High or low expectations: Expected intensity of action outcome is embedded in action kinetics

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105887
Batel Buaron , Daniel Reznik , Roy Mukamel
{"title":"High or low expectations: Expected intensity of action outcome is embedded in action kinetics","authors":"Batel Buaron ,&nbsp;Daniel Reznik ,&nbsp;Roy Mukamel","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Goal-directed actions are performed in order to attain certain sensory consequences in the world. However, expected attributes of these consequences can affect the kinetics of the action. In a set of three studies (<em>n</em> = 120), we examined how expected attributes of stimulus outcome (intensity) shape the kinetics of the triggering action (applied force), even when the action kinetic and attribute are independent. We show that during action execution (button presses), the expected intensity of sensory outcome affects the applied force of the stimulus-producing action in an inverse fashion. Thus, participants applied more force when the expected intensity of the outcome was low (vs. high intensity outcome). In the absence of expectations or when actions were performed in response to the sensory event, no intensity-dependent force modulations were found. Thus, expectations of stimulus intensity and causality play an important role in shaping action kinetics. Finally, we examined the relationship between kinetics and perception and found no influence of applied force level on perceptual detection of low intensity (near-threshold) outcome stimuli, suggesting no causal link between the two. Taken together, our results demonstrate that action kinetics are embedded with high-level context such as the expectation of consequence intensity and the causal relationship with environmental cues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 105887"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001732/pdfft?md5=654bdad8283afc095ff3b02e6cbe66cb&pid=1-s2.0-S0010027724001732-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001732","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal-directed actions are performed in order to attain certain sensory consequences in the world. However, expected attributes of these consequences can affect the kinetics of the action. In a set of three studies (n = 120), we examined how expected attributes of stimulus outcome (intensity) shape the kinetics of the triggering action (applied force), even when the action kinetic and attribute are independent. We show that during action execution (button presses), the expected intensity of sensory outcome affects the applied force of the stimulus-producing action in an inverse fashion. Thus, participants applied more force when the expected intensity of the outcome was low (vs. high intensity outcome). In the absence of expectations or when actions were performed in response to the sensory event, no intensity-dependent force modulations were found. Thus, expectations of stimulus intensity and causality play an important role in shaping action kinetics. Finally, we examined the relationship between kinetics and perception and found no influence of applied force level on perceptual detection of low intensity (near-threshold) outcome stimuli, suggesting no causal link between the two. Taken together, our results demonstrate that action kinetics are embedded with high-level context such as the expectation of consequence intensity and the causal relationship with environmental cues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
期望值高或低:行动结果的预期强度包含在行动动力学中
目标导向的行动是为了在世界上获得某些感官结果。然而,这些结果的预期属性会影响行动的动力。在一组三项研究(n = 120)中,我们考察了刺激结果(强度)的预期属性如何影响触发动作(施加的力)的动力学,即使动作动力学和属性是独立的。我们的研究表明,在执行动作(按下按钮)的过程中,感官结果的预期强度会反向影响刺激动作的施力。因此,当预期结果强度较低时(相对于高强度结果),参与者会施加更大的力。在没有预期或对感觉事件做出反应的情况下,没有发现与强度相关的力量调节。因此,对刺激强度的预期和因果关系在形成动作动力学方面起着重要作用。最后,我们研究了动力学与感知之间的关系,发现施力水平对低强度(接近阈值)结果刺激的感知检测没有影响,这表明两者之间没有因果联系。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,动作动量与高层次的情境(如对结果强度的预期)以及与环境线索之间的因果关系息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
The role of exceptions in children's and adults' judgments about generic statements. Partisan language in a polarized world: In-group language provides reputational benefits to speakers while polarizing audiences. What's left of the leftward bias in scene viewing? Lateral asymmetries in information processing during early search guidance. Language enables the acquisition of distinct sensorimotor memories for speech. Morality on the road: Should machine drivers be more utilitarian than human drivers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1