Classification of Suicide Attempt Risk Using Environmental and Lifestyle Factors in 3 Large Youth Cohorts.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY JAMA Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1887
Elina Visoki, Tyler M Moore, Xinhe Zhang, Kate T Tran, Christina Ly, Martinš M Gatavinš, Grace E DiDomenico, Leah Brogan, Joel A Fein, Varun Warrier, Sinan Guloksuz, Ran Barzilay
{"title":"Classification of Suicide Attempt Risk Using Environmental and Lifestyle Factors in 3 Large Youth Cohorts.","authors":"Elina Visoki, Tyler M Moore, Xinhe Zhang, Kate T Tran, Christina Ly, Martinš M Gatavinš, Grace E DiDomenico, Leah Brogan, Joel A Fein, Varun Warrier, Sinan Guloksuz, Ran Barzilay","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Suicide is the third-leading cause of death among US adolescents. Environmental and lifestyle factors influence suicidal behavior and can inform risk classification, yet quantifying and incorporating them in risk assessment presents a significant challenge for reproducibility and clinical translation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the aggregate contribution of environmental and lifestyle factors to youth suicide attempt risk classification.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a cohort study in 3 youth samples: 2 national longitudinal cohorts from the US and the UK and 1 clinical cohort from a tertiary pediatric US hospital. An exposome-wide association study (ExWAS) approach was used to identify risk and protective factors and compute aggregate exposomic scores. Logistic regression models were applied to test associations and model fit of exposomic scores with suicide attempts in independent data. Youth from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia emergency department (CHOP-ED) were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>A single-weighted exposomic score that sums significant risk and protective environmental/lifestyle factors.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>Self-reported suicide attempt.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 364 youth were included in this analysis: 11 564 from the ABCD study (3 waves of assessment; mean [SD] age, 12.0 [0.7] years; 6034 male [52.2%]; 344 attempted suicide [3.0%]; 1154 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the ABCD study), 9000 from the MCS cohort (mean [SD] age, 17.2 [0.3] years; 4593 female [51.0%]; 661 attempted suicide [7.3%]; 2864 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the MCS cohort), and 19 800 from the CHOP-ED cohort (mean [SD] age, 15.3 [1.5] years; 12 937 female [65.3%]; 2051 attempted suicide [10.4%]; 36 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the CHOP-ED cohort). In the ABCD discovery subsample, ExWAS identified 99 risk and protective exposures significantly associated with suicide attempt. A single weighted exposomic score that sums significant risk and protective exposures was associated with suicide attempt in an independent ABCD testing subsample (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 2.0-2.6; P < .001) and explained 17.6% of the variance (based on regression pseudo-R2) in suicide attempt over and above that explained by age, sex, race, and ethnicity (2.8%) and by family history of suicide (6.3%). Findings were consistent in the MCS and CHOP-ED cohorts (explaining 22.6% and 19.3% of the variance in suicide attempt, respectively) despite clinical, demographic, and exposure differences. In all cohorts, compared with youth at the median quintile of the exposomic score, youth at the top fifth quintile were substantially more likely to have made a suicide attempt (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.6-7.2 in the ABCD study; OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.7-5.3 in the MCS cohort; OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 4.7-7.1 in the CHOP-ED cohort).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results suggest that exposomic scores of suicide attempt provided a generalizable method for risk classification that can be applied in diverse samples from clinical or population settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1020-1029"},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1887","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Suicide is the third-leading cause of death among US adolescents. Environmental and lifestyle factors influence suicidal behavior and can inform risk classification, yet quantifying and incorporating them in risk assessment presents a significant challenge for reproducibility and clinical translation.

Objective: To quantify the aggregate contribution of environmental and lifestyle factors to youth suicide attempt risk classification.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a cohort study in 3 youth samples: 2 national longitudinal cohorts from the US and the UK and 1 clinical cohort from a tertiary pediatric US hospital. An exposome-wide association study (ExWAS) approach was used to identify risk and protective factors and compute aggregate exposomic scores. Logistic regression models were applied to test associations and model fit of exposomic scores with suicide attempts in independent data. Youth from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, the UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia emergency department (CHOP-ED) were included in the study.

Exposures: A single-weighted exposomic score that sums significant risk and protective environmental/lifestyle factors.

Main outcome and measure: Self-reported suicide attempt.

