The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA): An Iterative Approach to Optimize Residents Performance in the American Board of Surgery in-Training Exam (ABSITE)

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Surgical Education Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.022
{"title":"The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA): An Iterative Approach to Optimize Residents Performance in the American Board of Surgery in-Training Exam (ABSITE)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ITE), or ABSITE, preparation requires an effective study approach. In 2014, the ABS announced the alignment of ABSITE to the SCORE® Curriculum. We hypothesized that implementing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach would help surgery residents improve their performance on the ABSITE.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Over 20 years, in a single institution, residents’ ABSITE performance was evaluated over 3 timeframes: Time A (2004-2013), no specific curriculum; Time B (2014-2019), an annual comprehensive ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based multiple-choice exam (MCQ) was administered; and Time C (2020-2023), like Time B with the addition of the PDSA approach for those with less than 60% correct on the ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam. At the beginning of the academic year, in July, all residents are encouraged to (1) initiate a study plan for the upcoming ABSITE using SCORE® guided by the published ABSITE outlines content topics (Plan), (2) take an ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam in October (Do), (3) assess the results/scores (Study), and (4) identify appropriate next steps (Act). Correlational analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ABSITE scores and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time B and Time C. The primary outcome was the change in the proportions of ABSITE scores &lt;30<sup>th</sup> percentile.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 294 ABSITE scores of 94 residents (34 females and 60 males) were analyzed. We found stronger correlation between the correct percentage on ABSITE and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time C (<em>r</em> = 0.73, p &lt; 0.0001) compared to Time B (0.62, p &lt; 0.0001). The percentage of residents with ABSITE scores lower than 30<sup>th</sup> percentile dropped significantly from 14.0% to 3.7% (p = 0.016).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Implementing the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach using the SCORE® curriculum significantly enhances residents’ performance on the ABSITE exam. Surgery residents are encouraged to use this approach and to utilize the SCORE-contents outlined by the ABS in their study plan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424002940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ITE), or ABSITE, preparation requires an effective study approach. In 2014, the ABS announced the alignment of ABSITE to the SCORE® Curriculum. We hypothesized that implementing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach would help surgery residents improve their performance on the ABSITE.

Method

Over 20 years, in a single institution, residents’ ABSITE performance was evaluated over 3 timeframes: Time A (2004-2013), no specific curriculum; Time B (2014-2019), an annual comprehensive ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based multiple-choice exam (MCQ) was administered; and Time C (2020-2023), like Time B with the addition of the PDSA approach for those with less than 60% correct on the ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam. At the beginning of the academic year, in July, all residents are encouraged to (1) initiate a study plan for the upcoming ABSITE using SCORE® guided by the published ABSITE outlines content topics (Plan), (2) take an ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam in October (Do), (3) assess the results/scores (Study), and (4) identify appropriate next steps (Act). Correlational analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ABSITE scores and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time B and Time C. The primary outcome was the change in the proportions of ABSITE scores <30th percentile.

Results

A total of 294 ABSITE scores of 94 residents (34 females and 60 males) were analyzed. We found stronger correlation between the correct percentage on ABSITE and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time C (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001) compared to Time B (0.62, p < 0.0001). The percentage of residents with ABSITE scores lower than 30th percentile dropped significantly from 14.0% to 3.7% (p = 0.016).

Conclusion

Implementing the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach using the SCORE® curriculum significantly enhances residents’ performance on the ABSITE exam. Surgery residents are encouraged to use this approach and to utilize the SCORE-contents outlined by the ABS in their study plan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划-实施-学习-行动 (PDSA):优化住院医师在美国外科培训考试(ABSITE)中表现的迭代方法。
简介:美国外科学委员会 (ABS) 培训中考试 (ITE) 或 ABSITE 的准备工作需要有效的学习方法。2014 年,美国外科学委员会宣布将 ABSITE 与 SCORE® 课程相统一。我们假设,实施 "计划-实施-学习-行动"(PDSA)方法将有助于外科住院医生提高他们在 ABSITE 考试中的成绩:方法:在 20 年的时间里,我们在一家医疗机构对住院医师的 ABSITE 成绩进行了 3 个时间段的评估:时间 A(2004-2013 年),无特定课程;时间 B(2014-2019 年),每年进行一次基于 ABSITE 模拟 SCORE® 的多选题综合考试 (MCQ);时间 C(2020-2023 年),与时间 B 类似,但针对 ABSITE 模拟 SCORE® 考试正确率低于 60% 的学员增加了 PDSA 方法。学年开始时,鼓励所有住院医师:(1) 在已发布的 ABSITE 大纲内容主题的指导下,使用 SCORE® 为即将到来的 ABSITE 制定学习计划 (计划);(2) 在 10 月份参加 ABSITE 模拟 SCORE® 考试 (做);(3) 评估结果/分数 (学习);(4) 确定适当的下一步 (行动)。主要结果是 ABSITE 分数百分位数比例的变化:结果:共分析了 94 名住院医师(34 名女性和 60 名男性)的 294 个 ABSITE 分数。我们发现,与时间 B(0.62,p < 0.0001)相比,时间 C(r = 0.73,p < 0.0001)的 ABSITE 正确率与 ABSITE 模拟的基于 SCORE® 的考试分数之间的相关性更强。ABSITE 分数低于第 30 百分位数的住院医师比例从 14.0% 显著降至 3.7% (p = 0.016):结论:使用 SCORE® 课程实施 "计划-实施-学习-行动"(PDSA)方法可显著提高住院医师在 ABSITE 考试中的成绩。我们鼓励外科住院医师采用这种方法,并在学习计划中使用 ABS 概述的 SCORE 内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
期刊最新文献
Resident-Applicant Buddy Program Increases Applicant Interest and Program Transparency Promoting Surgical Resident Well-being Through Therapist-Facilitated Discussion Groups: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Geographic Match Location Patterns: Comparison of Pre and Post Virtual Interviews General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day Implementation and Evaluation of an Academic Development Rotation for Surgery Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1