Sparking creativity: Encouraging creative idea generation through automatically generated word recommendations.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02463-8
Talia A Wise, Yoed N Kenett
{"title":"Sparking creativity: Encouraging creative idea generation through automatically generated word recommendations.","authors":"Talia A Wise, Yoed N Kenett","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02463-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Creative block is a familiar foe to any who attempt to create and is especially related to \"writers block\". While significant effort has been focused on developing methods to break such blocks, it remains an active challenge. Here, we focus on the role of semantic memory structure in driving creative block, by having people get \"stuck\" in a certain part of their semantic memory network. We directly examine whether we can \"pull out\" a participant from where they got \"stuck\" in their semantic memory, breaking their creative impasse. Our Associative Creativity Sparker (ACS) is a cognitive network science-based online tool that aims to spark creative ideas and break creative impasse: Once a participant runs out of ideas in a creative idea generation task, word recommendations are suggested to prime new ideas. These word recommendations are either towards or away from previous ideas, as well as close or far from the target object, based on a conceptual space extracted from the participants responses using online text analysis. In Study 1, 121 participants use the ACS to generate creative alternative uses for five different objects and completed creativity and Gf tasks. In Study 2, we repeat the design of Study 1, but further examine the impact of writing experience on the ACS, by examining 120 novice and 120 experienced writers. Across both studies, our results indicate that the location of word recommendations affects the fluency and originality of one's ideas, and that novice and experienced writers differently benefit from these word recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02463-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creative block is a familiar foe to any who attempt to create and is especially related to "writers block". While significant effort has been focused on developing methods to break such blocks, it remains an active challenge. Here, we focus on the role of semantic memory structure in driving creative block, by having people get "stuck" in a certain part of their semantic memory network. We directly examine whether we can "pull out" a participant from where they got "stuck" in their semantic memory, breaking their creative impasse. Our Associative Creativity Sparker (ACS) is a cognitive network science-based online tool that aims to spark creative ideas and break creative impasse: Once a participant runs out of ideas in a creative idea generation task, word recommendations are suggested to prime new ideas. These word recommendations are either towards or away from previous ideas, as well as close or far from the target object, based on a conceptual space extracted from the participants responses using online text analysis. In Study 1, 121 participants use the ACS to generate creative alternative uses for five different objects and completed creativity and Gf tasks. In Study 2, we repeat the design of Study 1, but further examine the impact of writing experience on the ACS, by examining 120 novice and 120 experienced writers. Across both studies, our results indicate that the location of word recommendations affects the fluency and originality of one's ideas, and that novice and experienced writers differently benefit from these word recommendations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激发创造力:通过自动生成的单词推荐鼓励创意的产生。
对于任何尝试创作的人来说,创作障碍都是一个熟悉的敌人,尤其与 "作家障碍 "有关。虽然人们一直在努力开发打破这种障碍的方法,但它仍然是一项严峻的挑战。在这里,我们通过让人们 "卡 "在语义记忆网络的某个部分,重点研究语义记忆结构在推动创作障碍方面的作用。我们直接研究能否将受试者从其语义记忆 "卡住 "的地方 "拉出来",从而打破他们的创意僵局。我们的联想创造力激发器(ACS)是一种基于认知网络科学的在线工具,旨在激发创造性想法,打破创造性僵局:一旦受试者在创意生成任务中耗尽了创意,系统就会为其推荐词语,以激发新的创意。这些推荐词或与之前的创意相近或相远,或与目标对象相近或相远,都是基于使用在线文本分析从参与者的回答中提取的概念空间。在研究 1 中,121 名参与者使用 ACS 为五种不同的物品生成了创意替代用途,并完成了创意和 Gf 任务。在研究 2 中,我们重复了研究 1 的设计,但通过对 120 名写作新手和 120 名写作老手的研究,进一步考察了写作经验对 ACS 的影响。在这两项研究中,我们的结果表明,词语推荐的位置会影响一个人想法的流畅性和独创性,而且新手和经验丰富的写作者会从这些词语推荐中获得不同的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Publisher Correction: Dimensionality and optimal combination of autonomic fear-conditioning measures in humans. Author Correction: Discovering trends of social interaction behavior over time: An introduction to relational event modeling. Author Correction: r2mlm: An R package calculating R-squared measures for multilevel models. Correction: Development and validation of the Emotional Climate Change Stories (ECCS) stimuli set. Geofencing in location-based behavioral research: Methodology, challenges, and implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1