Pub Date : 2024-11-18DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005302
Amit Bardia, Edward R Melnick, Terika McCall, Xiwen Zhao, Hung-Mo Lin, Clark Fisher, Matthew M Burg, Robert B Schonberger
Background: Antibiotics play a crucial role in preventing surgical site infections, yet adherence to Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines varies widely. This qualitative study aimed to explore factors influencing perioperative antibiotic administration and assess the potential impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool on guideline adherence.
Methods: In this qualitative study, perioperative personnel with diverse roles (surgeons, anesthesiologists, certified nurse anesthetists, trainees, and pharmacists) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview format from September 2023 through April 2024. Interviews were then analyzed for codes which were assigned to concepts using the constant comparison method for assessment of factors that were described as barriers or facilitators of guideline adherence.
Results: After piloting with three interviews, we conducted nine sessions with a total of 17 participants: 7 attending anesthesiologists, 3 resident trainees, 2 perioperative pharmacists, 3 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), and 2 attending surgeons. Key themes emerged: (1) Limited familiarity with Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) antibiotic guidelines, (2) Lack of standardization and optimization of antibiotic decision-making process, (3) Challenges with managing beta-lactam allergies, (4) Difficulty optimizing vancomycin timing, and (5) Perceived benefit of a Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in enhancing workflow and guideline adherence.
Conclusions: Non-adherence to antibiotic guidelines in the perioperative setting often results from a lack of structured workflow. Our interviews provide a foundation for developing a clinical decision support tool tailored to provider needs, aiming to improve user satisfaction and promote better adherence to perioperative antibiotic guidelines.
{"title":"Individual and System Level Factors Contributing to Guideline Non-Adherent Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis at a Tertiary Health Care System: A Qualitative Analysis.","authors":"Amit Bardia, Edward R Melnick, Terika McCall, Xiwen Zhao, Hung-Mo Lin, Clark Fisher, Matthew M Burg, Robert B Schonberger","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005302","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotics play a crucial role in preventing surgical site infections, yet adherence to Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines varies widely. This qualitative study aimed to explore factors influencing perioperative antibiotic administration and assess the potential impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) tool on guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this qualitative study, perioperative personnel with diverse roles (surgeons, anesthesiologists, certified nurse anesthetists, trainees, and pharmacists) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview format from September 2023 through April 2024. Interviews were then analyzed for codes which were assigned to concepts using the constant comparison method for assessment of factors that were described as barriers or facilitators of guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After piloting with three interviews, we conducted nine sessions with a total of 17 participants: 7 attending anesthesiologists, 3 resident trainees, 2 perioperative pharmacists, 3 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), and 2 attending surgeons. Key themes emerged: (1) Limited familiarity with Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) antibiotic guidelines, (2) Lack of standardization and optimization of antibiotic decision-making process, (3) Challenges with managing beta-lactam allergies, (4) Difficulty optimizing vancomycin timing, and (5) Perceived benefit of a Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in enhancing workflow and guideline adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-adherence to antibiotic guidelines in the perioperative setting often results from a lack of structured workflow. Our interviews provide a foundation for developing a clinical decision support tool tailored to provider needs, aiming to improve user satisfaction and promote better adherence to perioperative antibiotic guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-11DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005293
Annie Xin, Anneke Grobler, Graham Bell, Jurgen C de Graaff, Liam Dorris, Nicola Disma, Mary Ellen McCann, Davinia E Withington, Andrew J Davidson
Background: The GAS trial demonstrated evidence that most neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years and 5 years of age in infants who received a single general anaesthetic (GA) for elective inguinal herniorrhaphy were clinically equivalent when compared to infants who did not receive GA. More than 20% of the children in the trial had at least one subsequent anaesthetic exposure after their initial surgery. Using the GAS database, this study aimed to address whether multiple (2 or more) GA exposures compared to one or no GA exposure in early childhood were associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 5 years.
