An exploratory examination of delay discounting in women and girls diagnosed with an eating disorder.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1080/10640266.2024.2379125
Marissa L Donahue, Mariah E Willis-Moore, Julie M Petersen, Amy L Odum, Michael E Levin, Josephine N Hannah, Tera Lensegrav-Benson, Benita Quakenbush, Michael P Twohig
{"title":"An exploratory examination of delay discounting in women and girls diagnosed with an eating disorder.","authors":"Marissa L Donahue, Mariah E Willis-Moore, Julie M Petersen, Amy L Odum, Michael E Levin, Josephine N Hannah, Tera Lensegrav-Benson, Benita Quakenbush, Michael P Twohig","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2024.2379125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Those with eating disorders (EDs) characterized by purging behaviors tend to show more impulsivity than those diagnosed with restrictive eating, who tend to show more compulsivity. Impulsive choice (i.e. a type of impulsivity) is a common factor among eating disorders that is less understood. Delay discounting is a measure of choice impulsivity, examining the decrease in value of delayed outcomes. In this exploratory study, we examined associations between eating disorder type, age and delay discounting among patients at a residential ED treatment center (<i>N</i> = 178). Our findings showed that those diagnosed with bulimia nervosa had higher delay discounting (i.e. more impulsivity) at intake compared to anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and other eating types but there were no significant differences. Those diagnosed with bulimia nervosa, as well as those with ARFID and unspecified ED showed a preference for delayed rewards at discharge, but there were no significant differences among ED types. Moderation analyses showed that age, ED type, nor the interaction did not significantly predict delay discounting at intake or discharge. To conclude, those with bulimia nervosa demonstrate less impulsive choice at discharge from a residential ED treatment center. However, additional research is needed given the variability of sample sizes in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2024.2379125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Those with eating disorders (EDs) characterized by purging behaviors tend to show more impulsivity than those diagnosed with restrictive eating, who tend to show more compulsivity. Impulsive choice (i.e. a type of impulsivity) is a common factor among eating disorders that is less understood. Delay discounting is a measure of choice impulsivity, examining the decrease in value of delayed outcomes. In this exploratory study, we examined associations between eating disorder type, age and delay discounting among patients at a residential ED treatment center (N = 178). Our findings showed that those diagnosed with bulimia nervosa had higher delay discounting (i.e. more impulsivity) at intake compared to anorexia nervosa, binge eating disorder, and other eating types but there were no significant differences. Those diagnosed with bulimia nervosa, as well as those with ARFID and unspecified ED showed a preference for delayed rewards at discharge, but there were no significant differences among ED types. Moderation analyses showed that age, ED type, nor the interaction did not significantly predict delay discounting at intake or discharge. To conclude, those with bulimia nervosa demonstrate less impulsive choice at discharge from a residential ED treatment center. However, additional research is needed given the variability of sample sizes in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对被诊断患有饮食失调症的妇女和女孩的延迟折扣进行探索性研究。
以清除行为为特征的进食障碍(ED)患者往往比被诊断为限制性进食的患者表现出更多的冲动性,后者往往表现出更多的强迫性。冲动性选择(即冲动的一种)是饮食失调症中的一个常见因素,但人们对它的了解较少。延迟折现是一种衡量选择冲动性的方法,它考察的是延迟结果价值的降低。在这项探索性研究中,我们研究了饮食失调类型、年龄和延迟折现之间的关系,研究对象是一家ED住院治疗中心的患者(178人)。我们的研究结果表明,与神经性厌食症、暴饮暴食症和其他进食类型的患者相比,被诊断为神经性贪食症的患者在摄入时有更高的延迟折现(即更冲动),但没有显著差异。被诊断为神经性贪食症的患者以及患有 ARFID 和不明 ED 的患者在出院时表现出对延迟奖励的偏好,但不同 ED 类型之间没有显著差异。调节分析表明,年龄、ED 类型或交互作用对摄入或排出时的延迟折现没有显著的预测作用。总之,患有神经性贪食症的人在从住院式 ED 治疗中心出院时会表现出较少的冲动性选择。不过,鉴于本研究的样本量存在差异,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
期刊最新文献
Peer mentors' experiences of delivering peer support for individuals with eating disorders: giving back and supporting processes of change. Absolute and relative outcomes of cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders in adults: a meta-analysis. Differential effects of community involvement on eating disorder prevention outcomes in sexual minority men. Developing a justice-focused body image program for U.S. middle schoolers: a school-based community-engaged research process. The need for more inclusive measurement to advance equity in eating disorders prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1