The relational forms of cultural-creative crowdfunding: A typology of practices through mapping platforms in Europe and Latin America

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101913
Alice Demattos Guimarães , Natalia Maehle , Lluís Bonet
{"title":"The relational forms of cultural-creative crowdfunding: A typology of practices through mapping platforms in Europe and Latin America","authors":"Alice Demattos Guimarães ,&nbsp;Natalia Maehle ,&nbsp;Lluís Bonet","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cultural-creative crowdfunding (CCCF) intersects the culture sector production chain and alternative finance technology as a global web-enabled phenomenon for funding cultural-creative activities. Yet, busking or aspects of patronage are not new to artists and cultural-creative agents; the novelty is doing so through a virtual intermediator space, a crowdfunding platform (CFP). CFPs have proliferated worldwide but the literature is embryonic and lacks further elaboration on how platform dynamics can impact the funding/financing patterns of specific sectors. In the case of the culture sector, given its unique attributes, specificities, and relational structuring, the impact of crowdfunding requires even more conceptual development, systematization, and potential policy instrumentalization. Hence, this study explores how CCCF has evolved and what different models (and channels) within multiple platforms were developed under the CCCF umbrella. Based on a combination of methods (tracking and trawling, Delphi, and categoric analysis), the current research maps the CFPs focusing on culture-creative projects throughout Europe and Latin America. The aim is to conceptualize a broader typology of CCCF practices that can better serve the cultural-creative circuit. This work is among the first to pursue such CCCF typology bridging cross-disciplinary understanding and real-world practices. This research, therefore, offers implications for interdisciplinary academics, practitioners, and policymakers by enabling the nuanced comprehension of the relational forms of CCCF as multiple-practices, expanding its boundaries amid a vaster umbrella of possible web-enabled genre (sub-)models to be adopted, legitimized, and systematized in (and by) the culture sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X24000524/pdfft?md5=dfafcd971377e9f6560f5372b0ec6ff9&pid=1-s2.0-S0304422X24000524-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X24000524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural-creative crowdfunding (CCCF) intersects the culture sector production chain and alternative finance technology as a global web-enabled phenomenon for funding cultural-creative activities. Yet, busking or aspects of patronage are not new to artists and cultural-creative agents; the novelty is doing so through a virtual intermediator space, a crowdfunding platform (CFP). CFPs have proliferated worldwide but the literature is embryonic and lacks further elaboration on how platform dynamics can impact the funding/financing patterns of specific sectors. In the case of the culture sector, given its unique attributes, specificities, and relational structuring, the impact of crowdfunding requires even more conceptual development, systematization, and potential policy instrumentalization. Hence, this study explores how CCCF has evolved and what different models (and channels) within multiple platforms were developed under the CCCF umbrella. Based on a combination of methods (tracking and trawling, Delphi, and categoric analysis), the current research maps the CFPs focusing on culture-creative projects throughout Europe and Latin America. The aim is to conceptualize a broader typology of CCCF practices that can better serve the cultural-creative circuit. This work is among the first to pursue such CCCF typology bridging cross-disciplinary understanding and real-world practices. This research, therefore, offers implications for interdisciplinary academics, practitioners, and policymakers by enabling the nuanced comprehension of the relational forms of CCCF as multiple-practices, expanding its boundaries amid a vaster umbrella of possible web-enabled genre (sub-)models to be adopted, legitimized, and systematized in (and by) the culture sector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化创意众筹的关系形式:通过绘制欧洲和拉丁美洲的平台图对实践进行分类
文化创意众筹(CCCF)将文化部门的生产链与另类金融技术交织在一起,成为一种资助文化创意活动的全球网络现象。然而,对于艺术家和文化创意机构来说,摆摊或赞助并不是什么新鲜事,新颖之处在于通过一个虚拟的中介空间--众筹平台(CFP)--来实现这一点。众筹平台已在全球范围内激增,但相关文献尚处于萌芽阶段,缺乏对平台动态如何影响特定领域资金/融资模式的进一步阐述。就文化领域而言,鉴于其独特的属性、特殊性和关系结构,众筹的影响需要更多的概念发展、系统化和潜在的政策工具化。因此,本研究探讨了 CCCF 是如何演变的,以及在 CCCF 的保护伞下,在多个平台中开发了哪些不同的模式(和渠道)。基于多种方法(跟踪和拖网法、德尔菲法和分类分析法)的结合,本研究绘制了以欧洲和拉丁美洲文化创意项目为重点的CFP地图。研究的目的是为文化创意基金的实践建立一个更广泛的类型概念,从而更好地服务于文化创意产业。这项工作是首批将跨学科理解与现实世界实践相结合的 CCCF 类型研究之一。因此,这项研究为跨学科学者、从业人员和政策制定者提供了启示,使他们能够细致入微地理解作为多重实践的 CCCF 的关系形式,在文化领域(以及由文化领域)采用、合法化和系统化的网络支持的可能类型(子)模式的更大范围内扩展其边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
The problem of socio-territorial inequality in cultural policies: Unveiling policy frames through Barcelona policies (2019–2023) Reconfiguring “Heritage hip-hop” From the scenes: Rightful youth rebellion and localised authenticity in the Huxiang Flow The role of hope and fear in the impact of climate fiction on climate action intentions: Evidence from India and USA Divergences and convergences across European musical preferences: How taste varies within and between countries Designed for success or failure: Differences in funding and rejection in the space of applications to the Danish Art Foundation among craftsmen and designers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1