Negative urgency as a state-level process.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12961
Kevin M King, Madison C Feil, Nancy Gomez Juarez, Diego Moss, Max A Halvorson, Jonas Dora, Natalie F Upton, Morgan A Bryson, Katherine Seldin, Yuichi Shoda, Christine M Lee, Gregory T Smith
{"title":"Negative urgency as a state-level process.","authors":"Kevin M King, Madison C Feil, Nancy Gomez Juarez, Diego Moss, Max A Halvorson, Jonas Dora, Natalie F Upton, Morgan A Bryson, Katherine Seldin, Yuichi Shoda, Christine M Lee, Gregory T Smith","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Test whether global self-reports of urgency moderated the within-person associations of affect and impulsive behaviors.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Negative urgency is a personality trait that is a risk factor for a range of psychopathology. Although it is assumed that global self-reports of urgency measure individual tendencies to act more impulsively in the face of negative emotions, evidence from ecological momentary assessment studies is mixed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this Registered Report, we used ecological momentary assessment data from a large sample of young adults (n = 496, age 18-22, 5 surveys per day for 40 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All forms of momentary impulsivity were impaired in moments when people reported more intense negative emotions, but global self-reports of urgency did not explain individual differences in this association. Moreover, averaged affective states, rather than specific dimensions, affective circumplex, or appraisals, best predicted impulsive states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that face-valid interpretations of global self-report of urgency are inaccurate, and it may be important to understand how some people come to understand themselves as high on urgency rather than assuming that people's self-reports of their motivations are accurate. Momentary experiences of emotions globally impact multiple weakly to moderately associated impulsive behaviors, and future research should seek to understand both when and for whom these associations are strongest.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12961","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Test whether global self-reports of urgency moderated the within-person associations of affect and impulsive behaviors.

Background: Negative urgency is a personality trait that is a risk factor for a range of psychopathology. Although it is assumed that global self-reports of urgency measure individual tendencies to act more impulsively in the face of negative emotions, evidence from ecological momentary assessment studies is mixed.

Method: In this Registered Report, we used ecological momentary assessment data from a large sample of young adults (n = 496, age 18-22, 5 surveys per day for 40 days).

Results: All forms of momentary impulsivity were impaired in moments when people reported more intense negative emotions, but global self-reports of urgency did not explain individual differences in this association. Moreover, averaged affective states, rather than specific dimensions, affective circumplex, or appraisals, best predicted impulsive states.

Conclusions: Results suggest that face-valid interpretations of global self-report of urgency are inaccurate, and it may be important to understand how some people come to understand themselves as high on urgency rather than assuming that people's self-reports of their motivations are accurate. Momentary experiences of emotions globally impact multiple weakly to moderately associated impulsive behaviors, and future research should seek to understand both when and for whom these associations are strongest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为国家级进程的 "消极紧迫性"。
目的: 测试全球紧迫感自我报告是否会调节人与人之间的情感和冲动行为:测试紧迫感的总体自我报告是否会调节情感和冲动行为的人际关联:背景:负性紧迫感是一种人格特质,是一系列精神病理学的风险因素。尽管人们认为紧迫感的总体自我报告可以衡量个人在面对负面情绪时的冲动倾向,但来自生态瞬间评估研究的证据却不尽相同:在这份注册报告中,我们使用了大量青少年样本(n = 496,18-22 岁,每天 5 次调查,持续 40 天)的生态瞬间评估数据:结果:当人们报告的负面情绪更强烈时,所有形式的瞬间冲动都会受到影响,但对紧迫性的整体自我报告并不能解释这种关联中的个体差异。此外,平均的情绪状态,而不是特定的维度、情绪包络或评价,最能预测冲动状态:结论:研究结果表明,从表面验证的角度来解释全球自我报告的紧迫性是不准确的,因此,重要的是要了解一些人是如何将自己理解为高紧迫性的,而不是假设人们对其动机的自我报告是准确的。情绪的瞬间体验会对多种弱到中度相关的冲动行为产生全面影响,未来的研究应设法了解这些关联在何时以及对谁的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Measures of Subclinical Psychopathy and Everyday Sadism are Still Redundant: A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Blötner and Mokros (2023). The (Un)Attractiveness of Dark Triad Personalities: Assessing Fictitious Characters for Short- and Long-Term Relationships. Understanding Parenting Stress in Adoptive Parents: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study of Parents' Self-Criticism, Child Negative Emotionality, and Child Age at Placement. Personality and Meat Consumption Among Romantic Partners in Daily Life Development of Self‐Reported Reward Responsiveness and Inhibitory Control and the Role of Clinical and Neural Predictors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1