“Effects of cropping sequences and rotational grazing on diversity, biomass, density and body mass of earthworms”

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY European Journal of Soil Biology Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103647
Máximo Alvarez , Andrés Ligrone , Gervasio Piñeiro , Gabriella Jorge-Escudero
{"title":"“Effects of cropping sequences and rotational grazing on diversity, biomass, density and body mass of earthworms”","authors":"Máximo Alvarez ,&nbsp;Andrés Ligrone ,&nbsp;Gervasio Piñeiro ,&nbsp;Gabriella Jorge-Escudero","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earthworms are classified as ecosystem engineers, given their ability to modify resources and habitats for other organisms. However, they are also strongly influenced by the land uses changes. Our study investigated the impact of different agricultural systems (rotational grazing versus continuous grazing ; cropping systems in pasture phase versus crop phase) on earthworm communities (diversity, biomass, density and body mass) in Uruguay, a context that is still poorly documented. We found a total of nine earthworm species. Rotational and continuous grazing systems exhibited similar mean richness (2.67–2.33, respectively), while in the crop phase, the mean richness was 2 points higher than that of the pasture phase (5.67 and 3.67, respectively). The results of the principal component analysis confirmed an overlap between the two grazing systems, rotational and continuous, indicating similarities in earthworm species composition in these systems. On the other hand, the pasture phase showed partial overlap with the grazing systems but the crop phase did not overlap with any of other three land uses. No significant difference was found in biomass in rotational grazing versus continuous grazing and in pasture phase versus crop phase. Earthworm density was significantly higher in rotational grazing compared to continuous grazing and in the crop phase compared to pasture phase. Body mass differences were observed in different land uses or developmental stages, observing in average smaller earthworms in rotational grazing compared to continuous grazing. Co-inertia analysis revealed associations between soil variables and earthworm biomass and body mass. Soil variables, including clay and calcium, strongly correlated with earthworm biomass. This study highlights the complexity of earthworm responses to land use, challenging logical interpretations. Further research is needed to elucidate the nuanced interactions between earthworm communities and environmental variables, providing valuable insights for sustainable land management practices, since both soil and plant health is known to be enhanced by the presence of earthworms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103647"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000530","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthworms are classified as ecosystem engineers, given their ability to modify resources and habitats for other organisms. However, they are also strongly influenced by the land uses changes. Our study investigated the impact of different agricultural systems (rotational grazing versus continuous grazing ; cropping systems in pasture phase versus crop phase) on earthworm communities (diversity, biomass, density and body mass) in Uruguay, a context that is still poorly documented. We found a total of nine earthworm species. Rotational and continuous grazing systems exhibited similar mean richness (2.67–2.33, respectively), while in the crop phase, the mean richness was 2 points higher than that of the pasture phase (5.67 and 3.67, respectively). The results of the principal component analysis confirmed an overlap between the two grazing systems, rotational and continuous, indicating similarities in earthworm species composition in these systems. On the other hand, the pasture phase showed partial overlap with the grazing systems but the crop phase did not overlap with any of other three land uses. No significant difference was found in biomass in rotational grazing versus continuous grazing and in pasture phase versus crop phase. Earthworm density was significantly higher in rotational grazing compared to continuous grazing and in the crop phase compared to pasture phase. Body mass differences were observed in different land uses or developmental stages, observing in average smaller earthworms in rotational grazing compared to continuous grazing. Co-inertia analysis revealed associations between soil variables and earthworm biomass and body mass. Soil variables, including clay and calcium, strongly correlated with earthworm biomass. This study highlights the complexity of earthworm responses to land use, challenging logical interpretations. Further research is needed to elucidate the nuanced interactions between earthworm communities and environmental variables, providing valuable insights for sustainable land management practices, since both soil and plant health is known to be enhanced by the presence of earthworms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"耕作序列和轮牧对蚯蚓多样性、生物量、密度和体重的影响"
蚯蚓被归类为生态系统工程师,因为它们有能力为其他生物改变资源和栖息地。然而,它们也受到土地利用变化的强烈影响。我们的研究调查了乌拉圭不同农业系统(轮牧与连续放牧;牧草期与作物期的耕作系统)对蚯蚓群落(多样性、生物量、密度和体量)的影响,目前这方面的记录还很少。我们共发现了九种蚯蚓。轮牧和连续放牧系统表现出相似的平均丰富度(分别为 2.67-2.33 ),而作物阶段的平均丰富度比牧场阶段高出 2 个点(分别为 5.67 和 3.67)。主成分分析结果证实,轮牧和连作两种放牧系统之间存在重叠,这表明这两种放牧系统中的蚯蚓物种组成具有相似性。另一方面,牧场阶段与放牧系统有部分重叠,但作物阶段与其他三种土地利用方式均无重叠。轮牧与连续放牧以及牧场阶段与作物阶段的生物量没有明显差异。轮牧期的蚯蚓密度明显高于连续放牧期,作物期的蚯蚓密度明显高于牧草期。在不同的土地利用或发育阶段,蚯蚓的体型也存在差异,轮牧阶段的蚯蚓平均体型小于连续放牧阶段的蚯蚓。共惯性分析揭示了土壤变量与蚯蚓生物量和体重之间的关系。包括粘土和钙在内的土壤变量与蚯蚓生物量密切相关。这项研究强调了蚯蚓对土地利用反应的复杂性,对逻辑解释提出了挑战。蚯蚓群落与环境变量之间微妙的相互作用需要进一步的研究来阐明,这为可持续土地管理实践提供了宝贵的见解,因为众所周知,蚯蚓的存在会促进土壤和植物的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
期刊最新文献
In-depth insights into carbohydrate-active enzyme genes regarding the disparities in soil organic carbon after 12-year rotational cropping system field study Nutrient supply enhances positive priming of soil organic C under straw amendment and accelerates the incorporation of straw-derived C into organic C pool in paddy soils Dynamics of nitrogen mineralization and nitrogen cycling functional genes in response to soil pore size distribution Soil microbial resistance and resilience to drought under organic and conventional farming Plantation conversion of Eucalyptus promotes soil microbial necromass C accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1