Randomised controlled trials in vascular access devices in emergency departments: a scoping review protocol.

Q3 Nursing British Journal of Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.12968/bjon.2023.0283
Hui Grace Xu, Jed Duff, Nicole Marsh
{"title":"Randomised controlled trials in vascular access devices in emergency departments: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Hui Grace Xu, Jed Duff, Nicole Marsh","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2023.0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The significance of vascular access devices for patients in the emergency department (ED) is undeniable. When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) stand out as the most reliable sources of evidence compared with other study designs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore and synthesise the findings from RCTs related to vascular access devices in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search will be conducted in electronic medical databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, CINAHL and Embase databases. All RCTs focusing on peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters and intraosseous catheters, published in English and Chinese in peer-reviewed journals within the past decade, will be included.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review will summarise the current state of evidence for vascular access devices in the ED setting. This will identify gaps in the literature and, in turn, assist clinicians and researchers in pinpointing areas for future exploration and provide a valuable guide for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":35761,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nursing","volume":"33 14","pages":"S25-S29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2023.0283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The significance of vascular access devices for patients in the emergency department (ED) is undeniable. When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) stand out as the most reliable sources of evidence compared with other study designs.

Aim: To explore and synthesise the findings from RCTs related to vascular access devices in the ED setting.

Methods: A systematic search will be conducted in electronic medical databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubmed, CINAHL and Embase databases. All RCTs focusing on peripheral intravenous catheters, central venous catheters and intraosseous catheters, published in English and Chinese in peer-reviewed journals within the past decade, will be included.

Conclusion: This scoping review will summarise the current state of evidence for vascular access devices in the ED setting. This will identify gaps in the literature and, in turn, assist clinicians and researchers in pinpointing areas for future exploration and provide a valuable guide for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科血管通路装置的随机对照试验:范围界定审查协议。
背景:血管通路设备对急诊科(ED)患者的重要性毋庸置疑。在评估干预措施的有效性时,与其他研究设计相比,随机对照试验(RCT)是最可靠的证据来源。目的:探讨并综合与急诊科血管通路设备相关的 RCT 研究结果:方法:将在电子医学数据库中进行系统检索,包括 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Pubmed、CINAHL 和 Embase 数据库。将纳入过去十年间在同行评审期刊上发表的所有关于外周静脉导管、中心静脉导管和骨内导管的中英文 RCT:本范围界定综述将总结急诊室血管通路装置的现有证据。这将找出文献中的不足,进而帮助临床医生和研究人员确定未来需要探索的领域,并为未来的研究提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Nursing
British Journal of Nursing Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
404
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nursing (BJN) provides all nurses, regardless of specialism, with a comprehensive resource that brings together nursing practice, education and leadership. We believe that the nurse''s role has become increasingly demanding, which is why we have made some important updates to the journal. It now has more clinical content, more practical features - with clear learning outcomes – and new ''bitesize'' articles designed for accessibility. These changes have been made for one reason – to help easily obtain essential information you can trust.
期刊最新文献
A professional and legal duty to keep up to date. Calling the NMC to account. Evaluation of a safety-engineered peripherally inserted intravenous catheter with multiple access blood control: clinician acceptability and ease of use. Factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case surgery patients. Intravenous fluid therapy: an audit and discussion of improvements required for prescribers and administrators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1