Validation of a new gamma ray soil bulk density sensor

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE European Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1111/ejss.13542
Karin H. J. Pepers, Fenny van Egmond, Ronald Koomans, Kees Teuling, Gijs Staats, Gera van Os
{"title":"Validation of a new gamma ray soil bulk density sensor","authors":"Karin H. J. Pepers,&nbsp;Fenny van Egmond,&nbsp;Ronald Koomans,&nbsp;Kees Teuling,&nbsp;Gijs Staats,&nbsp;Gera van Os","doi":"10.1111/ejss.13542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil compaction and soil bulk density are key soil properties affecting soil health and soil ecosystem services like crop production, water retention and purification and carbon sequestration. The standard method for soil bulk density measurements using Kopecky rings is very labour intensive, time consuming and leaves notable damage to the field. Accurate data on bulk density are therefore scarce. To enable large-scale data collection, we tested a new portable gamma ray sensor (RhoC) for in situ field and dry bulk density measurements up to 1 m depth. In this first validation study, measurements with the RhoC-sensor were compared with classic ring sampling. Measurements were made in two agricultural fields in the Netherlands (a sandy clay loam and a sandy soil), with large variation in subsoil compaction. At 10 locations within each field, three soil density profiles were made. Each profile comprised six depth measurements (every 10 cm from 10 to 60 cm depth) using the RhoC-sensor and Kopecky rings, resulting in 30 pairwise profiles and 180 measurements in total per field. At an average soil density of 1.5 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, the relative uncertainty was 9% for the Kopecky rings and 15% for the RhoC-sensor. Because the RhoC-sensor is easy and quick to use, the higher relative uncertainty can easily be compensated for by making additional measurements per location. In conclusion, the RhoC-sensor allows a reliable quantitative in situ assessment of both field and dry bulk density. This provides the much-needed possibility for rapid and accurate assessment of soil compaction. The acquisition of this data supports the calculation of soil organic carbon stocks and is indispensable for (national) soil monitoring, to assess soil health and to inform sustainable land management practices for sustained or improved soil health and provision of soil ecosystem services, such as requested in the proposed EU Directive on Soil Monitoring and Resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"75 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.13542","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.13542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil compaction and soil bulk density are key soil properties affecting soil health and soil ecosystem services like crop production, water retention and purification and carbon sequestration. The standard method for soil bulk density measurements using Kopecky rings is very labour intensive, time consuming and leaves notable damage to the field. Accurate data on bulk density are therefore scarce. To enable large-scale data collection, we tested a new portable gamma ray sensor (RhoC) for in situ field and dry bulk density measurements up to 1 m depth. In this first validation study, measurements with the RhoC-sensor were compared with classic ring sampling. Measurements were made in two agricultural fields in the Netherlands (a sandy clay loam and a sandy soil), with large variation in subsoil compaction. At 10 locations within each field, three soil density profiles were made. Each profile comprised six depth measurements (every 10 cm from 10 to 60 cm depth) using the RhoC-sensor and Kopecky rings, resulting in 30 pairwise profiles and 180 measurements in total per field. At an average soil density of 1.5 g/cm3, the relative uncertainty was 9% for the Kopecky rings and 15% for the RhoC-sensor. Because the RhoC-sensor is easy and quick to use, the higher relative uncertainty can easily be compensated for by making additional measurements per location. In conclusion, the RhoC-sensor allows a reliable quantitative in situ assessment of both field and dry bulk density. This provides the much-needed possibility for rapid and accurate assessment of soil compaction. The acquisition of this data supports the calculation of soil organic carbon stocks and is indispensable for (national) soil monitoring, to assess soil health and to inform sustainable land management practices for sustained or improved soil health and provision of soil ecosystem services, such as requested in the proposed EU Directive on Soil Monitoring and Resilience.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证新型伽马射线土壤容重传感器
土壤紧实度和土壤容重是影响土壤健康和土壤生态系统服务(如作物产量、保水和净水以及固碳)的关键土壤特性。使用科佩奇环测量土壤容重的标准方法非常耗费人力和时间,而且会对田地造成明显的破坏。因此,准确的容重数据非常稀缺。为实现大规模数据采集,我们测试了一种新型便携式伽马射线传感器(RhoC),用于现场和干容重测量,测量深度可达 1 米。在首次验证研究中,我们将 RhoC 传感器的测量结果与传统的环状取样进行了比较。测量在荷兰的两块农田中进行(沙质粘壤土和沙质土壤),底土压实度差异较大。在每块田地的 10 个地点,制作了三个土壤密度剖面图。每个剖面包括六次深度测量(从 10 厘米到 60 厘米,每隔 10 厘米测量一次),使用 RhoC 传感器和 Kopecky 测量环,每块田共有 30 对剖面和 180 次测量。在平均土壤密度为 1.5 g/cm3 时,科佩克环的相对不确定性为 9%,RhoC 传感器为 15%。由于 RhoC 传感器使用简便快捷,因此可以通过在每个位置进行额外测量来轻松补偿较高的相对不确定性。总之,RhoC 传感器可以对现场密度和干容重进行可靠的现场定量评估。这为快速、准确地评估土壤压实度提供了亟需的可能性。获取这些数据有助于计算土壤有机碳储量,对于(国家)土壤监测、评估土壤健康以及为持续或改善土壤健康和提供土壤生态系统服务的可持续土地管理实践提供信息是不可或缺的,例如拟议中的欧盟土壤监测和恢复指令所要求的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
期刊最新文献
Easily mobilized metals and acidity in acid sulfate soils across the Swedish coastal plains ‘Shifting gears ain't easy’: Disciplinary resistances to perspective shifts in soil science and how to move forward Cover cropping in organic reduced tillage systems: Maximizing soil cover or plant above ground biomass input? No relationship between outputs of simple humus balance calculators (VDLUFA and STAND) and soil organic carbon trends A GSD-driven approach to deriving stochastic soil strength parameters under hybrid machine learning models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1