{"title":"Adoption of abatement technology in an uncertain world: An experiment","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper embeds the decision to invest in abatement technology in a social dilemma game while endogenizing the probability of environmental hazard. Both the model and a laboratory experiment show that risk-averse agents invest less in abatement, particularly when the probability of environmental damage is high. Specifically, an inverted-U relationship between investment in abatement technology and risk aversion is observed. I also find that the Bayesian Value of a Statistical Life (BVSL) correlates positively with saving and negatively with both production and abatement technology. The results suggest that uncertain damage from nature negatively affects abatement technology adoption but promotes group efficiency at low damage probabilities, while it is counterproductive for group efficiency when the probability is high. While uncertainty can bring a short-term increase in cooperation, it fails to curb the tendency towards overuse in the long run.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268124002282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper embeds the decision to invest in abatement technology in a social dilemma game while endogenizing the probability of environmental hazard. Both the model and a laboratory experiment show that risk-averse agents invest less in abatement, particularly when the probability of environmental damage is high. Specifically, an inverted-U relationship between investment in abatement technology and risk aversion is observed. I also find that the Bayesian Value of a Statistical Life (BVSL) correlates positively with saving and negatively with both production and abatement technology. The results suggest that uncertain damage from nature negatively affects abatement technology adoption but promotes group efficiency at low damage probabilities, while it is counterproductive for group efficiency when the probability is high. While uncertainty can bring a short-term increase in cooperation, it fails to curb the tendency towards overuse in the long run.
本文将投资减排技术的决策嵌入社会两难博弈中,同时将环境危害的概率内生化。模型和实验室实验都表明,规避风险的行为主体对减排的投资较少,尤其是在环境损害概率较高的情况下。具体而言,在减排技术投资与风险规避之间存在倒 U 型关系。我还发现,统计寿命的贝叶斯价值(BVSL)与储蓄正相关,与生产和减排技术负相关。结果表明,不确定的自然损害会对减排技术的采用产生负面影响,但在损害概率较低时,会促进群体效率,而在损害概率较高时,则会对群体效率产生反作用。虽然不确定性会在短期内增加合作,但从长远来看,它无法抑制过度使用的趋势。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.