Telemedicine and Teamwork Among Health Care Professionals: State of the Science.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0068
Caitlin McVey, Carina Katigbak
{"title":"Telemedicine and Teamwork Among Health Care Professionals: State of the Science.","authors":"Caitlin McVey, Carina Katigbak","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> As telemedicine becomes further rooted in standard patient care delivery, it is critical to understand how it may affect teamwork among health care providers. Understanding the state of the science between telemedicine and teamwork is an important first step. <b>Obejctive:</b> The purpose of this state-of-the-science review was to synthesize the published research on teamwork within the context of telemedicine. <b>Methods:</b> Data abstraction and analysis were structured following the Virtual Team Performance and the \"Big Five\" of Teamwork theoretical frameworks. The concepts within these models were used to organize data extraction. This state of the science used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. <b>Results:</b> A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria after final review. The most common variables were communication, tasks, leadership, team orientation, and team cohesion. Despite variable commonalities across the included articles, there was a discrepancy between improved and reduced teamwork outcomes with telemedicine. <b>Conclusions:</b> Multiple teamwork variables are influential across health care teams using telemedicine technologies-those that include communication, task facilitation, leadership, team orientation, and cohesion appear to have the greatest impact. However, it is not an individual teamwork variable, type of technology, or care environment alone that influences positive or negative outcomes among health care teams using telemedicine. Instead, it is a combination of factors and mechanisms that facilitate or hinder teamwork outcomes. A comprehensive model that describes the interaction of these common variables in teamwork among blended virtual and in-person health care teams is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As telemedicine becomes further rooted in standard patient care delivery, it is critical to understand how it may affect teamwork among health care providers. Understanding the state of the science between telemedicine and teamwork is an important first step. Obejctive: The purpose of this state-of-the-science review was to synthesize the published research on teamwork within the context of telemedicine. Methods: Data abstraction and analysis were structured following the Virtual Team Performance and the "Big Five" of Teamwork theoretical frameworks. The concepts within these models were used to organize data extraction. This state of the science used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria after final review. The most common variables were communication, tasks, leadership, team orientation, and team cohesion. Despite variable commonalities across the included articles, there was a discrepancy between improved and reduced teamwork outcomes with telemedicine. Conclusions: Multiple teamwork variables are influential across health care teams using telemedicine technologies-those that include communication, task facilitation, leadership, team orientation, and cohesion appear to have the greatest impact. However, it is not an individual teamwork variable, type of technology, or care environment alone that influences positive or negative outcomes among health care teams using telemedicine. Instead, it is a combination of factors and mechanisms that facilitate or hinder teamwork outcomes. A comprehensive model that describes the interaction of these common variables in teamwork among blended virtual and in-person health care teams is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗与医疗保健专业人员的团队合作:科学现状。
背景:随着远程医疗进一步扎根于标准的病人护理服务中,了解远程医疗如何影响医疗服务提供者之间的团队合作至关重要。了解远程医疗与团队合作之间的科学现状是重要的第一步。目的:本科学综述旨在综合已发表的有关远程医疗背景下团队合作的研究。研究方法:按照虚拟团队绩效和团队合作 "五大 "理论框架进行数据抽象和分析。这些模型中的概念用于组织数据提取。这项科学研究采用了《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南。结果经过最终审核,共有 14 项研究符合纳入标准。最常见的变量是沟通、任务、领导力、团队导向和团队凝聚力。尽管所纳入的文章存在变量上的共性,但远程医疗在团队合作成果的改善和减少之间存在差异。结论:多种团队合作变量对使用远程医疗技术的医疗团队都有影响--包括沟通、任务促进、领导力、团队定位和凝聚力在内的变量似乎影响最大。然而,在使用远程医疗的医疗团队中,影响积极或消极结果的并非单个团队合作变量、技术类型或医疗环境。相反,促进或阻碍团队合作成果的是各种因素和机制的组合。我们需要一个综合模型来描述这些共同变量在混合虚拟和面对面医疗团队之间团队合作中的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Telehealth in the United States: Are There Racial/Ethnic Differences? Disparities in Telehealth Offer and Use among U.S. Adults: 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth Services in Primary Care. Examination of Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Experience During COVID-19 in MNGHA, Saudi Arabia. Practical Experience with the Use of Electronic Headache Diaries and Video Consultations in Migraine Care from a Longitudinal Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1