Factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case surgery patients.

Q3 Nursing British Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.12968/bjon.2023.0277
Ruth Burgess
{"title":"Factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case surgery patients.","authors":"Ruth Burgess","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2023.0277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients admitted on the day of surgery are asked to arrive fasted, and they often fast for longer than necessary. Although pre-assessment supports patients to prepare for surgery, little is known about how they make fasting decisions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case patients and how to provide information pre-operatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study design was used. Semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out with 10 patients recruited from a single day-case unit. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Three themes provided context for fasting decisions: the operation as a serious event; the patient as an active partner; and the patient as a rule follower. Length of fast is determined by fasting decisions and practicalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients approach fasting decisions according to their knowledge and experience and their individual preferences for information. Pre-assessment nurses should tailor information to the patient and explain the rationale for fasting.</p>","PeriodicalId":35761,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.0277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients admitted on the day of surgery are asked to arrive fasted, and they often fast for longer than necessary. Although pre-assessment supports patients to prepare for surgery, little is known about how they make fasting decisions.

Aims: To explore factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case patients and how to provide information pre-operatively.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study design was used. Semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out with 10 patients recruited from a single day-case unit. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Findings: Three themes provided context for fasting decisions: the operation as a serious event; the patient as an active partner; and the patient as a rule follower. Length of fast is determined by fasting decisions and practicalities.

Conclusion: Patients approach fasting decisions according to their knowledge and experience and their individual preferences for information. Pre-assessment nurses should tailor information to the patient and explain the rationale for fasting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响日间手术患者禁食决定的因素。
背景:手术当天入院的患者被要求禁食,他们禁食的时间往往超过必要的时间。尽管术前评估有助于患者为手术做好准备,但人们对他们如何做出禁食决定知之甚少。目的:探讨影响日间手术患者禁食决定的因素以及如何在术前提供信息:方法:采用定性描述研究设计。对从一个日间病房招募的 10 名患者进行了半结构化电话访谈。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析:三个主题为禁食决定提供了背景:手术是一个严肃的事件;患者是积极的合作伙伴;患者是规则的遵守者。禁食时间的长短由禁食决定和实际情况决定:患者根据自己的知识和经验以及对信息的个人偏好来做出禁食决定。评估前护士应根据患者的具体情况提供信息,并解释禁食的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Nursing
British Journal of Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
404
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nursing (BJN) provides all nurses, regardless of specialism, with a comprehensive resource that brings together nursing practice, education and leadership. We believe that the nurse''s role has become increasingly demanding, which is why we have made some important updates to the journal. It now has more clinical content, more practical features - with clear learning outcomes – and new ''bitesize'' articles designed for accessibility. These changes have been made for one reason – to help easily obtain essential information you can trust.
期刊最新文献
A professional and legal duty to keep up to date. Calling the NMC to account. Evaluation of a safety-engineered peripherally inserted intravenous catheter with multiple access blood control: clinician acceptability and ease of use. Factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case surgery patients. Intravenous fluid therapy: an audit and discussion of improvements required for prescribers and administrators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1