a significantly lower rate of inpatient bed days (6,0). Edematous AP was dominant in all etiological variants. While infected necrotic pancreatitis was significantly more often found in patients with alcoholic genesis (7,4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conclusions: The etiologic variations of acute pancreatitis differ by demographic and clinical indicators and require more detailed study to understand its prognosis, management, and development of effective prevention and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23643,"journal":{"name":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","volume":"77 5","pages":"909-918"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiadomosci lekarskie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202405105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim: The study is intended to consider acute pancreatitis from the point of view of its etiological structure, as well as demographic description, features of the clinical course, distribution of morphological forms, severity and consequences of the disease in different etiological variants.

Patients and methods: Materials and Methods: The work was based on a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 677 patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent inpatient treatment from 2017 to 2022 in an emergency hospital and a tertiary regional hospital in Vinnytsia, Ukraine.

Results: Results: The etiological structure of the general sample was as follows: the alimentary factors - 37,5% of cases, biliary - 18,6%, alcohol - 14,0% and postoperative - 7,8%, respectively. The oldest patients were observed in the group with biliary AP (age [median, interquartile range] 61 [46-72] years), the youngest - in the group with alcoholic AP (age [median, interquartile range] 40 [35-47] years). Men significantly predominated in the groups with alimentary and alcoholic AP. A significant predominance of women was observed in the group with biliary AP (62,7% vs. 37,3%, p=0,0003). The highest mortality was in the alcoholic AP group (22,1%), also here was a significantly lower rate of inpatient bed days (6,0). Edematous AP was dominant in all etiological variants. While infected necrotic pancreatitis was significantly more often found in patients with alcoholic genesis (7,4%).

Conclusion: Conclusions: The etiologic variations of acute pancreatitis differ by demographic and clinical indicators and require more detailed study to understand its prognosis, management, and development of effective prevention and treatment strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性胰腺炎的人口统计学、临床过程和后果的病因差异:一项回顾性研究。
研究目的目的:本研究旨在从急性胰腺炎的病因结构、人口学描述、临床病程特点、形态分布、严重程度和不同病因变异的疾病后果等角度对急性胰腺炎进行研究:材料与方法该项工作基于对 2017 年至 2022 年期间在乌克兰文尼察的一家急诊医院和一家三级地区医院接受住院治疗的 677 名急性胰腺炎患者病历的回顾性分析:结果:结果:一般样本的病因结构如下:消化道因素--分别占病例的37.5%、胆道因素--18.6%、酒精因素--14.0%和术后因素--7.8%。年龄最大的患者出现在胆道性 AP 组(年龄[中位数,四分位数间距] 61 [46-72] 岁),年龄最小的患者出现在酒精性 AP 组(年龄[中位数,四分位数间距] 40 [35-47] 岁)。在消化性和酒精性 AP 组中,男性明显占多数。在胆道 AP 组中,女性明显占多数(62.7% 对 37.3%,P=0.0003)。酒精性 AP 组死亡率最高(22.1%),住院天数也明显较少(6.0 天)。在所有病因变异中,水肿性胰腺炎占主导地位。而感染性坏死性胰腺炎则多见于酒精性胰腺炎患者(7.4%):结论急性胰腺炎的病因变异因人口统计学和临床指标而异,需要进行更详细的研究,以了解其预后、管理并制定有效的预防和治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiadomosci lekarskie
Wiadomosci lekarskie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
482
期刊最新文献
Abuse of right during application of coercive medical measures in criminal proceedings. Aggressive parenting: social, medical and legal aspects. Clinical classification of liver cirrhosis - a way to plan individual definitive treatment. Comparative analysis of the quality of life of women who left the territory of Ukraine during the ongoing Russia - Ukraine war and women who stayed at their homes. COVID-19 associated anosmia in pediatric patients: subject publications review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1