Conscious sedation for the management of peritonsillar abscess in pediatric patients: A prospective case series and literature review

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112032
{"title":"Conscious sedation for the management of peritonsillar abscess in pediatric patients: A prospective case series and literature review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common pediatric infection requiring drainage. Conscious Sedation (CS) can facilitate drainage in uncooperative children. However, it carries risks, especially if the airway is compromised. Moreover, evidence on its safety and efficacy is limited. This study examined the safety, pain reduction, and anxiety management of hospitalized pediatric patients treated for PTA under CS.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We performed a prospective observational case series of 118 children aged 2–15 years with 155 PTA episodes, managed from 2016 to 2023. Conscious sedation was used in 42 episodes. Outcomes were compared among CS and non-CS (local anesthesia only). Complications assessed safety. Efficacy was evaluated by the amount of pus, hospitalization parameters, pain scores, and recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant differences were found regarding the demographic and presentation parameters except for younger age among the CS group (9 vs 11 years p = 0.001). One minor oxygen desaturation (2 %) event occurred with CS. Abscess drainage amount was greater with CS than non-CS, 4.9±4 mL vs. 3.2±2 mL, respectively (p = 0.03). Hospitalization stays were similar among groups. Maximum pain scores were lower with CS than non-CS, 1.4 ± 2 vs 4.2 ± 3 (p &lt; 0.001); similarly, IV pain medication was used less frequently, 0.9 ± 1 vs. 1.6 ± 3 (p = 0.045), and the need for re-aspiration was less common 14 % vs. 28 % (p = 0.04), with CS than non-CS, respectively. The three-month recurrence rate was numerically lower with CS (5 % vs. 14 % non-CS).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Conscious sedation facilitates PTA drainage with excellent safety and improved efficacy compared to local anesthesia in children. Pain scores are reduced both during drainage and hospitalization. Our prospective data add to the limited evidence supporting CS as a viable option for abscess drainage in uncooperative pediatric patients. Further study is warranted to confirm potential long-term reductions in recurrence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587624001861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common pediatric infection requiring drainage. Conscious Sedation (CS) can facilitate drainage in uncooperative children. However, it carries risks, especially if the airway is compromised. Moreover, evidence on its safety and efficacy is limited. This study examined the safety, pain reduction, and anxiety management of hospitalized pediatric patients treated for PTA under CS.

Materials and methods

We performed a prospective observational case series of 118 children aged 2–15 years with 155 PTA episodes, managed from 2016 to 2023. Conscious sedation was used in 42 episodes. Outcomes were compared among CS and non-CS (local anesthesia only). Complications assessed safety. Efficacy was evaluated by the amount of pus, hospitalization parameters, pain scores, and recurrence.

Results

No significant differences were found regarding the demographic and presentation parameters except for younger age among the CS group (9 vs 11 years p = 0.001). One minor oxygen desaturation (2 %) event occurred with CS. Abscess drainage amount was greater with CS than non-CS, 4.9±4 mL vs. 3.2±2 mL, respectively (p = 0.03). Hospitalization stays were similar among groups. Maximum pain scores were lower with CS than non-CS, 1.4 ± 2 vs 4.2 ± 3 (p < 0.001); similarly, IV pain medication was used less frequently, 0.9 ± 1 vs. 1.6 ± 3 (p = 0.045), and the need for re-aspiration was less common 14 % vs. 28 % (p = 0.04), with CS than non-CS, respectively. The three-month recurrence rate was numerically lower with CS (5 % vs. 14 % non-CS).

Conclusions

Conscious sedation facilitates PTA drainage with excellent safety and improved efficacy compared to local anesthesia in children. Pain scores are reduced both during drainage and hospitalization. Our prospective data add to the limited evidence supporting CS as a viable option for abscess drainage in uncooperative pediatric patients. Further study is warranted to confirm potential long-term reductions in recurrence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用意识镇静剂治疗小儿腹腔周围脓肿:前瞻性病例系列和文献综述
目的:腹腔脓肿(PTA)是一种需要引流的常见儿科感染。意识镇静(CS)可以帮助不合作的儿童进行引流。然而,这种方法也存在风险,尤其是在气道受损的情况下。此外,有关其安全性和有效性的证据也很有限。本研究考察了在 CS 下接受 PTA 治疗的住院儿科患者的安全性、疼痛减轻和焦虑管理情况。材料和方法我们对 2016 年至 2023 年期间接受过 155 次 PTA 治疗的 118 名 2-15 岁儿童进行了前瞻性观察病例系列研究。其中 42 次使用了意识镇静。比较了CS和非CS(仅局部麻醉)的结果。并发症评估了安全性。结果除 CS 组年龄较小(9 岁 vs 11 岁 p = 0.001)外,其他人口统计学参数和表现参数均无显著差异。CS 组出现了一次轻微的氧饱和度降低(2%)。CS 组的脓肿引流量大于非 CS 组,分别为 4.9±4 mL 对 3.2±2 mL(P = 0.03)。各组的住院时间相似。CS 的最大疼痛评分低于非 CS,分别为 1.4±2 vs 4.2±3 (p < 0.001);同样,静脉止痛药的使用频率也低于非 CS,分别为 0.9±1 vs 1.6±3 (p = 0.045),再次抽吸的需求也低于非 CS,分别为 14% vs 28% (p = 0.04)。结论与局部麻醉相比,意识镇静可提高儿童 PTA 引流术的安全性和疗效。引流和住院期间的疼痛评分均有所降低。我们的前瞻性数据补充了有限的证据,支持 CS 作为不合作儿科患者脓肿引流的可行方案。我们还需要进一步研究,以证实 CS 可长期降低复发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
期刊最新文献
The AMSA® manosonic nebulizer for ENT disease among children in Poland Dysphagia is a strong predictor of revision supraglottoplasty in pediatric laryngomalacia Does injection of botulinum toxin to salivary glands require ultrasound guidance? Prevalence of concha bullosa in a pediatric population Holiday letter 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1