Misperceiving Momentum: Computational Mechanisms of Biased Striatal Reward Prediction Errors in Bipolar Disorder

Hestia Moningka , Liam Mason
{"title":"Misperceiving Momentum: Computational Mechanisms of Biased Striatal Reward Prediction Errors in Bipolar Disorder","authors":"Hestia Moningka ,&nbsp;Liam Mason","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Dysregulated reward processing and mood instability are core features of bipolar disorder that have largely been considered separately, with contradictory findings. We sought to test a mechanistic account that emphasizes an excessive tendency in bipolar disorder to enter recursive cycles in which reward perception is biased by signals that the environment may be changing for the better or worse.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants completed a probabilistic reward task with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Using an influential computational model, we ascertained whether participants with bipolar disorder (<em>n</em> = 21) showed greater striatal tracking of momentum-biased reward prediction errors (RPEs) than matched control participants (<em>n</em> = 21). We conducted psychophysiological interaction analyses to quantify the degree to which each group modulated functional connectivity between the ventral striatum and left anterior insula in response to fluctuations in momentum.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In participants with bipolar disorder, but not control participants, the momentum-biased RPE model accounted for significant additional variance in striatal activity beyond a standard model of veridical RPEs. Compared with control participants, participants with bipolar disorder exhibited lower insular-striatal functional connectivity modulated by momentum-biased RPEs, an effect that was more pronounced as a function of current manic symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Consistent with existing theory, we found evidence that bipolar disorder is associated with a tendency for momentum to excessively bias striatal tracking of RPEs. We identified impaired insular-striatal connectivity as a possible locus for this propensity. We argue that computational psychiatric approaches that examine momentary shifts in reward and mood dynamics have strong potential for yielding new mechanistic insights and intervention targets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100330"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324000430/pdfft?md5=fec0e6195a7b2242719484cff2576524&pid=1-s2.0-S2667174324000430-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324000430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dysregulated reward processing and mood instability are core features of bipolar disorder that have largely been considered separately, with contradictory findings. We sought to test a mechanistic account that emphasizes an excessive tendency in bipolar disorder to enter recursive cycles in which reward perception is biased by signals that the environment may be changing for the better or worse.

Methods

Participants completed a probabilistic reward task with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Using an influential computational model, we ascertained whether participants with bipolar disorder (n = 21) showed greater striatal tracking of momentum-biased reward prediction errors (RPEs) than matched control participants (n = 21). We conducted psychophysiological interaction analyses to quantify the degree to which each group modulated functional connectivity between the ventral striatum and left anterior insula in response to fluctuations in momentum.

Results

In participants with bipolar disorder, but not control participants, the momentum-biased RPE model accounted for significant additional variance in striatal activity beyond a standard model of veridical RPEs. Compared with control participants, participants with bipolar disorder exhibited lower insular-striatal functional connectivity modulated by momentum-biased RPEs, an effect that was more pronounced as a function of current manic symptoms.

Conclusions

Consistent with existing theory, we found evidence that bipolar disorder is associated with a tendency for momentum to excessively bias striatal tracking of RPEs. We identified impaired insular-striatal connectivity as a possible locus for this propensity. We argue that computational psychiatric approaches that examine momentary shifts in reward and mood dynamics have strong potential for yielding new mechanistic insights and intervention targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
误解动量:双相情感障碍患者纹状体奖励预测偏差的计算机制
背景奖赏处理失调和情绪不稳定是躁郁症的核心特征,人们大多将其分开考虑,但得出的结论却相互矛盾。我们试图检验一种机理解释,这种解释强调双相情感障碍患者过度倾向于进入递归循环,在这种循环中,奖赏感知会受到环境好坏变化信号的影响。利用一个有影响力的计算模型,我们确定了患有双相情感障碍的参与者(n = 21)是否比匹配的对照组参与者(n = 21)表现出更强的纹状体追踪动量偏倚奖赏预测错误(RPE)的能力。我们进行了心理生理学交互作用分析,以量化各组在多大程度上调节了腹侧纹状体和左侧前脑岛之间的功能连接,从而对动量波动做出反应。结果 在双相情感障碍参与者(而非对照组参与者)中,动量偏倚 RPE 模型在真实 RPE 的标准模型之外解释了纹状体活动的显著额外差异。与对照组参与者相比,双相情感障碍参与者在动量偏倚 RPE 的调节下表现出较低的岛叶-纹状体功能连接性,这种效应在当前躁狂症状的作用下更为明显。结论与现有理论一致,我们发现双相情感障碍与动量过度偏倚纹状体 RPE 跟踪的倾向有关。我们发现岛叶-纹状体连通性受损可能是导致这种倾向的原因之一。我们认为,研究奖赏和情绪动态瞬时变化的计算精神病学方法极有可能产生新的机理认识和干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Page Subscribers Page Guide for Authors In This Issue – November
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1