"It's like a kind of chronic pain that goes with you": Understanding the phenomenon of family burden as experienced by primary caregivers of persons with serious mental illness who refuse treatment.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1037/prj0000613
Carmit-Noa Shpigelman, Netta Galimidi, Matat Kal
{"title":"\"It's like a kind of chronic pain that goes with you\": Understanding the phenomenon of family burden as experienced by primary caregivers of persons with serious mental illness who refuse treatment.","authors":"Carmit-Noa Shpigelman, Netta Galimidi, Matat Kal","doi":"10.1037/prj0000613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Persons who cope with serious mental illness (SMI) without immediate physical risk to themselves or others have the right to refuse to be treated. Treatment refusal has implications not only for the individual but also for the family, especially the primary caregivers. Still, less is known about the phenomenon of family burden while coping with a situation where the family member with SMI refuses treatment and lives in the community. The present study aimed to understand and describe the caregivers' lived experience of family burden in the context of treatment refusal among their relatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a descriptive phenomenological qualitative approach and a semi-structured interview guide, 15 family caregivers of persons with SMI refusing to receive medicinal treatment and rehabilitation services were interviewed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on the interview transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The caregivers described a complex experience of ongoing and intense burden that had a negative impact on the family cohesion and the caregivers' well-being. Four themes related to the perceived reasons for treatment refusal, the caregivers' experience of the family burden and cohesion, and coping with this situation were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications for practice: </strong>The findings demonstrate the unique family burden experienced by the caregivers, mainly as they are the only ones supporting the individual with SMI who refuses treatment. Practitioners should support these families throughout their coping process-from understanding the reasons for the refusal of treatment to continuous support in their daily coping by locating the control of the situation on the family level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47875,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000613","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Persons who cope with serious mental illness (SMI) without immediate physical risk to themselves or others have the right to refuse to be treated. Treatment refusal has implications not only for the individual but also for the family, especially the primary caregivers. Still, less is known about the phenomenon of family burden while coping with a situation where the family member with SMI refuses treatment and lives in the community. The present study aimed to understand and describe the caregivers' lived experience of family burden in the context of treatment refusal among their relatives.

Methods: Using a descriptive phenomenological qualitative approach and a semi-structured interview guide, 15 family caregivers of persons with SMI refusing to receive medicinal treatment and rehabilitation services were interviewed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted on the interview transcripts.

Results: The caregivers described a complex experience of ongoing and intense burden that had a negative impact on the family cohesion and the caregivers' well-being. Four themes related to the perceived reasons for treatment refusal, the caregivers' experience of the family burden and cohesion, and coping with this situation were identified.

Conclusions and implications for practice: The findings demonstrate the unique family burden experienced by the caregivers, mainly as they are the only ones supporting the individual with SMI who refuses treatment. Practitioners should support these families throughout their coping process-from understanding the reasons for the refusal of treatment to continuous support in their daily coping by locating the control of the situation on the family level. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"这就像一种伴随你一生的慢性疼痛":了解拒绝治疗的重症精神病患者的主要照顾者所经历的家庭负担现象。
目的:应对严重精神疾病(SMI)而不会对自己或他人造成直接身体风险的人有权拒绝接受治疗。拒绝治疗不仅对个人有影响,对家庭也有影响,尤其是对主要照顾者。然而,人们对患有 SMI 的家庭成员拒绝接受治疗并在社区生活时的家庭负担现象还知之甚少。本研究旨在了解和描述照顾者在其亲属拒绝治疗的情况下的家庭负担生活体验:采用描述性现象学定性方法和半结构化访谈指南,对 15 名拒绝接受药物治疗和康复服务的 SMI 患者的家庭照顾者进行了访谈。对访谈记录进行了归纳主题分析:结果:照顾者们描述了一种复杂的经历,即持续而沉重的负担对家庭凝聚力和照顾者的幸福产生了负面影响。研究确定了四个主题,分别涉及拒绝治疗的原因、照顾者对家庭负担和凝聚力的体验,以及如何应对这种情况:研究结果表明,照顾者承受着独特的家庭负担,主要是因为他们是唯一支持拒绝治疗的 SMI 患者的人。从业人员应在这些家庭的整个应对过程中为他们提供支持--从了解拒绝治疗的原因,到通过将情况的控制权置于家庭层面,为他们的日常应对提供持续支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is sponsored by the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, at Boston University"s Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences and by the US Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association (USPRA) . The mission of the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal is to promote the development of new knowledge related to psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery of persons with serious mental illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Harms of a single story: A researcher's personal narrative and plea for change. Consent to voluntary antipsychotic drug treatment-Is it free and informed? A multisite longitudinal evaluation of Canadian clubhouse members: Impact on hospitalizations and community functioning. Community as therapy: The theory of social practice. Confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) within the clubhouse model of psychosocial rehabilitation for serious mental illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1