Methods: Children with multiple GA exposures and children with one or no GA exposure were identified from the GAS database. The primary outcome was the full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence third edition (WPPSI-III) at 5 years of age. Secondary outcomes included neurocognitive tests addressing all major developmental domains and caregiver-reported questionnaires assessing emotional and behavioural problems.
Results: Complete assessment was available from a total of 90 children in the multiple GA group and 141 children in the 0 or 1 GA group. Compared with children with a single or no GA exposure, multiply exposed children scored on average almost 6 points lower (mean: -5.8, 95% CI: -10.2 to -1.4, p= 0.011) in WPPSI-III FSIQ. They also demonstrated lower verbal and performance IQ scores and more emotional, behavioural, and executive function difficulties. However, significant residual confounding cannot be excluded from the results due to the observational nature of this study.
Conclusions: Multiple GA exposure before 5 years of age was associated with reduced performance in general intelligence score and some domains of neurodevelopmental assessments. The clinical significance of our results must be cautiously interpreted in light of several sources of limitations including small sample size and unadjusted residual confounding. This study illustrates the limitations of trial data sets that may not be fit for the purpose for the secondary analysis.
背景:GAS 试验证明,在选择性腹股沟疝成形术中接受单次全身麻醉(GA)的婴儿与未接受 GA 的婴儿相比,其 2 岁和 5 岁时的大多数神经发育结果在临床上是相同的。试验中超过 20% 的患儿在首次手术后至少有一次后续麻醉暴露。本研究利用GAS数据库,旨在探讨在幼儿期多次(2次或2次以上)接触GA与1次或未接触GA相比,是否与5岁时神经发育结果较差有关:方法:从GAS数据库中找出多次暴露于GA的儿童和只暴露或未暴露于GA的儿童。主要结果是5岁时韦氏学前和小学智力量表第三版(WPPSI-III)的全面智商(FSIQ)。次要结果包括针对所有主要发育领域的神经认知测试以及由照顾者报告的情绪和行为问题评估问卷:共有 90 名多重 GA 组儿童和 141 名 0 或 1 GA 组儿童接受了完整的评估。与只接触过一次或没有接触过 GA 的儿童相比,多次接触 GA 的儿童在 WPPSI-III FSIQ 中的得分平均低近 6 分(平均值:-5.8,95% CI:-10.2 至-1.4,p= 0.011)。他们的言语和表现智商得分也较低,情绪、行为和执行功能方面的困难也较多。然而,由于本研究的观察性质,结果中无法排除重大的残余混杂因素:结论:5 岁前多次暴露于 GA 与一般智力得分和神经发育评估的某些领域表现下降有关。鉴于样本量较小和未调整的残余混杂因素等几个方面的局限性,我们必须谨慎地解释研究结果的临床意义。这项研究说明了试验数据集的局限性,这些数据集可能不适合二次分析的目的。
{"title":"Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Multiple General Anaesthetic Exposure Before Five Years Of Age - A Cohort Study.","authors":"Annie Xin, Anneke Grobler, Graham Bell, Jurgen C de Graaff, Liam Dorris, Nicola Disma, Mary Ellen McCann, Davinia E Withington, Andrew J Davidson","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The GAS trial demonstrated evidence that most neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years and 5 years of age in infants who received a single general anaesthetic (GA) for elective inguinal herniorrhaphy were clinically equivalent when compared to infants who did not receive GA. More than 20% of the children in the trial had at least one subsequent anaesthetic exposure after their initial surgery. Using the GAS database, this study aimed to address whether multiple (2 or more) GA exposures compared to one or no GA exposure in early childhood were associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with multiple GA exposures and children with one or no GA exposure were identified from the GAS database. The primary outcome was the full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence third edition (WPPSI-III) at 5 years of age. Secondary outcomes included neurocognitive tests addressing all major developmental domains and caregiver-reported questionnaires assessing emotional and behavioural problems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete assessment was available from a total of 90 children in the multiple GA group and 141 children in the 0 or 1 GA group. Compared with children with a single or no GA exposure, multiply exposed children scored on average almost 6 points lower (mean: -5.8, 95% CI: -10.2 to -1.4, p= 0.011) in WPPSI-III FSIQ. They also demonstrated lower verbal and performance IQ scores and more emotional, behavioural, and executive function difficulties. However, significant residual confounding cannot be excluded from the results due to the observational nature of this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple GA exposure before 5 years of age was associated with reduced performance in general intelligence score and some domains of neurodevelopmental assessments. The clinical significance of our results must be cautiously interpreted in light of several sources of limitations including small sample size and unadjusted residual confounding. This study illustrates the limitations of trial data sets that may not be fit for the purpose for the secondary analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-11DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005291
James M Hitt, Peter L Elkin, Oscar A de Leon-Casasola
Background: Prescription rates for buprenorphine in opioid use disorder are increasing, and recent guidelines recommend its continuation during and after surgery; however, evidence from clinical outcome studies is limited. We tested the hypotheses that 1) perioperative continuation of buprenorphine does not result in higher pain scores and 2) that this approach does not result in higher supplemental postoperative opioid requirements.
