Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710
Cheng Wang , Fengwei Guo , Shuaijie Zhao , Zhongpan Zhu , Yuxin Zhang
{"title":"Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios","authors":"Cheng Wang ,&nbsp;Fengwei Guo ,&nbsp;Shuaijie Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhongpan Zhu ,&nbsp;Yuxin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Driver models are crucial for the safety assessment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of their role as reference models. Specifically, an AV is expected to achieve at least the same level of safety performance as a careful and competent driver model. To make this comparison possible, quantitative modeling of careful and competent driver models is essential. Thus, the UNECE Regulation No. 157 proposes two driver models as benchmarks for AVs, enabling safety assessment of AV longitudinal behaviors. However, these two driver models are unable to be applied in non-car-following scenarios, limiting their applications in scenarios such as highway merging. To this end, we propose a careful and competent driver model for highway merging (CCDM2) scenarios using interpretable reinforcement learning-based decision-making and safety constraint control. We compare our model’s safe driving capabilities with human drivers in challenging merging scenarios and demonstrate the ”careful” and ”competent” characteristics of our model while ensuring its interpretability. The results indicate the model’s capability to handle merging scenarios with even better safety performance than human drivers. This model is of great value for AV safety assessment in merging scenarios and contributes to future reference driver models to be included in AV safety regulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107710"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524002550","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driver models are crucial for the safety assessment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because of their role as reference models. Specifically, an AV is expected to achieve at least the same level of safety performance as a careful and competent driver model. To make this comparison possible, quantitative modeling of careful and competent driver models is essential. Thus, the UNECE Regulation No. 157 proposes two driver models as benchmarks for AVs, enabling safety assessment of AV longitudinal behaviors. However, these two driver models are unable to be applied in non-car-following scenarios, limiting their applications in scenarios such as highway merging. To this end, we propose a careful and competent driver model for highway merging (CCDM2) scenarios using interpretable reinforcement learning-based decision-making and safety constraint control. We compare our model’s safe driving capabilities with human drivers in challenging merging scenarios and demonstrate the ”careful” and ”competent” characteristics of our model while ensuring its interpretability. The results indicate the model’s capability to handle merging scenarios with even better safety performance than human drivers. This model is of great value for AV safety assessment in merging scenarios and contributes to future reference driver models to be included in AV safety regulations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动驾驶汽车的安全评估:高速公路并线场景的参考驾驶员模型
驾驶员模型对于自动驾驶汽车(AV)的安全评估至关重要,因为它们具有参考模型的作用。具体而言,人们期望自动驾驶汽车至少达到与谨慎、称职的驾驶员模型相同的安全性能水平。要进行这种比较,必须对谨慎和称职的驾驶员模型进行定量建模。因此,联合国欧洲经济委员会第 157 号条例提出了两种驾驶员模型作为自动驾驶汽车的基准,以便对自动驾驶汽车的纵向行为进行安全评估。然而,这两种驾驶员模型无法应用于非跟车场景,限制了它们在高速公路并线等场景中的应用。为此,我们利用可解释的基于强化学习的决策和安全约束控制,提出了适用于高速公路并线(CCDM2)场景的谨慎而称职的驾驶员模型。我们将模型的安全驾驶能力与人类驾驶员在具有挑战性的并线场景中的驾驶能力进行了比较,在确保模型可解释性的同时,展示了模型的 "谨慎 "和 "胜任 "特性。结果表明,模型在处理并线场景时的安全性能甚至优于人类驾驶员。该模型对于并线场景中的自动驾驶汽车安全评估具有重要价值,并有助于为未来纳入自动驾驶汽车安全法规的参考驾驶员模型做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
Why they take the risk to perform a direct left turn at intersections: A data-driven framework for cyclist violation modeling. Assessing the safety impacts of winter road maintenance operations using connected vehicle data Partially constrained latent class analysis of highway crash injury severities: Investigating discrete spatial heterogeneity from regional data sources Recognizing and explaining driving stress using a Shapley additive explanation model by fusing EEG and behavior signals Study on optimization design of guide signs in dense interchange sections of eight-lane freeway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1