Determination of the Optimal Volume of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Single-Injection Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Phase I/II Trial.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005159
Hongye Zhang, Jinyu Wu, Yongsheng Miao, Ying Yuan, Zongyang Qu, Yaonan Zhang, Zhen Hua
{"title":"Determination of the Optimal Volume of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Single-Injection Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Phase I/II Trial.","authors":"Hongye Zhang, Jinyu Wu, Yongsheng Miao, Ying Yuan, Zongyang Qu, Yaonan Zhang, Zhen Hua","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A brachial plexus block plays an important role in providing perioperative analgesia for shoulder surgery; however, the inherent risk of phrenic nerve block and resulting hemidiaphragmatic paralysis may limit its use in patients with compromised pulmonary function. This study aimed to evaluate safety, efficacy, the maximum tolerated volume, and the optimal biological volume of 0.5% ropivacaine used in a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this seamless single-arm exploratory phase I/II trial, a novel Bayesian optimal interval design was used to guide volume escalation for determination of the maximum tolerated volume, followed by sequential volume expansion using Bayesian optimal phase 2 design to establish the optimal biological volume. Fifty-four patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery received a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine ranging from 15 mL to 40 mL. The primary outcomes were complete or partial hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in phase I, measured using ultrasound 30 min after block completion, and the block success in phase II, defined as achieving a total sensorimotor score ≥12 points and the total sensory score ≥3, measured through manual sensorimotor testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum tolerated volume for the single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block was determined to be 35 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, with a hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.09 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.29). The optimal biological volume was found to be 25 mL, with a block success rate of 1.0 (95% credible interval, 0.95 to 1.0) and a negligible hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.01 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block using 25 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine produced consistent block success with a minimal HDP rate, suggesting the need for further studies to confirm this result in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A brachial plexus block plays an important role in providing perioperative analgesia for shoulder surgery; however, the inherent risk of phrenic nerve block and resulting hemidiaphragmatic paralysis may limit its use in patients with compromised pulmonary function. This study aimed to evaluate safety, efficacy, the maximum tolerated volume, and the optimal biological volume of 0.5% ropivacaine used in a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Methods: In this seamless single-arm exploratory phase I/II trial, a novel Bayesian optimal interval design was used to guide volume escalation for determination of the maximum tolerated volume, followed by sequential volume expansion using Bayesian optimal phase 2 design to establish the optimal biological volume. Fifty-four patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery received a single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block with 0.5% ropivacaine ranging from 15 mL to 40 mL. The primary outcomes were complete or partial hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in phase I, measured using ultrasound 30 min after block completion, and the block success in phase II, defined as achieving a total sensorimotor score ≥12 points and the total sensory score ≥3, measured through manual sensorimotor testing.

Results: The maximum tolerated volume for the single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block was determined to be 35 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, with a hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.09 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.29). The optimal biological volume was found to be 25 mL, with a block success rate of 1.0 (95% credible interval, 0.95 to 1.0) and a negligible hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate of 0.01 (95% credible interval, 0 to 0.06).

Conclusions: A single-injection retroclavicular brachial plexus block using 25 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine produced consistent block success with a minimal HDP rate, suggesting the need for further studies to confirm this result in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定肩关节镜手术单次注射锁骨后臂丛神经阻滞中 0.5% 罗哌卡因的最佳用量:I/II 期试验。
背景:臂丛神经阻滞在肩部手术的围手术期镇痛中发挥着重要作用;然而,膈神经阻滞的固有风险和由此导致的半膈麻痹可能会限制其在肺功能受损患者中的应用。本研究旨在评估 0.5% 罗哌卡因用于肩关节镜手术单次注射锁骨后臂丛阻滞的安全性、有效性、最大耐受量和最佳生物容量:在这项无缝单臂探索性 I/II 期试验中,采用了一种新颖的贝叶斯优化间隔设计来指导容量升级,以确定最大耐受容量,然后采用贝叶斯优化 2 期设计进行连续容量扩张,以确定最佳生物容量。54 名接受肩关节镜手术的患者接受了 0.5% 罗哌卡因单次注射锁骨后臂丛阻滞,注射量从 15 毫升到 40 毫升不等。第一阶段的主要结果是完全或部分半膈麻痹,在阻滞完成后30分钟用超声波测量;第二阶段的阻滞成功率是通过手动感觉运动测试,达到感觉运动总分≥12分,感觉总分≥3分:单次注射锁骨后臂丛神经阻滞的最大耐受量为35毫升0.5%罗哌卡因,半膈麻痹率为0.09(95%可信区间为0至0.29)。最佳生物容量为 25 毫升,阻滞成功率为 1.0(95% 可信区间为 0.95 至 1.0),半膈麻痹率为 0.01(95% 可信区间为 0 至 0.06),可忽略不计:使用25毫升0.5%罗哌卡因进行单次锁骨后臂丛神经阻滞可获得稳定的阻滞成功率,且半膈麻痹率极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
期刊最新文献
Navigating Hemolysis and the Renal Implications of Hemoglobin Toxicity in Cardiac Surgery. Activation of α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Inhibits Hepatic Necroptosis and Ameliorates Acute Liver Injury in Mice. Cardiovascular Effects of Increasing Positive End-expiratory Pressure in a Model of Left Ventricular Cardiogenic Shock in Female Pigs. Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypass Activity Use in Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity-matched Analysis of Safety Outcomes. Paravertebral versus Pectoralis-II (Interpectoral and Pectoserratus) Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia after Nonmastectomy Breast Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Observer-masked Noninferiority Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1