Methods: The Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse was queried for patients who underwent surgery while being prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder between 2010 and 2020. Analysis of the prescription record was used to infer buprenorphine management, and a 3:1 matched control set of patients without buprenorphine prescriptions was generated. We examined patients who continued buprenorphine, patients who had buprenorphine interrupted, and control patients. The primary outcome was time-weighted average postoperative pain scores from inpatient and outpatient sources within 72 hours of surgery. The secondary outcome was postoperative average daily morphine equivalent opioid requirements within two weeks of surgery.
Results: A total of 1,881 surgical procedures in 1,673 patients taking buprenorphine for opioid use disorder were included; these procedures were matched to 5,748 control patients (5,775 procedures) without a buprenorphine prescription. Among the 1,881 procedures, 1,186 (63%) continued buprenorphine through the perioperative period while 695 (37%) interrupted buprenorphine. Pain scores were clinically similar for all three groups (4.1 ± 1.9 control [n = 3284], 4.9 ± 2.0 continued buprenorphine [n = 662], and 5.5 ± 1.7 interrupted buprenorphine [n = 419]; P < 0.001).Patients who continued buprenorphine did not require significantly more supplemental opioids as compared to controls (39.7 mg morphine equivalents/day ± 1.9 versus 36.5 ± 0.7, P = 0.23), and patients who interrupted buprenorphine received more supplemental opioids than those who continued it (74.2 ± 4.5 mg morphine equivalents/day versus 39.7 ± 1.9,respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Continuation of buprenorphine is not associated with higher average pain scores or postoperative opioid requirements, supporting recently published guidelines.
{"title":"Continuation versus Interruption of Buprenorphine/Naloxone in Adult Veterans Undergoing Surgery: Examination of Postoperative Pain and Opioid Utilization in a National Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"James M Hitt, Peter L Elkin, Oscar A de Leon-Casasola","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005291","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prescription rates for buprenorphine in opioid use disorder are increasing, and recent guidelines recommend its continuation during and after surgery; however, evidence from clinical outcome studies is limited. We tested the hypotheses that 1) perioperative continuation of buprenorphine does not result in higher pain scores and 2) that this approach does not result in higher supplemental postoperative opioid requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse was queried for patients who underwent surgery while being prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder between 2010 and 2020. Analysis of the prescription record was used to infer buprenorphine management, and a 3:1 matched control set of patients without buprenorphine prescriptions was generated. We examined patients who continued buprenorphine, patients who had buprenorphine interrupted, and control patients. The primary outcome was time-weighted average postoperative pain scores from inpatient and outpatient sources within 72 hours of surgery. The secondary outcome was postoperative average daily morphine equivalent opioid requirements within two weeks of surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,881 surgical