Results: A total of 40 364 youth were included in this analysis: 11 564 from the ABCD study (3 waves of assessment; mean [SD] age, 12.0 [0.7] years; 6034 male [52.2%]; 344 attempted suicide [3.0%]; 1154 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the ABCD study), 9000 from the MCS cohort (mean [SD] age, 17.2 [0.3] years; 4593 female [51.0%]; 661 attempted suicide [7.3%]; 2864 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the MCS cohort), and 19 800 from the CHOP-ED cohort (mean [SD] age, 15.3 [1.5] years; 12 937 female [65.3%]; 2051 attempted suicide [10.4%]; 36 environmental/lifestyle factors were included in the CHOP-ED cohort). In the ABCD discovery subsample, ExWAS identified 99 risk and protective exposures significantly associated with suicide attempt. A single weighted exposomic score that sums significant risk and protective exposures was associated with suicide attempt in an independent ABCD testing subsample (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 2.0-2.6; P < .001) and explained 17.6% of the variance (based on regression pseudo-R2) in suicide attempt over and above that explained by age, sex, race, and ethnicity (2.8%) and by family history of suicide (6.3%). Findings were consistent in the MCS and CHOP-ED cohorts (explaining 22.6% and 19.3% of the variance in suicide attempt, respectively) despite clinical, demographic, and exposure differences. In all cohorts, compared with youth at the median quintile of the exposomic score, youth at the top fifth quintile were substantially more likely to have made a suicide attempt (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.6-7.2 in the ABCD study; OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.7-5.3 in the MCS cohort; OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 4.7-7.1 in the CHOP-ED cohort).

Conclusions and relevance: Results suggest that exposomic scores of suicide attempt provided a generalizable method for risk classification that can be applied in diverse samples from clinical or population settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用环境和生活方式因素对 3 个大型青少年群体的自杀未遂风险进行分类。
重要性:自杀是导致美国青少年死亡的第三大原因。环境和生活方式因素会影响自杀行为,并能为风险分类提供信息,但将这些因素量化并纳入风险评估对可重复性和临床转化提出了巨大挑战:量化环境和生活方式因素对青少年自杀未遂风险分类的总体贡献:这是一项针对 3 个青少年样本的队列研究:设计:这是一项针对 3 个青少年样本的队列研究:2 个来自美国和英国的全国纵向队列,1 个来自美国一家三级儿科医院的临床队列。研究采用了全暴露体关联研究(ExWAS)的方法来识别风险和保护因素,并计算暴露体总分。在独立数据中,采用逻辑回归模型来检验暴露组得分与自杀企图的关联性和模型拟合度。研究对象包括来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究、英国千年队列研究(MCS)和费城儿童医院急诊科(CHOP-ED)的青少年:主要结果和测量:自我报告的自杀未遂:本分析共纳入40 364名青少年:11 564名来自ABCD研究(3波评估;平均[SD]年龄,12.0[0.7]岁;6034名男性[52.2%];344名自杀未遂者[3.0%];1154个环境/生活方式因素被纳入ABCD研究),9000名来自MCS队列(平均[SD]年龄,17.2[0.3]岁;4593 名女性[51.0%];661 名企图自杀者[7.3%];2864 名环境/生活方式因素被纳入 MCS 队列);19800 名来自 CHOP-ED 队列(平均 [SD] 年龄,15.3 [1.5] 岁;12937 名女性[65.3%];2051 名企图自杀者[10.4%];36 名环境/生活方式因素被纳入 CHOP-ED 队列)。在 ABCD 发现子样本中,ExWAS 确定了 99 项与自杀未遂有显著相关性的风险和保护暴露。在一个独立的 ABCD 检测子样本中,将重要的风险暴露和保护暴露相加的单一加权暴露组学评分与自杀未遂相关(几率比 [OR],2.2;95% CI,2.0-2.6;P 结论和相关性:结果表明,自杀未遂的暴露组学评分提供了一种可通用的风险分类方法,可应用于临床或人口环境中的不同样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Ending Unequal Treatment for People With Behavioral Health Conditions. Error in Results and Figure. War Exposure and DNA Methylation in Syrian Refugee Children and Adolescents. Repurposing Semaglutide and Liraglutide for Alcohol Use Disorder Synaptic Density in Early Stages of Psychosis and Clinical High Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1