Nurse judgements of hospitalized patients' safety concerns are affected by patient, nurse and event characteristics: A factorial survey experiment.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17372
Patricia S Groves, Amany Farag, Yelena Perkhounkova, Janice A Sabin, Matthew J Witry, Brad Wright
{"title":"Nurse judgements of hospitalized patients' safety concerns are affected by patient, nurse and event characteristics: A factorial survey experiment.","authors":"Patricia S Groves, Amany Farag, Yelena Perkhounkova, Janice A Sabin, Matthew J Witry, Brad Wright","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test the influences of patient, safety event and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements of credibility, importance and intent to report patients' safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Factorial survey experiment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 240 nurses were recruited and completed an online survey including demographic information and responses to eight factorial vignettes consisting of unique combinations of eight patient and event factors. Hierarchical multivariate analysis was used to test influences of vignette factors and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraclass coefficients for nurse judgements suggest that the variation among nurses exceeded the influence of contextual vignette factors. Several significant sources of nurse variation were identified, including race/ethnicity, suggesting a complex relationship between nurses' characteristics and their potential biases, and the influence of personal and patient factors on nurses' judgements, including the decision to report safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses are key players in the system to manage patient safety concerns. Variation among nurses and how they respond to scenarios of patient safety concerns highlight the need for nurse-level intervention.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Complex factors influence nurses' judgement, interpretation and reporting of patients' safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Understanding nurse judgement regarding patient-expressed safety concerns is critical for designing processes and systems that promote reporting. Multiple event and patient characteristics (type of event and apparent harm, and patient gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and communication approach) as well as participant characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, years of experience and primary hospital area) impacted participants' judgements of credibility, degree of concern and intent to report. These findings will help guide patient safety nurse education and training.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Members of the public, including patient advocates, were involved in content validation of the vignette scenarios, norming photographs used in the factorial survey and testing the survey functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"493-506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To test the influences of patient, safety event and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements of credibility, importance and intent to report patients' safety concerns.

Design: Factorial survey experiment.

Methods: A total of 240 nurses were recruited and completed an online survey including demographic information and responses to eight factorial vignettes consisting of unique combinations of eight patient and event factors. Hierarchical multivariate analysis was used to test influences of vignette factors and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements.

Results: The intraclass coefficients for nurse judgements suggest that the variation among nurses exceeded the influence of contextual vignette factors. Several significant sources of nurse variation were identified, including race/ethnicity, suggesting a complex relationship between nurses' characteristics and their potential biases, and the influence of personal and patient factors on nurses' judgements, including the decision to report safety concerns.

Conclusion: Nurses are key players in the system to manage patient safety concerns. Variation among nurses and how they respond to scenarios of patient safety concerns highlight the need for nurse-level intervention.

Implications for the profession and patient care: Complex factors influence nurses' judgement, interpretation and reporting of patients' safety concerns.

Impact: Understanding nurse judgement regarding patient-expressed safety concerns is critical for designing processes and systems that promote reporting. Multiple event and patient characteristics (type of event and apparent harm, and patient gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and communication approach) as well as participant characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, years of experience and primary hospital area) impacted participants' judgements of credibility, degree of concern and intent to report. These findings will help guide patient safety nurse education and training.

Reporting method: STROBE guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: Members of the public, including patient advocates, were involved in content validation of the vignette scenarios, norming photographs used in the factorial survey and testing the survey functionality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士对住院病人安全问题的判断受病人、护士和事件特征的影响:一项因子调查实验。
目的:测试病人、安全事件和护士的特征对护士判断病人安全问题的可信度、重要性和报告意图的影响:设计:因子调查实验:共招募了 240 名护士并完成了一项在线调查,调查内容包括人口统计学信息以及对由八种患者和事件因素独特组合而成的八个因子小故事的回答。采用层次多元分析来检验小故事因素和护士特征对护士判断的影响:结果:护士判断的类内系数表明,护士之间的差异超过了背景小插图因素的影响。结果:护士判断的类内系数表明,护士之间的差异超过了背景小节因素的影响。发现了护士差异的几个重要来源,包括种族/民族,这表明护士的特征与潜在偏见之间存在复杂的关系,以及个人和患者因素对护士判断的影响,包括报告安全问题的决定:护士是患者安全问题管理系统中的关键角色。护士之间的差异以及他们如何应对患者安全问题的情景,凸显了护士层面干预的必要性:护士对患者安全问题的判断、解释和报告受到复杂因素的影响:影响:了解护士对患者表达的安全问题的判断对于设计促进报告的流程和系统至关重要。多种事件和患者特征(事件类型和明显伤害、患者性别、种族/民族、社会经济地位和沟通方式)以及参与者特征(种族/民族、性别、工作年限和主要医院区域)影响着参与者对可信度、关注程度和报告意图的判断。这些发现将有助于指导患者安全护士的教育和培训:报告方法:STROBE 指南:患者或公众的贡献:包括患者权益倡导者在内的公众成员参与了小插图情景的内容验证、因子调查中使用的照片规范化以及调查功能测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses regarding airway clearance in neurocritical illness patients: A cross-sectional study. Capturing patient mobility levels in the hospital: An examination of nursing charting and behavioural mapping. Model of predicting fear of cancer recurrence in patients with digestive tract cancer: A cross-sectional study. Nurse judgements of hospitalized patients' safety concerns are affected by patient, nurse and event characteristics: A factorial survey experiment. Prevalence and characteristics of the 'bad feeling' among healthcare professionals in the context of emergency situations: A Bi-Hospital Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1