procedures in 1,673 patients taking buprenorphine for opioid use disorder were included; these procedures were matched to 5,748 control patients (5,775 procedures) without a buprenorphine prescription. Among the 1,881 procedures, 1,186 (63%) continued buprenorphine through the perioperative period while 695 (37%) interrupted buprenorphine. Pain scores were clinically similar for all three groups (4.1 ± 1.9 control [n = 3284], 4.9 ± 2.0 continued buprenorphine [n = 662], and 5.5 ± 1.7 interrupted buprenorphine [n = 419]; P < 0.001).Patients who continued buprenorphine did not require significantly more supplemental opioids as compared to controls (39.7 mg morphine equivalents/day ± 1.9 versus 36.5 ± 0.7, P = 0.23), and patients who interrupted buprenorphine received more supplemental opioids than those who continued it (74.2 ± 4.5 mg morphine equivalents/day versus 39.7 ± 1.9,respectively; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuation of buprenorphine is not associated with higher average pain scores or postoperative opioid requirements, supporting recently published guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005287
Tilman Gross, Daniel Stehle, Chantal Nagel, Fangyuan Zhou, Emre Duman, Victor Hernandez-Olmos, Rekia Sinderwald, Hannah Gerninghaus, Jonas Petersen, Susanne Feil, Wiebke Kallenborn-Gerhardt, Ruirui Lu, Katharina Metzner, Robert Feil, Ewgenij Proschak, Achim Schmidtko
Background: Emerging evidence indicates that cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases exert distinct functions in pain processing and that targeting phosphodiesterases might be a novel strategy for pain relief. This study hypothesized that the phosphodiesterase isoform PDE10A might be a target for analgesic therapy.
Methods: In situ hybridization, immunostaining, cyclic nucleotide enzyme immunoassays, real-time cyclic guanosine monophosphate imaging, and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were performed to investigate the expression and activity of PDE10A in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord. Mice of both sexes were assessed in multiple pain models after the administration of specific PDE10A inhibitors.
Results: PDE10A is distinctly expressed in nociceptive neurons in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord of mice. Incubation of cultured sensory neurons with the PDE10A inhibitor, TAK-063 (150 nM), increased cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels in enzyme immunoassays and real-time imaging at the single-cell level. Strikingly, treatment with TAK-063 (0.3 mg/kg intraperitoneal) ameliorated the pain-like behavior of female and male mice in models of acute nociceptive pain after intraplantar injection of capsaicin (mean ± SD; 8.87 ± 8.78 s [TAK-063] vs. 51.24 ± 36.36 s [vehicle], P = 0.020) or allyl isothiocyanate (2.46 ± 3.43 s [TAK-063] vs. 10.36 ± 4.87 s [vehicle]; P = 0.018). Furthermore, TAK-063 (0.3 mg/kg intraperitoneal) reduced established pain-like behavior in models of inflammatory pain induced by intraplantar injection of zymosan (Two-way ANOVA, group, F(1, 18) = 48.51, TAK-063 vs. vehicle; P ≤ 0.0001) or complete Freund's adjuvant (F(1, 14) = 46.10, TAK-063 vs. vehicle; P ≤ 0.0001), without the development of antinociceptive tolerance. The antinociceptive effects were recapitulated using the PDE10A inhibitor PF-2545920.
Conclusion: Collectively, our data support the idea that PDE10A is a suitable target for the development of efficacious analgesic drugs.
