Forecasters, emergency managers, and residents: Building better risk communication.

Q3 Medicine Journal of Emergency Management Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.5055/jem.0745
Zebulon C Wallace
{"title":"Forecasters, emergency managers, and residents: Building better risk communication.","authors":"Zebulon C Wallace","doi":"10.5055/jem.0745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US National Weather Service (NWS) and emergency managers (EMs) around the country are tasked with communicating severe weather information to the public. Frequent interaction between professionals and residents is essential to building effective partnerships. This paper investigates these interactions and also explores the perspectives of NWS forecasters, EMs, and rural residents related to the efficacy of warning communication, message understanding, preferred platforms, and engagement in protective actions. Data for this study were collected through three original survey instruments that were directed to NWS forecasters and EMs across the country, and residents in four rural communities. Findings reveal that residents generally understand warning messages and generally feel tornado risk communication is effective in their communities. However, residents do not appear to have a plan of action formulated prior to a warning and are, therefore, making, rather than implementing, a plan when warning is issued. This study gives rural residents a voice in the warning communication process and a chance for forecasters and EMs to gain valuable information as they better plan to serve these communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"22 3","pages":"235-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The US National Weather Service (NWS) and emergency managers (EMs) around the country are tasked with communicating severe weather information to the public. Frequent interaction between professionals and residents is essential to building effective partnerships. This paper investigates these interactions and also explores the perspectives of NWS forecasters, EMs, and rural residents related to the efficacy of warning communication, message understanding, preferred platforms, and engagement in protective actions. Data for this study were collected through three original survey instruments that were directed to NWS forecasters and EMs across the country, and residents in four rural communities. Findings reveal that residents generally understand warning messages and generally feel tornado risk communication is effective in their communities. However, residents do not appear to have a plan of action formulated prior to a warning and are, therefore, making, rather than implementing, a plan when warning is issued. This study gives rural residents a voice in the warning communication process and a chance for forecasters and EMs to gain valuable information as they better plan to serve these communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预报员、应急管理人员和居民:建立更好的风险沟通。
美国国家气象局 (NWS) 和全国各地的应急管理人员 (EM) 的任务是向公众传达恶劣天气信息。专业人员与居民之间的频繁互动对于建立有效的伙伴关系至关重要。本文对这些互动进行了调查,同时还探讨了国家气象局预报员、应急管理人员和农村居民对预警沟通的有效性、信息理解、首选平台和参与保护行动的看法。本研究的数据是通过三种原始调查工具收集的,调查对象包括全国各地的国家气象局预报员和监测员以及四个农村社区的居民。调查结果显示,居民一般都能理解预警信息,并普遍认为龙卷风风险交流在他们的社区是有效的。但是,居民似乎并没有在预警前制定行动计划,因此在预警发布时,他们只是制定而不是实施计划。这项研究让农村居民在预警传播过程中有了发言权,也让预报员和应急人员有机会获得有价值的信息,从而更好地为这些社区服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
United front: Emergency management managers, public health, and infection prevention. What's next for the disaster profession? A study of the opinions of local and state emergency managers and their recommendations for a more resilient future. A case study of university mass casualty simulation with high school deaf students who sign. A qualitative analysis of the effects of the COVID-19 response on low-income residents in Cameron County, Texas: Lessons for future pandemic response. Beirut 2020 explosion and health system response: An alarm for the dangerous consequences of Natech incidents in industrial cities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1