Selling mode choice with logistics service: Reselling or online marketplace?

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101434
Jia Qian , Jiannan Shen , Xiaofeng Shao
{"title":"Selling mode choice with logistics service: Reselling or online marketplace?","authors":"Jia Qian ,&nbsp;Jiannan Shen ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reselling or online marketplace are the two common selling modes for e-tailers in online retailing, and in each selling mode, logistics service is an important strategy that is provided by e-tailers, manufacturers, or third-party logistics (abbreviated as 3PL) companies. We formulate a multi-stage game to sequentially investigate the optimal selling mode and the equilibrium of service format selection and find that under the identical logistics service costs for all service providers, the e-tailer is willing to choose reselling when the fraction of the manufacturer’s revenue sharing as a commission rate is low or choose online marketplace when the fraction is medium–low. When the fraction is medium to high, the selling mode choice is influenced by the fraction and the logistics service’s cost sensitivity to demand, and interestingly the e-tailer does not always choose online marketplace with a high fraction of revenue sharing. Further, we find the logistics service undertaken by the e-tailer is the equilibrium when the e-tailer chooses reselling, or online marketplace with a medium to high fraction, while the manufacturer is the equilibrium when the e-tailer chooses online marketplace with a medium–low fraction. Moreover, we identify the “win–win” conditions by examining the consistency in choosing the selling mode between the e-tailer and the manufacturer. Finally, the e-tailer and manufacturer would outsource the logistics service to a 3PL company with a lower service cost regardless of the selling mode. Last, the optimal selling mode and the consistency are robust under each extended discussion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101434"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reselling or online marketplace are the two common selling modes for e-tailers in online retailing, and in each selling mode, logistics service is an important strategy that is provided by e-tailers, manufacturers, or third-party logistics (abbreviated as 3PL) companies. We formulate a multi-stage game to sequentially investigate the optimal selling mode and the equilibrium of service format selection and find that under the identical logistics service costs for all service providers, the e-tailer is willing to choose reselling when the fraction of the manufacturer’s revenue sharing as a commission rate is low or choose online marketplace when the fraction is medium–low. When the fraction is medium to high, the selling mode choice is influenced by the fraction and the logistics service’s cost sensitivity to demand, and interestingly the e-tailer does not always choose online marketplace with a high fraction of revenue sharing. Further, we find the logistics service undertaken by the e-tailer is the equilibrium when the e-tailer chooses reselling, or online marketplace with a medium to high fraction, while the manufacturer is the equilibrium when the e-tailer chooses online marketplace with a medium–low fraction. Moreover, we identify the “win–win” conditions by examining the consistency in choosing the selling mode between the e-tailer and the manufacturer. Finally, the e-tailer and manufacturer would outsource the logistics service to a 3PL company with a lower service cost regardless of the selling mode. Last, the optimal selling mode and the consistency are robust under each extended discussion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用物流服务选择销售模式:转售还是在线市场?
转售或网上商城是网络零售中网络零售商常见的两种销售模式,而在每种销售模式中,物流服务都是一种重要的策略,由网络零售商、制造商或第三方物流(简称3PL)公司提供。我们提出了一个多阶段博弈,依次考察了最优销售模式和服务形式选择的均衡,发现在所有服务提供商的物流服务成本相同的情况下,当制造商收入分成中的佣金比例较低时,网络零售商愿意选择转售;当该比例为中低时,网络零售商愿意选择网上商城。当分红比例为中高时,销售模式的选择受分红比例和物流服务成本对需求敏感度的影响,有趣的是,网络零售商并不总是选择高分红比例的在线市场。此外,我们还发现,当网络零售商选择转售或中高比例的在线市场时,由网络零售商承担的物流服务是均衡的,而当网络零售商选择中低比例的在线市场时,制造商是均衡的。此外,我们还通过研究网络零售商和制造商在选择销售模式时的一致性来确定 "双赢 "条件。最后,无论采用哪种销售模式,网络零售商和制造商都会将物流服务外包给服务成本较低的第三方物流公司。最后,最佳销售模式和一致性在每次扩展讨论中都是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
Who should provide a trade-in service under the online agency-selling mode? Home is best: Review source and cross-border online shopping Sustaining superior visibility within digital platforms through inside and outside competitive action repertoires The effects of physician’s brand positioning on diagnostic dispensing continuity and cross-provincial healthcare flow: Evidence from an online traditional Chinese medicine community Physical stores versus physical showrooms: Channel structures of online retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1