背景:新的证据表明,环核苷酸磷酸二酯酶在疼痛处理过程中发挥着不同的功能,以磷酸二酯酶为靶点可能是一种新的镇痛策略。本研究假设磷酸二酯酶同工酶PDE10A可能是镇痛治疗的靶点:方法:通过原位杂交、免疫染色、环核苷酸酶免疫测定、实时环鸟苷酸单磷酸成像和实时定量反转录聚合酶链反应来研究背根神经节和脊髓中 PDE10A 的表达和活性。给小鼠注射特定的 PDE10A 抑制剂后,在多种疼痛模型中对雌雄小鼠进行了评估:结果:PDE10A 在小鼠背根神经节和脊髓的痛觉神经元中明显表达。用PDE10A抑制剂TAK-063(150 nM)诱导培养的感觉神经元,在酶免疫测定和单细胞实时成像中会增加环鸟苷单磷酸的水平。令人震惊的是,在急性痛觉模型中,雌性和雄性小鼠在跖内注射辣椒素后,TAK-063(0.3 mg/kg,腹腔注射)可改善其疼痛样行为(平均值±标度;8.87 ± 8.78 s [TAK-063] vs. 51.24 ± 36.36 s [载体],P = 0.020)或异硫氰酸烯丙酯(2.46 ± 3.43 s [TAK-063] vs. 10.36 ± 4.87 s [载体];P = 0.018)。此外,TAK-063(0.3 毫克/千克,腹腔注射)减少了跖内注射zymosan(双向方差分析,组,F(1,18)= 48.51,TAK-063 vs. 车辆;P ≤ 0.0001)或完全弗氏佐剂(F(1,14)= 46.10,TAK-063 vs. 车辆;P ≤ 0.0001)诱导的炎症性疼痛模型中已建立的疼痛样行为,且不会产生抗痛觉耐受性。使用 PDE10A 抑制剂 PF-2545920 可以重现这种抗痛觉效应:总之,我们的数据支持了 PDE10A 是开发有效镇痛药物的合适靶点这一观点。
{"title":"Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase 10A Alleviates Pain-like Behavior in Mice.","authors":"Tilman Gross, Daniel Stehle, Chantal Nagel, Fangyuan Zhou, Emre Duman, Victor Hernandez-Olmos, Rekia Sinderwald, Hannah Gerninghaus, Jonas Petersen, Susanne Feil, Wiebke Kallenborn-Gerhardt, Ruirui Lu, Katharina Metzner, Robert Feil, Ewgenij Proschak, Achim Schmidtko","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005287","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence indicates that cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases exert distinct functions in pain processing and that targeting phosphodiesterases might be a novel strategy for pain relief. This study hypothesized that the phosphodiesterase isoform PDE10A might be a target for analgesic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In situ hybridization, immunostaining, cyclic nucleotide enzyme immunoassays, real-time cyclic guanosine monophosphate imaging, and real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction were performed to investigate the expression and activity of PDE10A in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord. Mice of both sexes were assessed in multiple pain models after the administration of specific PDE10A inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PDE10A is distinctly expressed in nociceptive neurons in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord of mice. Incubation of cultured sensory neurons with the PDE10A inhibitor, TAK-063 (150 nM), increased cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels in enzyme immunoassays and real-time imaging at the single-cell level. Strikingly, treatment with TAK-063 (0.3 mg/kg intraperitoneal) ameliorated the pain-like behavior of female and male mice in models of acute nociceptive pain after intraplantar injection of capsaicin (mean ± SD; 8.87 ± 8.78 s [TAK-063] vs. 51.24 ± 36.36 s [vehicle], P = 0.020) or allyl isothiocyanate (2.46 ± 3.43 s [TAK-063] vs. 10.36 ± 4.87 s [vehicle]; P = 0.018). Furthermore, TAK-063 (0.3 mg/kg intraperitoneal) reduced established pain-like behavior in models of inflammatory pain induced by intraplantar injection of zymosan (Two-way ANOVA, group, F(1, 18) = 48.51, TAK-063 vs. vehicle; P ≤ 0.0001) or complete Freund's adjuvant (F(1, 14) = 46.10, TAK-063 vs. vehicle; P ≤ 0.0001), without the development of antinociceptive tolerance. The antinociceptive effects were recapitulated using the PDE10A inhibitor PF-2545920.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collectively, our data support the idea that PDE10A is a suitable target for the development of efficacious analgesic drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142581912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005163
Mark C Bicket,Meredith C B Adams,Anne C Fernandez
{"title":"From Notes to Knowledge: Deciphering Perioperative Risky Substance Use through Natural Language Processing.","authors":"Mark C Bicket,Meredith C B Adams,Anne C Fernandez","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005163","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"5 1","pages":"829-831"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142385206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}