Journal of Surgical Education最新文献

OBJECTIVE

DESIGN

SETTING

Participants

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Results

Conclusion

OBJECTIVE

DESIGN

SETTING

PARTICIPANTS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

OBJECTIVE

DESIGN

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

INTRODUCTION

Disparity in healthcare is an important and timely topic. One example of such disparity appears to be the disproportionate use of lighter skin tone illustrations in medical and surgical educational material.¹ Visual representation of pathology in instructional material is one key element that informs decision making in surgical disease and could contribute to disparity in outcomes in underrepresented tonal groups. Our hypothesis is that visual examples (illustrations) of clinical pathology in major surgical texts are biased in that they are heavily weighted to Caucasian skin tones and therefore fail to accurately represent the racial distribution of patients in the United States population.

METHODS

Images from 4 commonly used general surgery textbooks were screened independently by 2 reviewers from Maimonides Medical Center and SUNY (State University of New York) Downstate College of Medicine. Human photographic and cartoon images (where skin tone could be determined), with adequate skin shown, were included. These images were assigned a Fitzpatrick skin photo type (FP) score (1-6). The distribution of images among the 6 FP categories were compared to the expected distribution of images in the United States population, as described from a previous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Differences in distribution were compared using a chi-squared test, with p-value <0.05 considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 556 total images deemed adequate for assessment from the 4 textbooks chosen. 169 from Sabiston, 61 from Mulholland and Greenfield, 177 from Schwartz, and 149 from ACS. About 539 of these images (96.9%) were depictions of patients with light skin tone (FP scores 1-3.) while less than 4% of images were of dark-skinned individuals (FP score between 4 and 6.) An FP score 1 accounted for most images, comprising 477 images (86.1%). There was a 1.8% analytical discrepancy noted between the textbook reviewers. The distribution on the general US population (NHANES) is: FP score 1: 1.6%, FP score 2: 33.1%, FP score 3: 47.8%, FP score 4: 4.9%, FP score 5: 3.6%, FP score 6: 9.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening of commonly used general surgery textbooks showed a significant lack of diversity in image-based skin tone representation when compared to the United States population at large. The overwhelming majority of images were of light skin tones. Improving diversity of imagery in educational material, such as basic textbooks, might help reduce observed disparities in outcomes among surgical patients in the future.

Video-based educational programs offer a promising avenue to augment surgical preparation, allow for targeted feedback delivery, and facilitate surgical coaching. Recently, developments in surgical intelligence and computer vision have allowed for automated video annotation and organization, drastically decreasing the manual workload required to implement video-based educational programs. In this article, we outline the development of a novel AI-assisted video forum and describe the early use in surgical education at our institution.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop and validate 6 checklists for evaluating abdominal pain in clinical simulation scenarios; to assess student competencies in managing 6 clinical cases using OSCE, based on faculty evaluations; and to analyze discrepancies between faculty and student evaluations.

DESIGN

A practical workshop was designed to address 6 clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical conditions. Four scenarios employed medium fidelity simulators, while 2 scenarios employed standardized patient methodology. Prior to the workshop, students received theoretical audiovisual material. At the conclusion of the workshop, students were evaluated using checklists that assessed communication, privacy, anamnesis, and technical skills. Ten workshops were conducted over 3 years, using the OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) format for evaluation.

SETTING

In the statistical analysis, t-Student tests or ANOVA were employed to ascertain whether there were any significant differences between the groups. In the process of validating checklists for clinical scenarios, 6 experts were asked to evaluate each item on a scale of 1 to 9. To assess the degree of agreement among experts, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed.

PARTICIPANTS

The study involved a total of 670 third-year medical students from the University of Murcia (UMU), Spain, who participated in the subject "Medical-Surgical Skills."

RESULTS

High levels of appropriateness were observed for the checklist items, with mean scores above 7.5 points, as well as high levels of inter-expert agreement. Students obtained a mean score of 8 points in the evaluation of each clinical scenario. No significant differences were found between faculty and student scores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The learning method focused on clinical scenarios of abdominal surgical diseases effectively enhanced the clinical skills of third-year medical students. It used pre-existing audiovisual materials, hands-on workshops with medium-fidelity simulators, and standardized patients. Consistent evaluations from students and faculty confirmed the efficacy of these strategies.

BACKGROUND

Night float rotations are associated with decreased feedback, educational conference attendance, and operative time. Interns are also more isolated and spend less time on teams. We therefore developed a novel post night shift initiative to address these shortcomings and examined its impact on the educational experience and sense of belonging among interns.

METHODS

A program of weekly senior resident-led post night shift sessions was instituted at a university-based general surgery residency program for the first quarter of the academic year. Four interns and one senior resident participated in each session. Feedback surveys were administered. A previously validated Belonging in Surgery survey was also administered to all general surgery interns at the end of the quarter.

RESULTS

Eleven interns had night float rotations within the first 3 months of the academic year. The intern feedback survey response rate was 93% (10/11). All intern respondents attended at least 3 sessions. Interns felt that the sessions increased familiarity with each other (85%) and senior residents (92%), improved clinical decision making (77%), and provided a safe space for discussion (69%). The senior resident survey response rate was 86% (n = 14). All senior residents enjoyed teaching the sessions and felt that they improved their familiarity with interns. The intern belonging survey response rate was 84% (16/19). Categorical interns had significantly higher belonging scores than preliminary interns at the end of the first quarter (mean 48.1 vs 41.6, p = 0.009). There was a trend toward decreased belonging scores for interns who had night float rotations early in the year which did not meet statistical significance (42.9 vs 47.4, p = 0.059).

CONCLUSION

This novel program improved intern decision-making, familiarity with other residents, and comfort calling senior residents for assistance overnight. There was no statistically significant difference in belonging between interns who started residency on night float versus those who did not. Similar programs may help address concerns regarding missed learning opportunities and decreased sense of community during these rotations.

OBJECTIVE

The American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) is an important factor in general surgery resident career development. The use of practice question banks for ABSITE preparation improves exam scores and completing more practice questions results in higher scores. The objective of this study is to describe the design of a novel, team-based ABSITE competition implemented into our residency program and analyze its effect on exam performance.

DESIGN

For the 2023 to 2024 academic year (AY), residents were randomly sorted into teams. The number of TrueLearn (TL) practice questions completed by each team during the 6-month period preceding the 2024 ABSITE was monitored at regular intervals. Paired sample t-test was used to compare total questions completed and ABSITE percent scores from the prior AY. Simple linear regression was performed to determine if total completed questions predicted ABSITE percent scores, and if the change in total completed questions predicted a change in ABSITE percent scores for unique residents.

SETTING

University-affiliated general surgery residency program.

PARTICIPANTS

About 34 clinical and research general surgery residents.

RESULTS

Mean total TL questions completed per resident increased by 175.2, with a difference trending toward statistical significance (1037.9 ± 583.6 vs 1213.1 ± 596.0, p = 0.08). Mean ABSITE percent scores significantly increased by 4.6% (68.2 ± 8.7 vs 72.8 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Total completed questions positively correlated with ABSITE percent scores (R² = 0.21, F (1,66) = 17.04, p < 0.001). Among individual residents, completing more questions than the prior AY predicted improvement in ABSITE percent scores (R² =.18, F (1,32) = 7.02, p = 0.01). Our model predicts that by completing 300 additional practice questions (e.g. 10 more questions/day for 1 month) a resident's ABSITE percent score will increase by 4.8 percentage points.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a team-based ABSITE competition is a straightforward and effective intervention that increases general surgery resident question bank utilization and significantly improves ABSITE percent scores.