Identifying Community-Based Entrustable Professional Activities for Medical Students Through a Modified Delphi Process.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2024.818912
Parvathy Pillai, Amina Maamouri, Jonathan Temte
{"title":"Identifying Community-Based Entrustable Professional Activities for Medical Students Through a Modified Delphi Process.","authors":"Parvathy Pillai, Amina Maamouri, Jonathan Temte","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.818912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recognition of the need for medical education to train physicians who are skilled at supporting population health and work beyond traditional health care settings is growing. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for medical students typically have centered around activities taking place in the clinical workplace; however, EPAs that involve working with community members in community contexts have not been clearly established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a three-stage online modified-Delphi method to identify community-based EPAs for University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health medical students. We recruited key stakeholders to participate and asked them, based on their experience, to generate a list of community-based tasks that they believed graduates should be trusted to perform. Subsequently, using a five-point anchored Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree), we asked participants to rate their level of agreement with each identified task becoming an EPA. An a priori definition of consensus was established.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two tasks reached consensus as potential community-based EPAs. The tasks with the highest mean ratings were \"addressing trust issues with the medical community amongst the local population\" (mean=4.71), \"meeting with community members around a health topic\" (mean=4.64), \"identifying opportunities for disease prevention\" (mean=4.64), and \"identifying policies that impact community outcomes\" (mean=4.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The identified community-based tasks can support the augmentation of existing community-based curriculum and help identify areas for novel curriculum and assessment development. Lessons learned from this local effort could be helpful to other programs seeking to establish and refine community-based curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.818912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Recognition of the need for medical education to train physicians who are skilled at supporting population health and work beyond traditional health care settings is growing. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for medical students typically have centered around activities taking place in the clinical workplace; however, EPAs that involve working with community members in community contexts have not been clearly established.

Methods: We used a three-stage online modified-Delphi method to identify community-based EPAs for University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health medical students. We recruited key stakeholders to participate and asked them, based on their experience, to generate a list of community-based tasks that they believed graduates should be trusted to perform. Subsequently, using a five-point anchored Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree), we asked participants to rate their level of agreement with each identified task becoming an EPA. An a priori definition of consensus was established.

Results: Twenty-two tasks reached consensus as potential community-based EPAs. The tasks with the highest mean ratings were "addressing trust issues with the medical community amongst the local population" (mean=4.71), "meeting with community members around a health topic" (mean=4.64), "identifying opportunities for disease prevention" (mean=4.64), and "identifying policies that impact community outcomes" (mean=4.57).

Conclusions: The identified community-based tasks can support the augmentation of existing community-based curriculum and help identify areas for novel curriculum and assessment development. Lessons learned from this local effort could be helpful to other programs seeking to establish and refine community-based curricula.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过改良德尔菲法确定医学生的社区委托专业活动。
背景和目标:越来越多的人认识到,医学教育需要培养能够熟练支持人口健康和在传统医疗机构之外工作的医生。医学生的可委托专业活动(EPAs)通常以临床工作场所的活动为中心;然而,涉及在社区环境中与社区成员合作的 EPAs 尚未明确确立:方法:我们采用了三阶段在线修改德尔菲法来确定威斯康星大学医学与公共卫生学院医学生基于社区的 EPA。我们招募了主要的利益相关者参与其中,并要求他们根据自己的经验,列出一份他们认为毕业生应该被信任执行的社区任务清单。随后,我们使用五点锚定李克特量表(1=非常不同意到 5=非常同意),要求参与者对每项确定的任务成为 EPA 的同意程度进行评分。先验地确定了共识的定义:结果:22 项任务达成共识,有可能成为社区环保行动方案。平均评分最高的任务是 "解决当地居民对医疗界的信任问题"(平均分=4.71)、"与社区成员围绕健康主题举行会议"(平均分=4.64)、"确定疾病预防的机会"(平均分=4.64)和 "确定影响社区成果的政策"(平均分=4.57):已确定的社区任务可支持现有社区课程的扩充,并有助于确定新课程和评估开发的领域。从这项地方性工作中汲取的经验教训可能会对其他寻求建立和完善社区课程的计划有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
期刊最新文献
Authors' Response to "The Growing Divide Between Teaching Empathy and Being Empathetic". The Growing Divide Between Teaching Empathy and Being Empathetic. An Exploratory Study of Published Case Reports Using a Systematic Typology. Supporting International Medical Graduate Workforce Integration in the 2024 US Election. Three Types of Uncertainty: A Qualitative Study of Family Medicine Residents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1